Abstract
Glaucoma, an irreversible optic neuropathy, primarily affects retinal ganglion cells (RGC) and causes vision loss and blindness. The damage to RGCs in glaucoma occurs by various mechanisms, including elevated intraocular pressure, oxidative stress, inflammation, and other neurodegenerative processes. As the disease progresses, the loss of RGCs leads to vision loss. Therefore, protecting RGCs from damage and promoting their survival are important goals in managing glaucoma. In this regard, resveratrol (RES), a polyphenolic phytoalexin, exerts antioxidant effects and slows down the evolution and progression of glaucoma. The present review shows that RES plays a protective role in RGCs in cases of ischemic injury and hypoxia as well as in ErbB2 protein expression in the retina. Additionally, RES plays protective roles in RGCs by promoting cell growth, reducing apoptosis, and decreasing oxidative stress in H2O2‐exposed RGCs. RES was also found to inhibit oxidative stress damage in RGCs and suppress the activation of mitogen‐activated protein kinase signaling pathways. RES could alleviate retinal function impairment by suppressing the hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1 alpha/vascular endothelial growth factor and p38/p53 axes while stimulating the PI3K/Akt pathway. Therefore, RES might exert potential therapeutic effects for managing glaucoma by protecting RGCs from damage and promoting their survival.
Keywords: glaucoma, ischemic‐reperfusion injury, oxidative stress, resveratrol, retinal ganglion cells
Resveratrol (RES) exerts antioxidant and antiapoptotic effects on retinal ganglion cells (RGC) through various cellular and molecular mechanisms. First, RES has been found to protect RGCs from damage induced by oxidative stress and inflammation. It inhibits hypoxia‐induced RGC mortality by downregulating apoptosis and the production of ErbB2, a protein implicated in cell survival and proliferation. Additionally, RES has been shown to promote cell growth, reduce apoptosis, and decrease oxidative stress in RGCs exposed to H2O2. It also protects RGC axons by preventing the phosphorylation of c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase proteins through Sirt1. Furthermore, RES can reduce the loss of RGCs and impairment of retinal function caused by ischemic‐reperfusion injury by suppressing the HIF‐1α/vascular endothelial growth factor and p38/p53 pathways, which are implicated in cell death and inflammation, and activating the PI3K/Akt pathway, which promotes cell survival and growth. RES also prevents oxidative stress damage to RGCs and suppresses the activation of mitogen‐activated protein kinase signaling pathways. These mechanisms collectively contribute to the neuroprotective effects of RES on RGCs in glaucoma.

1. INTRODUCTION
Glaucoma, a primary cause of blindness worldwide, is a neurodegenerative disease. 1 Early diagnosis and proper management are important to prevent visual impairment. 2 According to the study by the World Health Organization, approximately 3% of the global population aged 40–80 years, equivalent to about 76 million people, are expected to be affected by glaucoma. 3 Regular eye examinations and early detection are essential in managing glaucoma and preventing visual impairment. 4 Glaucoma has two fundamental types: primary open‐angle glaucoma (POAG) and angle‐closure glaucoma (ACG). 5 , 6 POAG, the most common type, often has an unknown cause but is associated with hereditary factors, age‐related changes in the eye, and increased intraocular pressure (IOP) due to reduced aqueous humor outflow. 7 , 8 On the contrary, ACG occurs when there is a blockage in the drainage angle connecting the iris and the cornea, leading to a sudden increase in IOP. 9
One main cause of glaucoma is oxidative stress, which significantly contributes to the progression of glaucoma and damages the retinal ganglion cells (RGC). 10
RGCs are neurons located in the innermost layer of the retina, known as the ganglion cell layer (GCL). 11 These cells are responsible for transmitting visual information from the retina to the brain through the optic nerve. 12 RGCs play an important role in the visual processing system, as they collect visual input from other retinal cells and send signals to the brain for interpretation and processing. 13 The death of RGCs can be caused by the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), particularly hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). 14 This apoptosis is one of the main reasons for the progression of glaucoma. 15 Oxidative stress can also affect the activity of antioxidant enzymes, which reduces their ability to neutralize ROS and protect against oxidative damage. This further contributes to the degeneration of RGCs and the development of glaucoma. 16 , 17 Furthermore, oxidative stress can trigger various signaling pathways, including those associated with apoptosis and mitogen‐activated protein kinases (MAPK), which are implicated in cell death and inflammation‐related cascades. These pathways lead to the death of RGCs and the development of glaucoma. Therefore, protecting RGCs from ROS‐induced apoptosis could be an effective strategy to mitigate or prevent glaucoma. 18
The choice of treatment for glaucoma depends on various factors such as the patients' overall health, the type and stage of glaucoma, and their adherence to therapy. 19 , 20 Regular monitoring and follow‐up are necessary to determine the success rates of treatment and prevent further visual loss. 21 Medical therapy is typically the primary treatment option, involving the use of eye drops or oral medications to reduce IOP. 22 Selective laser trabeculoplasty is a laser treatment intended to lower IOP in individuals with glaucoma. 23 Surgical procedures, such as trabeculectomy or microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), are typically reserved for patients who are unresponsive to or unable to receive medication or laser treatment. 24 Moreover, natural substances like antioxidants have shown potential for treating glaucoma. 25 Antioxidants play an important role in combating oxidative stress. 26 Studies have shown that antioxidants like resveratrol (RES), curcumin, and vitamins C and E, as well as carotenoids such as lutein and zeaxanthin, have protective effects on RGCs and the optic nerve. 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 RES is found in cereals, fruits, vegetables, and red wine. 32 , 33 It has been shown to possess antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and antiapoptotic activities. These properties are beneficial in protecting RGCs against oxidative stress and inflammation. 31 , 34 Additionally, RES inhibits hypoxia‐induced death of RGCs by downregulating apoptosis and promoting the production of ErbB2. 35
ErbB2, also known as HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), is a gene that encodes a 185‐kDa transmembrane glycoprotein belonging to the epidermal growth factor receptor family. It is a receptor tyrosine kinase with intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity. 36
This review article focuses on in vitro experimental studies that illustrate the efficiency of RES in protecting RGCs from injury. The review also provides insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of RES and its potential as an adjuvant treatment for glaucoma. The antioxidant and antiapoptotic properties of RES contribute to its therapeutic potential in alleviating the signs and symptoms of glaucoma.
2. OVERVIEW OF RES
2.1. Chemistry of RES
RES was discovered by Takaoka in 1939, who isolated the compound from the root of Veratrum grandiflorum. 37 RES is a natural polyphenol with the chemical formula C14H12O3. It consists of a stilbene backbone, which is a double‐bonded phenyl group connected to another phenyl group by a double bond. 38 , 39 RES has three hydroxyl groups (–OH) attached to the phenyl rings, located at positions 3, 5, and 4′. 40 The structure of RES enables it to exist in different geometric arrangements, including cis and trans isomers (Figure 1). 41 RES is abundant in grapes, particularly in their skins and kernels, with red grapes having a higher level of RES than green grapes. 42 , 43 Moreover, red wine contains RES due to the presence of grape skins during the fermentation process. 44 RES is also present in peanuts and peanut products like peanut butter, although the amounts may vary based on the processing and roasting procedures. 45
FIGURE 1.

