Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 28;10(2):e004187. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004187

Table 2.

Comparison of the frequency of traditional CVRFs in men and women depending on the degree of inflammation at the time of disease diagnosis

N Frequency of CVRF at the time of diagnosis N Frequency of CVRF at the time of enrolment
Normal APR at diagnosis, n (%) Increased APR at diagnosis, n (%) P value Normal APR at diagnosis, n (%) Increased APR at diagnosis, n (%) P value
Hypertension
 Men 57 25 (15) 32 (23) 0.066 90 34 (19) 56 (37) <0.001*
Women 28 8 (10) 20 (21) 0.060 39 11 (14) 28 (28) 0.026*
Dyslipidaemia
 Men 80 35 (20) 45 (31) 0.033* 115 53 (30) 62 (41) 0.042*
 Women 36 12 (16) 24 (24) 0.16 52 19 (24) 33 (33) 0.21
Obesity
 Men 22 13 (8) 9 (7) 0.64 90 34 (19) 56 (37) 0.047*
 Women 21 8 (11) 13 (15) 0.50 39 11 (14) 28 (28) 0.032*
Diabetes mellitus
 Men 4 4 (2) 0 (0) 0.13 24 14 (8) 10 (7) 0.61
 Women 5 1 (1) 4 (4) 0.31 11 1 (1) 10 (10) 0.024*

Normal APR: CRP <3 mg/L and ESR <15 mm/first hour at diagnosis.

Increased APR: CRP >3 mg/L and/or ESR ≥15 mm/first hour at diagnosis.

Values in bold meant that the differences were statistically significant

*P<0.05.

APR, acute phase reactant; CRP, C reactive protein; CVRF, cardiovascular risk factor; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate.