Table 9.
Statistical comparison between the elaborated UV tools and the reference HPLC tool for CI and OR estimation in tablet forms
| Tablet formulation | CI | OR | HPLCa | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANN | FSD | MC | ANN | FSD | MC | CI | OR | |
| Averageb | 100.16 | 100.57 | 100.07 | 100.86 | 100.53 | 99.82 | 100.45 | 100.28 |
| SD | 1.82 | 0.86 | 1.59 | 1.70 | 1.08 | 1.49 | 0.94 | 1.45 |
| Variance | 3.3282 | 0.7378 | 2.5243 | 2.8826 | 1.1607 | 2.2267 | 0.8884 | 2.1019 |
| t-valuec | 0.3169 | 0.2034 | 0.4604 | 0.5862 | 0.3082 | 0.4935 | – | – |
| f-valuec | 3.7464 | 1.2041 | 2.8415 | 1.3715 | 1.8109 | 1.0594 | – | – |
aC-18 column utilizing acetonitrile: water as the mobile phase with (45:55v/v) ratio, pH sets to 3.0 via O-phosphoric acid, flow rate 1 ml/min, estimation at 299 nm
bn = 5
cf(0.05)6.388, t(0.05)2.306