Structures of trans‐ and cis‐RES (resveratrol). 46
2.2. RES metabolism
RES has a high absorption rate in the small intestine, likely due to its small, nonpolar shape. When it is administered orally, about 75% of the dose of trans‐RES is efficiently absorbed by the human body, and the absorption can be further maximized by consuming dietary fat. 47 , 48 , 49 However, its bioavailability is limited due to its quick metabolism, which leads to the production of different metabolites such as RES glucuronides and RES sulfates. 50 Once absorbed, RES and its metabolites enter the systemic circulation and are distributed to peripheral tissues, including adipose tissue. 51 The absorption of RES occurs through a quick process of passive diffusion, as demonstrated in Caco‐2 cells. Transepithelial diffusion is responsible for approximately 70%–75% of the absorption of RES. 52 , 53 The absorption of RES can be greatly enhanced, resulting in about a fourfold increase in plasma concentration, when it is in the micronized form. 54 , 55 Micronized RES has been proven to have a considerably enhanced absorption rate compared to nonmicronized RES. 56 Extensive phase II metabolism occurs in both the gut and liver after oral administration of RES, leading to the generation of different metabolites. The primary metabolites of RES include RES‐3‐O‐glucuronide, RES‐3‐O‐sulfate, and RES‐4′‐O‐glucuronide. Additional metabolites such as RES diglucuronide, RES sulfoglucuronide isomers, RES glucuronide isomers, and RES sulfate have also been found in some studies. 57 , 58 , 59
2.3. RES biological properties
RES exhibits antioxidant effects by scavenging free radicals and decreasing oxidative damage to cells and tissues. It demonstrates a defensive impact against lipid peroxidation in cellular membranes and DNA harm induced by ROS. 53 , 60 Additionally, RES upregulates the activity of several antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT). 32 In RGCs, RES increases the levels of SOD, CAT, and glutathione. 18 Moreover, RES exhibits anti‐inflammatory characteristics by inhibiting the synthesis of pro‐inflammatory molecules and altering inflammatory signaling pathways. 61 This can help reduce inflammation and improve overall wellness. Furthermore, RES has metabolic regulatory effects such as enhancing mitochondrial function and energy metabolism. It can improve nutrient usage and metabolic efficiency, leading to enhanced growth performance and general metabolic health. 62 , 63 According to a thorough assessment of experimental in vivo and in vitro models of Parkinson's disease (PD), RES can cross the blood–brain barrier and prevent the development of the disease. Therefore, RES may have neuroprotective benefits by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation in the brain, which are significant factors in the development and progression of PD. 64
2.4. Toxicological studies
The recommended daily intake of RES has not been determined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or the European Food Safety Authority. 65 RES is considered a dietary supplement rather than a medication, so it does not have an official recommended daily allowance or dietary reference intake. However, studies have shown that a typical daily dose of RES for potential health benefits ranges from 150 to 500 mg. 66 , 67 While the dietary recommendation of RES depends on individual needs, RES is generally considered safe and well tolerated in humans at doses of up to 5 g/day. 68 However, some studies have reported potential adverse effects of RES, especially at high doses. These effects may include gastrointestinal symptoms as well as possible interactions with certain drugs. 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 Animal studies have also indicated possible harmful effects of high‐dose RES on the liver and kidneys. 73 , 74 Overall, RES is considered safe and well tolerated at standard doses, but further research is needed to fully understand the potential benefits and disadvantages of high‐dose RES supplementation.
3. OVERVIEW OF GLAUCOMA
The treatment options for glaucoma may include various therapies such as eye drops, laser treatment, or surgery. 75 The specific treatment approach depends on factors like the type and severity of glaucoma, the patient's overall health, and any underlying medical conditions. 76 Although treatment can slow down the progression of glaucoma, any vision loss that has already occurred is irreversible. The following are some common therapies used to manage glaucoma:
i. Medicines: eye drops or oral medications are typically used to reduce IOP. 77 The main objective of these drugs is to regulate the volume of fluid in the eye, known as aqueous humor, by either decreasing its production or increasing its outflow, to manage IOP. 78 Medications may need to be administered long term and require regular monitoring.
ii. Laser therapy: laser trabeculoplasty and laser peripheral iridotomy are two common laser techniques used to treat glaucoma. 79 Laser trabeculoplasty is a procedure that enhances the outflow of fluid from the eye. On the contrary, laser peripheral iridotomy involves creating a small hole in the iris, which helps facilitate fluid flow and alleviate pressure. 80 , 81
iii. Surgical procedures: in situations where medications and laser therapy fail to be effective, surgical interventions may be required. Trabeculectomy, which involves the creation of a new drainage channel, and drainage implant surgery are examples of surgical treatments used to lower IOP. 82 , 83 MIGS procedures are revolutionary surgical approaches that attempt to lower IOP with less stress and faster recovery compared with previous surgeries. 84 These operations involve the use of small devices or implants to enhance the outflow of fluid from the eye. 85
Several molecular pathways have been hypothesized to produce glaucoma, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial malfunction, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. 86 , 87 , 88 Oxidative stress has been identified to play a potential role in the development and progression of a spectrum of visual disorders such as glaucoma. 89 Disruption of the balance between free radical formation and antioxidant defenses can result in oxidative stress and damage to cells and tissues. 16 Oxidative damage to trabecular meshwork cells would promote RGC death followed by trabecular dysgenesis and IOP elevation due to aqueous flow obstruction. 90 Mitochondrial function dysregulation relates to the pathophysiology of glaucoma and is considered a primary component in its progression. 91 In glaucoma, malfunctioning mitochondria can decrease adenosine triphosphate (ATP) generation, cause oxidative stress, and decrease cellular metabolism . 92 Mitochondria play an important role in ROS formation. Dysfunctional mitochondria can lead to an imbalance in ROS production, causing oxidative stress that negatively impacts RGC survival. 31 ROS‐mediated effects and mitochondrial dynamics are interconnected in the context of retinal injury and neurodegeneration, highlighting the importance of mitochondrial health in protecting RGCs. 92 Moreover, in diabetic mice, retinal mitochondria experience increased oxidative damage, with elevated superoxide levels, decreased antioxidant defense systems, and altered electron transport complexes, particularly complex III, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in the retina. 93
Mitochondrial failure can induce apoptotic pathways, leading to the death of RGCs, which are the major cells involved in glaucoma. 94 In addition, investigations have demonstrated that hereditary factors play an essential role in the pathogenesis of glaucoma. Mutations in MYOC, OPTN, WDR36, and CYP1B1 are among the most widely reported genetic risk factors for the disease. These genes are implicated in maintaining the stability and proper functioning of mitochondria, ensuring they can produce energy efficiently. These genes also play a role in regulating the levels of ROS within cells to prevent oxidative stress. Therefore, understanding the roles of MYOC, OPTN, WDR36, and CYP1B1 genes in maintaining mitochondrial health and ROS balance is important for comprehending how genetic mutations in these genes can impact the risk of developing glaucoma. 95 , 96
4. NEUROPROTECTIVE EFFECTS OF RES ON RGCs IN GLAUCOMA
Glaucoma, a common global source of irreversible visual loss, significantly results in progressive loss of RGCs. 97 Understanding the activities of RGCs in glaucoma is important for establishing effective therapeutic techniques to protect and preserve these cells. Targeting the underlying processes of RGC destruction, such as lowering IOP, enhancing neuroprotection, and regulating inflammation, may help halt the course of glaucoma while preserving visual function. Several pathways are responsible for the pathophysiology of glaucoma, which eventually impair RGCs and result in vision loss. In this context, RES exerts several protective cellular and molecular effects on RGCs (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2.

Molecular mechanisms of resveratrol (RES) on RGCs (retinal ganglion cells). (A) RES suppresses the activation of JNK (c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase), p38, and p53 signaling pathways induced by ROS (reactive oxygen species); (B) RES suppresses the phosphorylation of JNK via Sirt1; (C) RES activates AMP‐activated protein kinase and leads to Sirt1 activation as well as inhibits autophagy; (D) RES promotes the transcription function of FoxOs and facilitates the transcription of antioxidative genes as well as activates SOD (superoxide dismutase); (E) RES inhibits HIF‐1α/VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) by downregulating PI3K/Akt.
