Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 23;8(12):3284–3292. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011049

Table 3.

Cumulative incidence of 12-month NRM for key subsets using the threshold corresponding to the concordance probability

Subset AUC ST2+REG3α
AUC AREG
CI 12 mo NRM P value Correctly classified CI 12 mo NRM P value Correctly classified
Validation cohort (n = 374)
 Minnesota high risk (n = 53) 0.689 24% vs 48% .083 29 (55%) 0.780 8% vs 53% .013 33 (62%)
 Minnesota standard risk (n = 321) 0.720 9% vs 34% <.001 250 (79%) 0.636 11% vs 21% .003 200 (62%)
 LGI involvement (n = 109) 0.790 12% vs 48% <.001 73 (67%) 0.773 8% vs 45% <.001 66 (61%)
 Skin only involvement (n = 199) 0.629 8% vs 22% <.001 155 (79%) 0.563 10% vs 13% .218 129 (65%)
 PT-CY prophylaxis (n = 133) 0.717 12% vs 35% <.001 100 (75%) 0.595 14% vs 21% .22 83 (62%)
 Systemically treated (n = 321) 0.739 12% vs 39% <.001 231 (72%) 0.693 12% vs 30% <.001 195 (61%)
Systemically treated subset (n = 321)
 Minnesota high risk (n = 52) 0.679 26% vs 48% .116 28 (54%) 0.780 8% vs 54% .011 33 (63%)
 Minnesota standard risk (n = 269) 0.700 12% vs 35% <.001 203 (75%) 0.617 13% vs 23% .022 162 (60%)
 LGI involvement (n = 104) 0.777 14% vs 49% <.001 68 (65%) 0.768 9% vs 46% <.001 63 (61%)
 Skin only involvement (n = 158) 0.610 11% vs 24% .034 116 (73%) 0.555 13% vs 16% .489 99 (63%)
 PT-CY prophylaxis (n = 125) 0.711 13% vs 35% .005 94 (75%) 0.592 16% vs 23% .233 72 (58%)

LGI, lower gastrointestinal tract.