Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 5;23:137. doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-02049-0

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Tumor cell-intrinsic MELK inhibition affects the infiltration and polarization of TAMs. (A) The effect of MELK knockdown on tumor growth in mouse xenograft models (n = 5/group). (B-C) The effect of MELK inhibition on tumor weight (B) and tumor volume (C) (n = 5/group). (D-G) IF staining reflecting the expression changes of PCNA (D), F4/80 (E), CD206 (F) and CD86 (G) upon MELK inhibition in tumor tissues. (H-I) Antibody filter array implying the effects of MELK expression on cytokines related to immune cell recruitment. (J) ELISA showing the effect of tumoral MELK inhibition on serum CCL2 concentration. (K) qRT‒PCR analysis detecting the expression change of CCL2 upon MELK inhibition. (L) The correlation between tumor weight and serum CCL2 concentration. (M) FCM analysis showing the role of MELK expression in CD8 + T-cell recruitment to tumor tissue. (N) FCM analysis showing the effect of MELK expression on the GZMA-positive cell proportion in recruited CD8 + T cells in tumor tissue. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001