One proposed mechanism is related to ischemic injury and ErbB2 signaling pathway. The retinal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury model is a method used to induce retinal damage in mice. 98 In this model, retinal I/R damage was induced by quickly cannulating the anterior chambers of both eyes of adult male C57BL/6 J mice with a stainless needle. 99 In the study by Luo et al., one eye of the mice was subjected to increased IOP above the systolic blood pressure for 60 min, whereas the other eye acted as the control and maintained a normal IOP. After the 60‐min period, the needle was removed from the eye, and the mice were killed at different time points (0, 1, 3, and 7 days) after I/R injury. The aim of this model was to induce retinal I/R damage in mice, which was subsequently utilized to evaluate the effects of RES on the loss of RGCs and impairment of retinal function. 100 ErbB2 belongs to the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases, which is also known as HER2. 101 It is a key component in controlling cell growth, survival, and differentiation. 102 ErbB2 is implicated in different cellular functions such as the control of the neurological system, heart, and mammary glands. 103 , 104 , 105 Seong et al. showed that RES successfully decreased retinal cell death caused by I/R injury in the GCL of the retina. This was demonstrated by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay, which showed a considerably larger number of TUNEL‐positive cells in the I/R group than in the control group. However, the I/R+RES group exhibited a much‐reduced number of TUNEL‐positive cells compared to the I/R group. The study demonstrated that RES efficiently lowered the expression of ErbB2 in the retina after I/R injury. These results emphasized the potential of RES as a therapeutic intervention to prevent hypoxia‐induced RGC death linked with ErbB2. 35 Moreover, ErbB2 is associated with apoptosis regulation, a critical cellular process linked to neuronal cell death. 35 As an upstream regulator, ErbB2 plays a significant role in controlling apoptosis, making it a major target in the modulation of cell death mechanisms. 35 The expression levels of ErbB2, affected by hypoxia, indicate its involvement in apoptosis regulation in RGCs. 35
Apoptosis involves the activation of enzymes caspase‐3 and cleaved caspase‐9. Caspase‐3, belonging to the caspase family of proteases, is a key enzyme in apoptosis. 106 This enzyme becomes active on receiving signals that trigger programmed cell death, such as DNA damage, cellular stress, or signaling from other caspases. 107 On activation, caspase‐3 initiates the cleavage and activation of distinct cellular proteins, leading to the typical changes linked with apoptosis. 108 These alterations include DNA fragmentation, cytoskeletal disintegration, nuclear condensation, and membrane blebbing. 109 Caspase‐9 plays a vital role in apoptosis and is classified as an initiator caspase due to its significant contribution to initiating the apoptotic cascade. 110 , 111 Caspase‐9 is primarily activated through the intrinsic or mitochondrial mechanism of apoptosis, which is triggered by cellular stressors like DNA or cellular damage. 112 The formation of the apoptosome complex, consisting of cytochrome c, Apaf‐1, and ATP, is essential in activating caspase‐9 in this pathway. 113 MAPKs are a group of enzymes that play an important role in various physiological functions, including cell proliferation, differentiation, survival, and response to external signals. 114 MAPKs participate in signal transduction pathways that transmit signals from the cell membrane to the nucleus, leading to changes in gene expression and cellular function. 115 The MAPK family consists of several components, including extracellular signal‐regulated kinases (ERKs), c‐Jun N‐terminal kinases (JNK), and p38 MAPKs. 116 , 117 Activation of each component of the MAPK family is driven by unique upstream kinases that respond to various stimuli. 118 ERKs are principally responsible for cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. 119 They are activated by growth factors, hormones, and mitogens, and their activation regulates genome activity and cellular proliferation. 120 , 121 JNKs play a role in stress reactions, inflammation, and apoptosis. They are activated by numerous stress signals, including UV radiation, thermal shock, and pro‐inflammatory cytokines. 122 , 123 , 124 p38 MAPKs are also engaged in stress reactions and inflammation. p38 MAPK activation can influence gene expression, cell cycle progression, and inflammatory responses. 125 , 126 , 127 Ye and Meng observed that RES has protective effects on H2O2‐induced apoptosis in RGCs. The study demonstrated that H2O2 enhanced the levels of cleaved caspase‐3 and caspase‐9, which are important for beginning and driving apoptosis, but RES counteracted this impact. This finding demonstrates that RES has high antioxidant capabilities against H2O2‐induced damage in RGCs. Additionally, the researchers noted that RES was able to decrease ERK, JNK, and p38 signaling pathways in RGC‐5 cells caused by H2O2. These three MAPKs contributed to intracellular metabolism control and response to external stress. The study suggests that the protective effects of RES may be attributed to the inhibition of these MAPK pathways. 18
IOP following glaucoma is the major origin of ischemic injury. Hypoxia in the retina and optic nerve of glaucomatous eyes activates several factors like HIF‐1α. HIF‐1α is a transcription factor that is necessary for maintaining cellular homeostasis in response to oxygen deprivation produced by tissue ischemia and is primarily present in the nucleus and cytoplasm of cells. 128 , 129 The HIF‐1 complex is formed by the dimerization of HIF‐1α and HIF‐1β, which in turn promote the activation of genes involved in erythropoiesis, neuroprotection, angiogenesis, apoptosis, and necrosis. 130 , 131 Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a signaling molecule, plays a vital role in the process of angiogenesis. 132 VEGF supports the formation of endothelial cells, which are the building blocks of blood vessels. 133 It contributes to various physiological activities, including embryonic development, wound healing, and production of new blood vessels in response to tissue ischemia. 134 However, excessive or dysregulated expression of VEGF can lead to pathological situations, such as retinal neovascularization and vascular leakage. 135 The research conducted by Ji et al. indicated that RES protected RGCs by decreasing the HIF‐1α/VEGF and p38/p53 signaling axes as well as increasing the PI3K/Akt pathway. The HIF‐1α/VEGF axis is connected with retinal ischemia injury, whereas the p38/p53 pathway is responsible for RGC apoptosis. Additionally, the PI3K/Akt pathway enhanced cell survival and inhibited apoptosis. RES treatment reduced the overexpression of the HIF‐1α/VEGF and p38/p53 pathways during I/R injury although activating the downregulation of the PI3K/Akt pathway. This led to an increase in retinal function after injury‐induced functional damage, demonstrating that RES could ameliorate retinal ischemia injury–induced RGC loss and retinal function degradation. 99
As mentioned, oxidative stress and apoptosis are the most important mechanisms in retinal degeneration in glaucoma. Sirtuins are one of the protective proteins against oxidative stress and RGC death. Sirtuin‐1 (Sirt1) is a member of the sirtuin family of proteins that are nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide–dependent deacetylases. 136 Sirt1 plays a role in several cellular processes, including antiapoptosis, antiaging, and regulation of genomic activity and metabolism. 137 , 138 It is considered a therapeutic target for the treatment of neurodegenerative illnesses such as Alzheimer's disease, PD, and polyglutamine disease. 139 , 140 According to Wu et al., RES has a favorable impact on RGCs and their axons after retinal I/R injury. This research demonstrated that RES could protect RGC axons from damage by decreasing the phosphorylation of JNK proteins via Sirt1. These results revealed that RES may have therapeutic implications in optic nerve degeneration. 34 Moreover, the stimulation of Bax leads to permanent destruction to mitochondria, regulates the release of apoptotic proteins, and finally prompts caspase activation to launch the apoptotic cascade. 141 The intrinsic apoptotic axis begins with Bax activation, followed by pore formation in the mitochondrial outer membrane that occurs from Bax activation, dimerization, and oligomerization. 142 This results in the release of signaling molecules such as cytochrome c, which finally stimulates the start of caspases, particularly cleaved caspase‐3. 143 Phosphorylated‐Akt, the active version of the protein Akt, is a serine/threonine kinase that plays an important role in cell survival, proliferation, and many cellular activities. 144 Akt can be activated via phosphorylation, leading to its activation and subsequent signaling cascade. 145 Phosphorylation of Akt at certain locations, such as serine 473 and threonine 308, results in its activation and enables it to phosphorylate downstream targets related to cell survival and growth pathways. 146 Sirt1 was discovered by Luo et al. as a required component for the neuroprotective activities of RES on RGCs after retinal I/R damage in mice. The most effective concentration of RES was found to be 100 μmol/L. The increase in Sirt1 levels caused by RES was found to have a significant impact on RGC apoptosis, leading to increased levels of phospho‐Akt and lower expressions of Bax and cleaved caspase‐3. 100
