Table 3.
Prospective Associations Between Status Hierarchy T1 and Bullying T2
| Individual-level Bullying T2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Status Hierarchy – SD-hierarchy | Status Hierarchy – Gini-hierarchy | |||||
| Model 3a | Model 3b | Model 3c | Model 4a | Model 4b | Model 4c | |
| β (CI) | β (CI) | β (CI) | β (CI) | β (CI) | β (CI) | |
| Individual-level variables | ||||||
| Bullying T1 | 0.74*** (0.71, 0.76) | 0.74*** (0.71, 0.76) | 0.74*** (0.71, 0.76) | 0.74*** (0.71, 0.76) | 0.74*** (0.71, 0.76) | 0.74*** (0.71, 0.76) |
| Classroom-level variables | ||||||
| Status hierarchy - linear | −0.02 (−0.08, 0.05) | 0.08 (−0.09, 0.25) | −0.04 (−0.14, 0.06) | 0.00 (−0.05, 0.05) | 0.02 (−0.25, 0.28) | 0.00 (−0.08, 0.09) |
| Status hierarchy - quadratic | – | −0.11 (−0.28, 0.07) | – | – | −0.01 (−0.27, 0.25) | – |
| Structure of status hierarchy | 0.00 (−0.06, 0.07) | 0.01 (−0.05, 0.08) | 0.01 (−0.06, 0.08) | −0.00 (−0.06, 0.04) | −0.00 (−0.06, 0.04) | −0.00 (−0.07, 0.06) |
| Classroom size | −0.05† (−0.10, 0.01) | −0.05† (−0.10, 0.00) | −0.05† (−0.11, 0.00) | −0.05 (−0.10, 0.01) | −0.05 (−0.10, 0.01) | −0.05 (−0.10, 0.01) |
| Classroom proportion of boys | −0.00 (−0.05, 0.04) | −0.00 (−0.05, 0.04) | −0.00 (−0.05, 0.04) | −0.00 (−0.05, 0.04) | −0.00 (−0.05, 0.04) | −0.00 (−0.05, 0.05) |
| Mean level of popularity | – | – | 0.02 (−0.05, 0.10) | – | – | 0.00 (−0.07, 0.08) |
Standardized coefficients are presented
†p < 0.10. ***p < 0.001