Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 24;53(8):1875–1885. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-01956-1

Table 2.

Concurrent Associations Between Status Hierarchy T1 and Bullying T1

Individual-level Bullying T1
Status Hierarchy – SD-hierarchy Status Hierarchy – Gini-hierarchy
Model 1a Model 1b Model 1c Model 2a Model 2b Model 2c
β (CI) β (CI) β (CI) β (CI) β (CI) β (CI)
Classroom-level variables
Status hierarchy - linear 0.14*** (0.08, 0.21) 0.17 (0.00, 0.35) 0.09 (−0.01, 0.19) −0.07* (−0.12, −0.01) 0.38** (0.11, 0.65) 0.43** (0.16, 0.69)
Status hierarchy - quadratic −0.03 (−0.21, 0.14) −0.45** (−0.72, −0.19) −0.40** (−0.67, −0.14)
Structure of status hierarchy −0.08* (−0.15, −0.01) −0.08* (−0.14, −0.01) −0.06 (−0.13, 0.01) 0.03 (−0.02, 0.09) 0.02 (−0.03, 0.07) −0.04 (−0.10, 0.03)
Classroom size −0.00 (−0.06, 0.05) −0.00 (−0.06, 0.05) −0.01 (−0.07, 0.04) −0.03 (−0.09, 0.03) −0.04 (−0.10, 0.01) −0.03 (−0.08, 0.03)
Classroom proportion of boys 0.08** (0.03, 0.13) 0.08** (0.03, 0.13) 0.08** (0.03, 0.13) 0.06*(0.01, 0.11) 0.06* (0.01, 0.10) 0.07** (0.02, 0.11)
Mean level of popularity 0.05 (−0.02, 0.13) 0.12** (0.04, 0.19)

Standardized coefficients are presented

p < 0.10. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001