Mitochondrial dysfunction is another destructive mechanism in glaucoma that leads to RGC loss. R28 cells are retinal neuronal‐like cells that were first obtained from the retina of postnatal day 1 rat and have been defined as a model for RGCs. 147 R28 cells have been employed in several investigations to examine the processes of RGC mortality and to evaluate prospective treatment medications for RGC injury. 148 Optic atrophy 1 (Opa1) plays a vital role in mitochondrial fusion and modification of crista structures. 149 Opa1 is in the inner mitochondrial membrane and participates in the preservation of mitochondrial shape, function, and dynamics. 150 Opa1 regulates mitochondrial fusion by encouraging the fusion of the inner mitochondrial membrane, which is required for the preservation of mitochondrial function and crista structure. 151 SOD is an enzyme that performs an important function in antioxidant defense mechanisms within cells. 16 SOD neutralizes damaging superoxide radicals, which are extremely reactive chemicals that can produce oxidative injury to cells. 152 By converting superoxide radicals into less‐damaging molecules, SOD lowers oxidative stress and contributes to the preservation of cellular health. 53 Pang et al. revealed that RES exerts protective effects on retinal injuries induced by I/R and serum deprivation. The treatment of RES increased the vitality of retinal cells (R28 cells) and somewhat relieved apoptosis. Additionally, the researchers showed that RES altered Opa1 expression and SOD activity, both of which are expected to enhance the protective effects of RES on RGCs. 31
Another important targeting factor is Brn‐3a to protect RGCs in glaucoma. Brn‐3a is a transcription factor that belongs to the brain‐specific homeobox/POU domain protein family. 153 This protein is necessary for the formation and survival of RGCs by regulating gene expression required for RGC development and function. Brn‐3a is selectively expressed in RGCs, where it is important for their development and function. 154 SMI‐32, a monoclonal antibody, specifically targets a nonphosphorylated epitope of the neurofilament heavy chain. 155 This antibody is often used as a marker for mature neurons, such as RGCs. 156 Brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a member of the neurotrophin family of growth factors and contributes to the development and maintenance of the nervous system. 157 BDNF is a member of the neurotrophin family of growth factors and contributes to the development and maintenance of the nervous system. 158 Tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB), is activated by interacting with BDNF and other neurotrophins. 159 Activation of TrkB signaling pathways enhances cell survival, synaptic plasticity, and neuroprotection. 160 The results of the experiments by Cao et al. revealed that RES, injected intravitreally, protected RGCs from high IOP‐induced cell death through several mechanisms, making it a promising therapeutic intervention for glaucoma. In particular, they showed that intravitreal injection of 30‐μmol/L RES remarkably enhanced the expression of Sirt1 and reduced ROS production in RGCs, improved Brn‐3a and SMI‐32 expression, and caused a large reduction in TUNEL‐positive cells in RGCs. The effects of RES on BDNF in Müller glial cells (MGCs) and TrkB expression in RGCs were studied in this work. RES treatment increased BDNF gene expression in MGCs. In particular, exposure to 140‐μmol/L RES led to a substantial increase in BDNF gene expression, unlike the control group. Additionally, the study confirmed the increase in TrkB expression in RGCs after RES therapy. These findings suggested that RES promotes BDNF–TrkB signaling between MGCs and RGCs, which is important for the preservation and survival of RGCs. 161
Besides oxidative stress, inflammation plays a major role in glaucoma. 162 Glaucoma is linked to chronic low‐grade inflammation in the retina and optic nerve. 163 Inflammation can contribute to the progression of glaucoma through various mechanisms:
i. Stimulation of immune cells: in reaction to injury or stress, immune cells such as microglia and astrocytes in the retina and optic nerve become activated and release pro‐inflammatory mediators (IL‐1β, IL‐6, and TNFα). 164 , 165 This activation can lead to the production of cytokines and chemokines, which can contribute to neuronal injury and cell death. 166 ROS can act as signaling molecules in inflammatory processes. They can modulate the activity of transcription factors like nuclear factor kappa B, which regulates the expression of pro‐inflammatory genes, leading to the production of cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules involved in inflammation. 167 Additionally, ROS can induce oxidative damage in cells, causing the release of damage‐associated molecular patterns and activating the inflammasome assembly, leading to the production of pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐1β and IL‐18. 168 , 169
ii. Gliosis: gliosis refers to the reaction of glial cells, such as astrocytes and Müller cells, to injury or stress. 170 In glaucoma, gliosis is characterized by the proliferation and hypertrophy of glial cells. Gliosis can lead to the formation of a glial scar, which can impair the regeneration and function of neurons. 171
iii. Excitotoxicity: inflammation can release excitatory neurotransmitters, such as glutamate, which can cause excitotoxicity and neuronal death. 172 Excitotoxicity is believed to be a major contributor to RGC death in glaucoma. 173
Overall, inflammation in glaucoma is associated with the loss of RGCs and damage to the optic nerve. Targeting inflammation and its pathways could potentially be a therapeutic approach for treating glaucoma. According to Luo et al., treatment with RES may effectively prevent RGC cell death and reduce inflammation associated with gliosis after I/R damage. The study demonstrated a decrease in TUNEL labeling, inhibition of the early increase in the proapoptotic protein Bax, and a subsequent decrease in the levels of cleaved caspase‐3, all indicating the antiapoptotic properties of RES. These findings suggest that RES may prevent RGC cell death by blocking the apoptotic pathway dependent on Bax and caspase‐3. Thus, RES could be a valuable treatment option for glaucoma caused by I/R injury. 174
ER stress is another pathway responsible for the destructive mechanisms of glaucoma. The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a cellular stress response pathway that is activated when there is an aggregation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER. 175 The main goal of the UPR is to restore ER homeostasis and promote cell survival. 176 UPR proteins consist of molecular chaperones and transcription factors that play an important role in the UPR pathway. Some examples of UPR proteins are provided here.
Binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP, also known as GRP‐78) is an ER chaperone that assists in protein folding and prevents protein aggregation. 177 It is upregulated during ER stress and helps to properly fold unfolded proteins. 178
i. The transcription factor C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), also known as DNA damage‐inducible transcript 3 or growth and DNA damage protein‐153, is induced during ER stress. 179 CHOP is involved in regulating the gene expression responsible for ER stress signaling and apoptosis. 180
ii. X‐box binding protein‐1 (XBP‐1) is a transcription factor that is activated during ER stress and plays an important role in regulating genes associated with protein folding, ER‐associated degradation, and lipid metabolism. 181
According to Lindsey et al., RES supplementation may stop the loss of RGC dendrites after optic nerve damage. Additionally, optic nerve compression altered the expression of specific UPR proteins, such as BiP, CHOP, and XBP‐1. However, this effect was less significant in mice that received RES in their diet. These findings suggest that long‐term RES supplementation in the diet can protect against RGC dendrite loss and regulate the UPR in the retina after optic nerve damage. 182
Optic nerve transection (ONT) is a surgical treatment utilized in animal models to simulate optic nerve injury. In this surgery, the optic nerve is intentionally cut or severed, often in a controlled and standardized manner. 183 The objective of ONT is to produce a model that simulates optic nerve injury or degeneration, allowing researchers to evaluate the impacts of such damage on RGCs and explore novel neuroprotective therapies. 184 In the ONT procedure, an incision is made in the lateral conjunctiva, and the optic nerve is exposed through blunt dissection. A longitudinal incision is then made in the optic nerve sheath, and a cross section of the optic nerve is formed, avoiding harming the surrounding blood supply. After the surgery, the incision is repaired with sutures, and suitable ophthalmic ointment is given. 184 According to another study by Kim et al., the neuroprotective efficacy of RES was evaluated in an ONT model. The results demonstrated that administration of ≥3.1 μmol/L of RES exhibited a substantial neuroprotective impact on the RGCs of the RES‐treated group compared with the control group. The number of RGCs in eyes treated with RES was substantially larger than that in eyes treated with a control drug (Phosphate buffered saline) in transected rats. The study demonstrated that RES may exert a therapeutic effect in treating optic nerve illnesses via activating the Sirt1 pathway and exhibiting its neuroprotective effects. 185
Additionally, riluzole reduces glutamate release and blocks voltage‐gated sodium channels. 186 , 187 These activities of riluzole help minimize excitotoxicity and prevent the degeneration of RGCs. 188 In addition, riluzole possesses antioxidant capabilities and can protect RGCs from oxidative stress–induced damage to the optic nerve. 188 Pirhan et al. revealed that both riluzole and RES, when taken alone or in combination, significantly slowed RGC degradation in an experimental glaucoma paradigm. According to this study, RES therapy was found to have a substantial effect on RGC density in the experimental glaucoma paradigm. The RGC density in the group undergoing RES therapy was found to be the highest among all groups. 188
Table 1 presents a summary of the study results.
TABLE 1.
