Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD005028. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005028.pub3

Scarpa 1997.

Methods DESIGN 
 Within‐patient
 Participant delivery
 ALLOCATION 
 Random
 Method of randomisation: not reported; tubes labelled left or right and with participant ID number and tube ID number
 Concealment: unclear
 BLINDING 
 Double‐blind (participant/investigator)
 WITHDRAWAL/DROPOUT 
 Described
Participants N: 157
Treatment duration: 6 wks; FU: 7 wks
LF: 23 (14.6%)
BC: yes
Age: 49 (15SD; N = 134)
Gender (per cent men): 65.6% (N = 157)
Severity: TSS (0 to 12) = 7.7
INCLUSION CRITERIA
  • Stable chronic plaque psoriasis

  • Symmetrical lesions

  • In‐ and outpatients


EXCLUSION CRITERIA
  • Pregnancy

  • Lactation

  • Inadequate contraception

  • Recent systemic, light, or topical therapy

  • Severe renal failure

  • Liver and cardiac dysfunction

  • Hypercalcemia

  • Hyperphosphoremia

  • AIDS

  • Drug addiction

Interventions
  • Tacalcitol ointment 4 mcg/g OD (T)

  • Placebo (vehicle) OD (P)

Outcomes
  1. Signs: scaling; erythema; scaling

  2. TSS (0 to 12)

  3. Patient compliance (tube count; tube contents)

Notes The trial did not report sponsorship, but Istituto Gentili SpA provided medications and appeared to have undertaken the randomisation.
 There was SD imputation (TSS).
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk The trial reported insufficient details.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The trial was double‐blind (participant/investigator).
Randomisation method reported Unclear risk The trial did not report this.
Loss to follow up Low risk 14.6%
Baseline assessments Low risk
Baseline comparability demonstrated Low risk