Papp 2003 (P).
Methods | DESIGN Between‐patient Participant delivery ALLOCATION Random Method of randomisation: computer‐generated random code Concealment: adequate BLINDING Double‐blind (participant/investigator) WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT Described | |
Participants | N: 1043
Treatment duration: 4 wks; FU: 4 wks
LF: 15 (1.4%)
BC: yes
Age: 47.1
Gender (per cent men): 58.4%
Severity: mean PASI = 10.8 (range = 1 to 36)
Duration: 18.7 years INCLUSION CRITERIA
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
|
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Leo Pharmaceuticals sponsored the trial. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Treatments were assigned by computer‐generated code and assigned chronologically at each centre. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The trial was double‐blind (participant/investigator), and treatments were identifiable only by a code number. |
Randomisation method reported | Low risk | Randomisation was computer‐generated. (3:3:3:1) |
Loss to follow up | Low risk | 1.4% |
Baseline assessments | Low risk | ‐ |
Baseline comparability demonstrated | Low risk | ‐ |