Studies consistent with the purpose of this study.
| Authors | Dosage of RES | Type of study/model | Mechanisms |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seong et al. 35 | 20 mg/kg | Mice | RES reduced the expression of ErbB2 protein in the retina after I/R injury |
| Ye and Meng 18 | 5, 10, or 20 μmol/L | RGC‐5 cells | RES suppressed the activation of ERK, JNK, and p38 signaling pathways in RGC‐5 cells induced by H2O2 |
| Ji et al. 99 | 20 mg/kg | Mice | RES suppressed the overexpression of the HIF‐1a/VEGF and p38/p53 pathways after I/R injury while activating the downregulation of the PI3K/Akt pathway |
| Wu et al. 34 | 250 mg/kg | Rat | RES protected RGC axons from injuries by suppressing the phosphorylation of JNK proteins via Sirt1 |
| Pang et al. 31 | 2 mg/kg | Rat | RES enhanced the viability of retinal cells (R28 cells) and partially alleviated apoptosis |
| Cao et al. 161 | 1 μL of 3 μmol/L or 30 μmol/L (intravitreal injection) | Mice | RES elevated Sirt1 expression and reduced the production of ROS in RGCs, improved Brn‐3a and SMI‐32 expressions, and caused a marked reduction in TUNEL‐positive cells in RGCs |
| Luo et al. 100 | 10, 50, and 100 μmol/L (intravitreal injection) | Mice | RES elevated the levels of phospho‐Akt and decreased the expressions of Bax and cleaved caspase‐3 |
| Luo et al. 174 | 250 mg/kg | Rat | RES inhibited RGC death by blocking the Bax‐caspase‐3‐dependent apoptotic pathway, indicating its potential therapeutic effectiveness against glaucoma‐induced I/R injury |
| Pirhan et al. 188 | 10 mg/kg | Rat | RES delayed the production of RGCs |
Abbreviations: ERK, extracellular signal‐regulated kinase; HIF‐1a, hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1 alpha; IR, ischemia/reperfusion; JNK, c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase; RES, resveratrol; RGC, retinal ganglion cell; ROS, reactive oxygen species; Sirt1, sirtuin‐1; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
5. CONCLUSIONS
Numerous antioxidants have been studied for possible therapeutic benefits in the management of glaucoma. These include natural antioxidants such as RES and curcumin, vitamins C and E, and carotenoids such as lutein and zeaxanthin. These antioxidants have been reported to exert neuroprotective effects on RGCs and may be advantageous in the prevention and treatment of glaucoma by protecting RGCs from damage and encouraging their survival. RES is a natural polyphenol found in numerous plants such as grapes and berries. The findings showed that (1) RES exerts cellular and molecular effects on RGCs by promoting cell growth, reducing apoptosis, and decreasing oxidative stress in H2O2‐exposed RGCs; (2) RES can protect RGC axons by preventing the phosphorylation of JNK proteins through Sirt1; (3) RES can reduce the loss of RGCs and impairment of retinal function caused by IR injury: this impact occurs by suppressing the HIF‐1α/VEGF and p38/p53 pathways, which are implicated in cell death and inflammation, while activating the PI3K/Akt pathway, which promotes cell survival and growth; and (4) RES prevents oxidative stress damage in RGCs and suppresses the activation of MAPK signaling axis. This study explored the therapeutic potential of RES in protecting RGCs from glaucoma‐induced cell death. Our findings revealed that intravitreal treatment of RES efficiently rescued RGCs from high IOP‐induced cell death through various routes. These data show that RES may have therapeutic potential for glaucoma therapy. However, further investigations are required to thoroughly evaluate the efficacy of RES as a therapy for retinal cell loss in glaucoma.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Seyed Arash Aghaei Meibodi and Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al‐Hawary: investigation; Jitendra Gupta, and Ibrohim B. Sapaev: resources; Mazin A. A. Najm, Marim Alwave, and Mozhgan Nazifi: data curation; Maryam Golmohammadi, Seyed Arash Aghaei Meibodi, & Mohammad Yasin Zamanian: writing—original draft preparation; Maryam Golmohammadi and Mohammad Yasin Zamanian: writing—review and editing; Gervason Moriasi: visualization; Mohammad Yasin Zamanian and Mohammadreza Rahmani: supervision; Mohammad Yasin Zamanian and Maryam Golmohammadi: project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
FUNDING INFORMATION
Not applicable.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
ETHICS STATEMENT
Not applicable.
Golmohammadi M, Meibodi SAA, Al‐Hawary SIS, et al. Neuroprotective effects of resveratrol on retinal ganglion cells in glaucoma in rodents: A narrative review. Anim Models Exp Med. 2024;7:195‐207. doi: 10.1002/ame2.12438
Contributor Information
Mohammadreza Rahmani, Email: dr.rahmani@rums.ac.ir.
Mohammad Yasin Zamanian, Email: m.zamanian@umsha.ac.ir, Email: mzamaniyan66@yahoo.com.
REFERENCES
- 1. Alkhatib AW. Glaucoma: types, risk factors, detection, and management. Sch Acad J Biosci. 2023;6:207‐211. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Vijaya L, Manish P, Ronnie G, Shantha B. Management of complications in glaucoma surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59(suppl 1):S131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Senjam SS. Glaucoma blindness—a rapidly emerging non‐communicable ocular disease in India: addressing the issue with advocacy. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(5):2200‐2206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Laroche D, Rickford K, Sinon J, Brown A, Ng C, Sakkari S. Preventing blindness from glaucoma with patient education, the NIDEK GS‐1 gonioscope, lensectomy and microinvasive glaucoma surgery. J Natl Med Assoc. 2023;115(2):175‐185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Młynarczyk M, Falkowska M, Micun Z, et al. Diet, oxidative stress, and blood serum nutrients in various types of glaucoma: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2022;14(7):1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Lee Y‐H, Kim C‐S, Hong S‐p. Rate of visual field progression in primary open‐angle glaucoma and primary angle‐closure glaucoma. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2004;18(2):106‐115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Rezaie T, Child A, Hitchings R, et al. Adult‐onset primary open‐angle glaucoma caused by mutations in optineurin. Science. 2002;295(5557):1077‐1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Janssen SF, Gorgels TG, Ramdas WD, et al. The vast complexity of primary open angle glaucoma: disease genes, risks, molecular mechanisms and pathobiology. Prog Retin Eye res. 2013;37:31‐67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sun X, Dai Y, Chen Y, et al. Primary angle closure glaucoma: what we know and what we don't know. Prog Retin Eye res. 2017;57:26‐45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Liu L, Sha X‐Y, Wu Y‐N, Chen M‐T, Zhong J‐X. Lycium barbarum polysaccharides protects retinal ganglion cells against oxidative stress injury. Neural Regen res. 2020;15(8):1526‐1531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Mead B, Tomarev S. Evaluating retinal ganglion cell loss and dysfunction. Exp Eye res. 2016;151:96‐106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Dhande OS, Huberman AD. Retinal ganglion cell maps in the brain: implications for visual processing. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014;24:133‐142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Dhande OS, Stafford BK, Lim J‐HA, Huberman AD. Contributions of retinal ganglion cells to subcortical visual processing and behaviors. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2015;1:291‐328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Chen H‐Y, Ho Y‐J, Chou H‐C, et al. TGF‐β1 signaling protects retinal ganglion cells from oxidative stress via modulation of the HO‐1/Nrf2 pathway. Chem Biol Interact. 2020;331:109249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Agarwal P, Agarwal R. Tackling retinal ganglion cell apoptosis in glaucoma: role of adenosine receptors. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2021;25(7):585‐596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zamanian M, Shamsizadeh A, Esmaeili Nadimi A, et al. Short‐term effects of troxerutin (vitamin P4) on muscle fatigue and gene expression of Bcl‐2 and Bax in the hepatic tissue of rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2017;95(6):708‐713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kumar DM, Agarwal N. Oxidative stress in glaucoma: a burden of evidence. J Glaucoma. 2007;16(3):334‐343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ye M‐j, Meng N. Resveratrol acts via the mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway to protect retinal ganglion cells from apoptosis induced by hydrogen peroxide. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):4878‐4886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Robin AL, Muir KW. Medication adherence in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2019;14(4–5):199‐210. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Friedman DS, Quigley HA, Gelb L, et al. Using pharmacy claims data to study adherence to glaucoma medications: methodology and findings of the Glaucoma Adherence and Persistency Study (GAPS). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(11):5052‐5057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wong TY, Sun J, Kawasaki R, et al. Guidelines on diabetic eye care: the international council of ophthalmology recommendations for screening, follow‐up, referral, and treatment based on resource settings. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(10):1608‐1622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Pescosolido N, Gatto V, Stefanucci A, Rusciano D. Oral treatment with the melatonin agonist agomelatine lowers the intraocular pressure of glaucoma patients. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35(2):201‐205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Koucheki B, Hashemi H. Selective laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of open‐angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(1):65‐70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Fingeret M, Dickerson JE Jr. The role of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery devices in the management of glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(2):155‐162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Garcia‐Medina JJ, Rubio‐Velazquez E, Lopez‐Bernal MD, et al. Glaucoma and antioxidants: review and update. Antioxidants. 