Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 19;54(3):161–176. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2300140007

Table 6. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses examining the association of significant risk indicators with peri-implant mucositis after adjusting for age and smoking status.

Clinical groups/parameters Casesa) Univariate analysis Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis
Unadjusted OR (95% CI) P valueb) Adjusted OR (95% CI) P valueb)
Oral hygiene status <0.001 0.001
Good/acceptable 39 (30.7) Referent
Poor 88 (69.3) 2.3 (1.4–3.7) 2.3 (1.4–3.8)
Current periodontal status <0.001 <0.001
Periodontal health 21 (16.5) Referent
Gingivitis/periodontitis 106 (83.5) 3.3 (1.9–5.8) 3.4 (1.9–6.0)
Preoperative alveolar ridge status <0.001 <0.001
Adequate (thick tissue biotype) 43 (33.9) Referent
Deficient (horizontal, vertical, or combined defects) 84 (66.1) 2.6 (1.6–4.2) 2.7 (1.6–4.4)
Implant placement protocol <0.001 <0.001
Immediate 17 (13.4) Referent
Early/delayed 110 (86.6) 3.2 (1.8–5.9) 3.5 (1.8–6.5)
Implant length <0.001 <0.001
>11.0 mm 45 (35.4) Referent
≤11.0 mm 82 (64.6) 2.9 (1.8–4.6) 2.9 (1.8–4.6)
Quality of coronal restoration 0.003 0.003
Satisfactory 95 (74.8) Referent
Poor 32 (25.2) 2.6 (1.4–4.9) 2.7 (1.4–5.0)

OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.

a)Data based on the number of implants within each parameter. b)Wald test.