Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 23;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13065-024-01126-1

Table 9.

Statistical comparison between the elaborated UV tools and the reference HPLC tool for CI and OR estimation in tablet forms

Tablet formulation CI OR HPLCa
ANN FSD MC ANN FSD MC CI OR
Averageb 100.16 100.57 100.07 100.86 100.53 99.82 100.45 100.28
SD 1.82 0.86 1.59 1.70 1.08 1.49 0.94 1.45
Variance 3.3282 0.7378 2.5243 2.8826 1.1607 2.2267 0.8884 2.1019
t-valuec 0.3169 0.2034 0.4604 0.5862 0.3082 0.4935
f-valuec 3.7464 1.2041 2.8415 1.3715 1.8109 1.0594

aC-18 column utilizing acetonitrile: water as the mobile phase with (45:55v/v) ratio, pH sets to 3.0 via O-phosphoric acid, flow rate 1 ml/min, estimation at 299 nm

bn = 5

cf(0.05)6.388, t(0.05)2.306