2020;9(11):1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Dziedziak J, Kasarełło K, Cudnoch‐Jędrzejewska A. Dietary antioxidants in age‐related macular degeneration and glaucoma. Antioxidants. 2021;10(11):1743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Burugula B, Ganesh BS, Chintala SK. Curcumin attenuates staurosporine‐mediated death of retinal ganglion cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(7):4263‐4273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Li S, Jakobs TC. Vitamin C protects retinal ganglion cells via SPP1 in glaucoma and after optic nerve damage. Life Sci Alliance. 2023;6(8):e202301976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ko M‐L, Peng P‐H, Hsu S‐Y, Chen C‐F. Dietary deficiency of vitamin E aggravates retinal ganglion cell death in experimental glaucoma of rats. Curr Eye res. 2010;35(9):842‐849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Li S‐Y, Lo AC. Lutein protects RGC‐5 cells against hypoxia and oxidative stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11(5):2109‐2117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Pang Y, Qin M, Hu P, et al. Resveratrol protects retinal ganglion cells against ischemia induced damage by increasing Opa1 expression. Int J Mol Med. 2020;46(5):1707‐1720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Chupradit S, Bokov D, Zamanian MY, Heidari M, Hakimizadeh E. Hepatoprotective and therapeutic effects of resveratrol: a focus on anti‐inflammatory and antioxidative activities. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2022;36(3):468‐485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zamanian MY, Parra RMR, Soltani A, et al. Targeting Nrf2 signaling pathway and oxidative stress by resveratrol for Parkinson's disease: an overview and update on new developments. Mol Biol Rep. 2023;1‐10:5455‐5464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wu Y, Pang Y, Wei W, et al. Resveratrol protects retinal ganglion cell axons through regulation of the SIRT1‐JNK pathway. Exp Eye res. 2020;200:108249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Seong H, Jeong JY, Ryu J, et al. Resveratrol prevents hypoxia‐induced retinal ganglion cell death related with ErbB2. Int J Ophthalmol. 2022;15(3):394‐400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Tan M, Yu D. Molecular mechanisms of erbB2‐mediated breast cancer chemoresistance. Breast Cancer Chemosensitivity; 2007:119‐129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Pezzuto JM. Resveratrol: twenty years of growth, development and controversy. Biomol Ther. 2019;27(1):1‐14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kobylka P, Kucinska M, Kujawski J, Lazewski D, Wierzchowski M, Murias M. Resveratrol analogues as selective estrogen signaling pathway modulators: structure—activity relationship. Molecules. 2022;27(20):6973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Chan EWC, Wong CW, Tan YH, Foo JPY, Wong SK, Chan HT. Resveratrol and pterostilbene: a comparative overview of their chemistry, biosynthesis, plant sources and pharmacological properties. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2019;9(7):124‐129. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Mlakić M, Fodor L, Odak I, et al. Resveratrol–maltol and resveratrol–thiophene hybrids as cholinesterase inhibitors and antioxidants: synthesis, biometal chelating capability and crystal structure. Molecules. 2022;27(19):6379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Wang F, Chatterjee S. Dominant carbons in trans‐and cis‐resveratrol isomerization. J Phys Chem B. 2017;121(18):4745‐4755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Loureiro JA, Andrade S, Duarte A, et al. Resveratrol and grape extract‐loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Molecules. 2017;22(2):277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Hasan MM, Bae H. An overview of stress‐induced resveratrol synthesis in grapes: perspectives for resveratrol‐enriched grape products. Molecules. 2017;22(2):294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Bavaresco L, Mattivi F, De Rosso M, Flamini R. Effects of elicitors, viticultural factors, and enological practices on resveratrol and stilbenes in grapevine and wine. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2012;12(13):1366‐1381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Rudolf J, Resurreccion A. Optimization of trans‐resveratrol concentration and sensory properties of peanut kernels by slicing and ultrasound treatment, using response surface methodology. J Food Sci. 2007;72(7):S450‐S462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Toniolo L, Concato M, Giacomello E. Resveratrol, a multitasking molecule that improves skeletal muscle health. Nutrients. 2023;15(15):3413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Sergides C, Chirilă M, Silvestro L, Pitta D, Pittas A. Bioavailability and safety study of resveratrol 500 mg tablets in healthy male and female volunteers. Exp Ther Med. 2016;11(1):164‐170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Jannin B, Menzel M, Berlot J‐P, Delmas D, Lançon A, Latruffe N. Transport of resveratrol, a cancer chemopreventive agent, to cellular targets: plasmatic protein binding and cell uptake. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;68(6):1113‐1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Davidov‐Pardo G, McClements DJ. Resveratrol encapsulation: designing delivery systems to overcome solubility, stability and bioavailability issues. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2014;38(2):88‐103. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Wenzel E, Soldo T, Erbersdobler H, Somoza V. Bioactivity and metabolism of trans‐resveratrol orally administered to Wistar rats. Mol Nutr Food res. 2005;49(5):482‐494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Wang P, Gao J, Ke W, et al. Resveratrol reduces obesity in high‐fat diet‐fed mice via modulating the composition and metabolic function of the gut microbiota. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;156:83‐98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Henry C, Vitrac X, Decendit A, Ennamany R, Krisa S, Mérillon J‐M. Cellular uptake and efflux of trans‐piceid and its aglycone trans‐resveratrol on the apical membrane of human intestinal Caco‐2 cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(3):798‐803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Truong VL, Jun M, Jeong WS. Role of resveratrol in regulation of cellular defense systems against oxidative stress. Biofactors. 2018;44(1):36‐49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Briskey D, Rao A. Trans‐resveratrol oral bioavailability in humans using LipiSperse™ dispersion technology. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(12):1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Shi Y, Zhou J, Jiang B, Miao M. Resveratrol and inflammatory bowel disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017;1403(1):38‐47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Decui L, Garbinato CLL, Schneider SE, et al. Micronized resveratrol shows promising effects in a seizure model in zebrafish and signalizes an important advance in epilepsy treatment. Epilepsy res. 2020;159:106243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Lasa A, Churruca I, Eseberri I, Andrés‐Lacueva C, Portillo MP. Delipidating effect of resveratrol metabolites in 3 T 3‐L 1 adipocytes. Mol Nutr Food res. 2012;56(10):1559‐1568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Wenzel E, Somoza V. Metabolism and bioavailability of trans‐resveratrol. Mol Nutr Food res. 2005;49(5):472‐481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Andres‐Lacueva C, Urpi‐Sarda M, Zamora‐Ros R, Lamuela‐Raventos RM. Bioavailability and metabolism of resveratrol. Plant Phenolics and Human Health: Biochemistry, Nutrition, and Pharmacology; 2009:265‐297. [Google Scholar]
- 60. Frombaum M, Le Clanche S, Bonnefont‐Rousselot D, Borderie D. Antioxidant effects of resveratrol and other stilbene derivatives on oxidative stress and NO bioavailability: potential benefits to cardiovascular diseases. Biochimie. 2012;94(2):269‐276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Zhang L, Li Y, Gu Z, et al. Resveratrol inhibits enterovirus 71 replication and pro‐inflammatory cytokine secretion in rhabdosarcoma cells through blocking IKKs/NF‐κB signaling pathway. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0116879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Lagouge M, Argmann C, Gerhart‐Hines Z, et al. Resveratrol improves mitochondrial function and protects against metabolic disease by activating SIRT1 and PGC‐1α. Cell. 2006;127(6):1109‐1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Sung MM, Byrne NJ, Robertson IM, et al. Resveratrol improves exercise performance and skeletal muscle oxidative capacity in heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2017;312(4):H842‐H853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Dos Santos MG, Schimith LE, André‐Miral C, Muccillo‐Baisch AL, Arbo BD, Hort MA. Neuroprotective effects of resveratrol in in vivo and in vitro experimental models of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Neurotox res. 2022;1‐27:319‐345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Thakkar S, Anklam E, Xu A, et al. Regulatory landscape of dietary supplements and herbal medicines from a global perspective. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020;114:104647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Timmers S, Hesselink MK, Schrauwen P. Therapeutic potential of resveratrol in obesity and type 2 diabetes: new avenues for health benefits? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1290(1):83‐89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Smoliga JM, Baur JA, Hausenblas HA. Resveratrol and health—a comprehensive review of human clinical trials. Mol Nutr Food res. 2011;55(8):1129‐1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Espinoza JL, Trung LQ, Inaoka PT, et al. The repeated administration of resveratrol has measurable effects on circulating T‐cell subsets in humans. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:6781872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Cottart CH, Nivet‐Antoine V, Beaudeux JL. Review of recent data on the metabolism, biological effects, and toxicity of resveratrol in humans. Mol Nutr Food res. 2014;58(1):7‐21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Salehi B, Mishra AP, Nigam M, et al. Resveratrol: a double‐edged sword in health benefits. Biomedicine. 2018;6(3):91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Shaito A, Posadino AM, Younes N, et al. Potential adverse effects of resveratrol: a literature review. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(6):2084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Quarta A, Gaballo A, Pradhan B, Patra S, Jena M, Ragusa A. Beneficial oxidative stress‐related trans‐resveratrol effects in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Appl Sci. 2021;11(22):11041. [Google Scholar]
