Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2017 Mar 14;29(4):1333–1351. doi: 10.1017/S095457941700030X

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and correlations of study variables (N = 238)

Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

  1. T1 family SES
  2. T1 child IQ .17*
  3. T1 Effortful Control Behavioral Batterya .16* .33***
  4. T1 inhibitory control moma .15* .27*** .33***
  5. T1 inhibitory control dada −.05 .11 .28** .44***
  6. T1 attentional focusing moma .15* .17* .26*** .42*** .19*
  7. T1 attentional focusing dada .09 .11 .20* .24** .42*** .46***
  8. T1 false belief predictionb −.01 .13 .23** .08 −.02 −.04 −.06
  9. T1 false belief explanationb .10 .34*** .31*** .37*** .30*** .07 .06 .34***
10. T1 maternal nurturancec .05 .23** .13 .28*** −.08 .24*** −.08 .10 .11
11. T1 maternal responsivenessc .03 .08 .04 .19** −.04 .29*** −.03 .06 .04 .47***
12. T1 parental harsh discipline −.19** −.07 −.20** −.32*** −.18* −.16* −.04 −.16* −.19** −.18** −.21**
13. T1 child EXT −.12 −.06 −.15* −.43*** −.29*** −.33*** −.12 −.02 −.10 −.14* −.22** .28***
14. T2 child EXT −.03 −.02 −.09 −.35*** −.27** −.24*** −.12 −.11 −.16* −.13 −.15* .24*** .46***
15. T3 child EXT −.04 −.05 −.05 −.34*** −.22* −.21** −.15 −.09 −.09 −.06 −.01 .21** .44*** .59***
M 54.44 −0.01 0.00 4.59 4.47 4.68 4.51 0.63 0.96 5.37 5.49 6.32 0.36 0.27 0.24
SD 10.83 0.79 0.55 0.72 0.73 0.85 0.76 1.15 1.46 0.56 0.52 6.87 0.28 0.25 0.26

Note: SES, Socioeconomic status; T1, Time 1 age 3; EXT, externalizing behavior; T2, Time 2 age 5; T3, Time 3 age 10.

a

The Effortful Control Behavioral Battery, inhibitory control, and attentional focusing were averaged into child effortful control.

b

False belief prediction and explanation were summed into child theory of mind.

c

Maternal nurturance and responsiveness were averaged into maternal warmth.

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.