- 73. Rafati A, Hoseini L, Babai A, Noorafshan A, Haghbin H, Karbalay‐Doust S. Mitigating effect of resveratrol on the structural changes of mice liver and kidney induced by cadmium; a stereological study. Prev Nutr Food Sci. 2015;20(4):266‐275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Gadacha W, Ben‐Attia M, Bonnefont‐Rousselot D, Aouani E, Ghanem‐Boughanmi N, Touitou Y. Resveratrol opposite effects on rat tissue lipoperoxidation: pro‐oxidant during day‐time and antioxidant at night. Redox Rep. 2009;14(4):154‐158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Gazzard G, Konstantakopoulou E, Garway‐Heath D, et al. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first‐line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10180):1505‐1516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Anderson DR, Drance SM, Schulzer M. Factors that predict the benefit of lowering intraocular pressure in normal tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(5):820‐829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Marquis RE, Whitson JT. Management of glaucoma: focus on pharmacological therapy. Drugs Aging. 2005;22:1‐21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Llobet A, Gasull X, Gual A. Understanding trabecular meshwork physiology: a key to the control of intraocular pressure? Phys Ther. 2003;18(5):205‐209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Kurysheva NI, Lepeshkina LV. Selective laser trabeculoplasty protects glaucoma progression in the initial primary open‐angle glaucoma and angle‐closure glaucoma after laser peripheral iridotomy in the long term. Biomed res Int. 2019;2019:1‐10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Melamed S, Pei J, Epstein DL. Delayed response to argon laser trabeculoplasty in monkeys: morphological and morphometric analysis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104(7):1078‐1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Cai J‐C, Chen Y‐L, Cao Y‐H, Babenko A, Chen X. Numerical study of aqueous humor flow and iris deformation with pupillary block and the efficacy of laser peripheral iridotomy. Clin Biomech. 2022;92:105579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Razeghinejad MR, Spaeth GL. A history of the surgical management of glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(1):E39‐E47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Panarelli JF, Nayak NV, Sidoti PA. Postoperative management of trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage implant surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016;27(2):170‐176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Pillunat LE, Erb C, Jünemann AG, Kimmich F. Micro‐invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS): a review of surgical procedures using stents. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1583‐1600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Pereira IC, van de Wijdeven R, Wyss HM, Beckers HJ, den Toonder JM. Conventional glaucoma implants and the new MIGS devices: a comprehensive review of current options and future directions. Eye. 2021;35(12):3202‐3221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Fan Gaskin JC, Shah MH, Chan EC. Oxidative stress and the role of NADPH oxidase in glaucoma. Antioxidants. 2021;10(2):238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Duarte JN. Neuroinflammatory mechanisms of mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration in glaucoma. J Ophthalmol. 2021;2021:4581909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Hurley DJ, Normile C, Irnaten M, O'Brien C. The intertwined roles of oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress in glaucoma. Antioxidants. 2022;11(5):886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Harada C, Noro T, Kimura A, et al. Suppression of oxidative stress as potential therapeutic approach for normal tension glaucoma. Antioxidants. 2020;9(9):874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Doucette LP, Rasnitsyn A, Seifi M, Walter MA. The interactions of genes, age, and environment in glaucoma pathogenesis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2015;60(4):310‐326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Kuang G, Halimitabrizi M, Edziah A‐A, Salowe R, O'Brien JM. The potential for mitochondrial therapeutics in the treatment of primary open‐angle glaucoma: a review. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1184060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Chrysostomou V, Rezania F, Trounce IA, Crowston JG. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in glaucoma. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2013;13(1):12‐15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Brown EE, DeWeerd AJ, Ildefonso CJ, Lewin AS, Ash JD. Mitochondrial oxidative stress in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) led to metabolic dysfunction in both the RPE and retinal photoreceptors. Redox Biol. 2019;24:101201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Chen K, Zhang Q, Wang J, et al. Taurine protects transformed rat retinal ganglion cells from hypoxia‐induced apoptosis by preventing mitochondrial dysfunction. Brain res. 2009;1279:131‐138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Huang C, Xie L, Wu Z, et al. Detection of mutations in MYOC, OPTN, NTF4, WDR36 and CYP1B1 in Chinese juvenile onset open‐angle glaucoma using exome sequencing. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Kumar A, Basavaraj MG, Gupta SK, et al. Role of CYP1B1, MYOC, OPTN and OPTC genes in adult‐onset primary open‐angle glaucoma: predominance of CYP1B1 mutations in Indian patients. Mol Vis. 2007;13:667‐676. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Hirooka K, Yamamoto T, Kiuchi Y. Dysfunction of axonal transport in normal‐tension glaucoma: a biomarker of disease progression and a potential therapeutic target. Neural Regen res. 2021;16(3):506‐507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Hartsock MJ, Cho H, Wu L, Chen W‐J, Gong J, Duh EJ. A mouse model of retinal ischemia‐reperfusion injury through elevation of intraocular pressure. J Vis Exp. 2016;113:e54065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Ji K, Li Z, Lei Y, et al. Resveratrol attenuates retinal ganglion cell loss in a mouse model of retinal ischemia reperfusion injury via multiple pathways. Exp Eye res. 2021;209:108683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Luo J, He T, Yang J, Yang N, Li Z, Xing Y. SIRT1 is required for the neuroprotection of resveratrol on retinal ganglion cells after retinal ischemia‐reperfusion injury in mice. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258:335‐344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Wang N, Cao Y, Si C, et al. Emerging role of ERBB2 in targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: signaling pathways to therapeutic strategies. Cancer. 2022;14(20):5160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Andrechek ER, Hardy WR, Girgis‐Gabardo AA, et al. ErbB2 is required for muscle spindle and myoblast cell survival. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22(13):4714‐4722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Marchionni MA, Goodearl AD, Su Chen M, et al. Glial growth factors are alternatively spliced erbB2 ligands expressed in the nervous system. Nature. 1993;362(6418):312‐318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Garratt AN, Özcelik C, Birchmeier C. ErbB2 pathways in heart and neural diseases. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2003;13(2):80‐86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Jackson‐Fisher AJ, Bellinger G, Ramabhadran R, Morris JK, Lee K‐F, Stern DF. ErbB2 is required for ductal morphogenesis of the mammary gland. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(49):17138‐17143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Araya LE, Soni IV, Hardy JA, Julien O. Deorphanizing caspase‐3 and caspase‐9 substrates in and out of apoptosis with deep substrate profiling. ACS Chem Biol. 2021;16(11):2280‐2296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Robinson N, Ganesan R, Hegedűs C, Kovács K, Kufer TA, Virág L. Programmed necrotic cell death of macrophages: focus on pyroptosis, necroptosis, and parthanatos. Redox Biol. 2019;26:101239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Asadi M, Taghizadeh S, Kaviani E, et al. Caspase‐3: structure, function, and biotechnological aspects. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2022;69(4):1633‐1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Zhao X, Bausano B, Pike BR, et al. TNF‐α stimulates caspase‐3 activation and apoptotic cell death in primary septo‐hippocampal cultures. J Neurosci res. 2001;64(2):121‐131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Nakanishi K, Maruyama M, Shibata T, Morishima N. Identification of a caspase‐9 substrate and detection of its cleavage in programmed cell death during mouse development. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(44):41237‐41244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Tripathi SK, Rengasamy KR, Biswal BK. Plumbagin engenders apoptosis in lung cancer cells via caspase‐9 activation and targeting mitochondrial‐mediated ROS induction. Arch Pharm res. 2020;43:242‐256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Li P, Zhou L, Zhao T, et al. Caspase‐9: structure, mechanisms and clinical application. Oncotarget. 2017;8(14):23996‐24008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Zhang T‐M. TRIAP1 inhibition activates the cytochrome c/Apaf‐1/caspase‐9 signaling pathway to enhance human ovarian cancer sensitivity to cisplatin. Chemotherapy. 2019;64(3):119‐128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Park H‐B, Baek K‐H. E3 ligases and deubiquitinating enzymes regulating the MAPK signaling pathway in cancers. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2022;1877(3):188736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Katz M, Amit I, Yarden Y. Regulation of MAPKs by growth factors and receptor tyrosine kinases. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2007;1773(8):1161‐1176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Clerk A, Kemp TJ, Harrison JG, Mullen AJ, Barton PJ, Sugden PH. Up‐regulation of c‐jun mRNA in cardiac myocytes requires the extracellular signal‐regulated kinase cascade, but c‐Jun N‐terminal kinases are required for efficient up‐regulation of c‐Jun protein. Biochem J. 2002;368(1):101‐110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Rorbach‐Dolata A , Piwowar A . Extracellular signal‐regulated kinases, P38 and c‐Jun N‐terminal kinases phosphorylation changes in PC12 cells with diabetic disturbances and comorbid excitotoxicity—a preliminary report . J Physiol Pharmacol . 2020. ; 71 ( 5 ): 625‐633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Yuan J, Dong X, Yap J, Hu J. The MAPK and AMPK signalings: interplay and implication in targeted cancer therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):1‐19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Lavoie H, Gagnon J, Therrien M. ERK signalling: a master regulator of cell behaviour, life and fate. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(10):607‐632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Florio T, Yao H, Carey KD, Dillon TJ, Stork PJ. Somatostatin activation of mitogen‐activated protein kinase via somatostatin receptor 1 (SSTR1). Mol Endocrinol. 1999;13(1):24‐37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Stork PJ, Schmitt JM. Crosstalk between cAMP and MAP kinase signaling in the regulation of cell proliferation. Trends Cell Biol. 2002;12(6):258‐266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Tarantino G, Caputi A. JNKs, insulin resistance and inflammation: a possible link between NAFLD and coronary artery disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(33):3785‐3794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Bogoyevitch MA. The isoform‐specific functions of the c‐Jun N‐terminal kinases (JNKs): differences revealed by gene targeting. Bioessays. 2006;28(9):923‐934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Park C‐H, Lee MJ, Ahn J, et al. Heat shock‐induced matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)‐1 and MMP‐3 are mediated through ERK and JNK activation and via an autocrine interleukin‐6 loop. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;123(6):1012‐1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Nebreda AR, Porras A. p38 MAP kinases: beyond the stress response. Trends Biochem Sci. 2000;25(6):257‐260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Yong H‐Y, Koh M‐S, Moon A. The p38 MAPK inhibitors for the treatment of inflammatory diseases and cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009;18(12):1893‐1905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Cuenda A, Rousseau S. p38 MAP‐kinases pathway regulation, function and role in human diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2007;1773(8):1358‐1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Lim CS, Kiriakidis S, Sandison A, Paleolog EM, Davies AH. Hypoxia‐inducible factor pathway and diseases of the vascular wall. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(1):219‐230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Wan L, Huang J, Chen J, et al. Expression and significance of FOXP1, HIF‐1a and VEGF in renal clear cell carcinoma. J BUON. 2015;20(1):188‐195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Firdaus R, Prijanti AR. Control of HIF‐1α levels potentially promotes the tissue repair in various conditions through target gene expression. BioSci Med J Biomed Transl Res. 2022;6(1):1266‐1274. [Google Scholar]
- 131. Minet E, Michel G, Remacle J, Michiels C. Role of HIF‐1 as a transcription factor involved in embryonic development, cancer progression and apoptosis. Int J Mol Med. 2000;5(3):253‐262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Elebiyo TC, Rotimi D, Evbuomwan IO, et al. Reassessing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in anti‐angiogenic cancer therapy. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2022;32:100620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Schrijvers BF, Flyvbjerg A, De Vriese AS. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in renal pathophysiology. Kidney Int. 2004;65(6):2003‐2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Velazquez OC. Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis: inducing the growth of new blood vessels and wound healing by stimulation of bone marrow–derived progenitor cell mobilization and homing. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(6):A39‐A47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Bai Y, Jx M, Guo J, et al. Müller cell‐derived VEGF is a significant contributor to retinal neovascularization. J Pathol. 2009;219(4):446‐454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Yang Y, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. Regulation of SIRT1 and its roles in inflammation. Front Immunol. 2022;13:831168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Kim E‐J, Um S‐J. SIRT1: roles in aging and cancer. BMB Rep. 2008;41(11):751‐756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Yu A, Dang W. Regulation of stem cell aging by SIRT1—linking metabolic signaling to epigenetic modifications. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017;455:75‐82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Albani D, Polito L, Batelli S, et al. The SIRT1 activator resveratrol protects SK‐N‐BE cells from oxidative stress and against toxicity caused by α‐synuclein or amyloid‐β (1‐42) peptide. J Neurochem. 2009;110(5):1445‐1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Pallàs M, Casadesús G, Smith MA, et al. Resveratrol and neurodegenerative diseases: activation of SIRT1 as the potential pathway towards neuroprotection. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2009;6(1):70‐81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Antonsson B. Bax and other pro‐apoptotic Bcl‐2 family “killer‐proteins” and their victim the mitochondrion. Cell Tissue res. 2001;306:347‐361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Sitarek P, Skała E, Toma M, et al. A preliminary study of apoptosis induction in glioma cells via alteration of the Bax/Bcl‐2‐p53 axis by transformed and non‐transformed root extracts of Leonurus sibiricus L. Tumor Biol. 2016;37:8753‐8764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Maes ME, Schlamp CL, Nickells RW. BAX to basics: how the BCL2 gene family controls the death of retinal ganglion cells. Prog Retin Eye res. 2017;57:1‐25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Manning BD, Toker A. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating the network. Cell. 2017;169(3):381‐405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Gan Y, Shi C, Inge L, Hibner M, Balducci J, Huang Y. Differential roles of ERK and Akt pathways in regulation of EGFR‐mediated signaling and motility in prostate cancer cells. Oncogene. 2010;29(35):4947‐4958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Abeyrathna P, Su Y. The critical role of Akt in cardiovascular function. Vascul Pharmacol. 2015;74:38‐48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Hopkins N, Goldsmith ZK, Jablonski MM, Wilson MW, Seigel GM, Morales VM. In search for the RGC lineage: characterization of R28 cells and the expression of RGC markers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(9):4861. [Google Scholar]
- 148. Wang C, An Y, Xia Z, et al. The neuroprotective effect of melatonin in glutamate excitotoxicity of R28 cells and mouse retinal ganglion cells. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:986131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Frezza C, Cipolat S, De Brito OM, et al. OPA1 controls apoptotic cristae remodeling independently from mitochondrial fusion. Cell. 2006;126(1):177‐189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Palmer CS, Osellame LD, Stojanovski D, Ryan MT. The regulation of mitochondrial morphology: intricate mechanisms and dynamic machinery. Cell Signal. 2011;23(10):1534‐1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Quintana‐Cabrera R, Quirin C, Glytsou C, et al. The cristae modulator optic atrophy 1 requires mitochondrial ATP synthase oligomers to safeguard mitochondrial function. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Broxton CN, Culotta VC. SOD enzymes and microbial pathogens: surviving the oxidative storm of infection. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(1):e1005295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Spirina LV, Yunusova NV, Kondakova IV, Tarasenko NV. Transcription factors Brn‐3α and TRIM16 in cancers, association with hormone reception. Heliyon. 2019;5(8):e02090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Nadal‐Nicolás FM, Jiménez‐López M, Sobrado‐Calvo P, et al. Brn3a as a marker of retinal ganglion cells: qualitative and quantitative time course studies in naive and optic nerve–injured retinas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(8):3860‐3868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Kogan CS, Zangenehpour S, Chaudhuri A. Developmental profiles of SMI‐32 immunoreactivity in monkey striate cortex. Dev Brain Res. 2000;119(1):85‐95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Tan H, Li X, Huang K, Luo M, Wang L. Morphological and distributional properties of SMI‐32 immunoreactive ganglion cells in the rat retina. J Comp Neurol. 2022;530(8):1276‐1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Seifer DB, Lambert‐Messerlian G, Schneyer AL. Ovarian brain‐derived neurotrophic factor is present in follicular fluid from normally cycling women. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(2):451‐452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Balaratnasingam S, Janca A. Brain derived neurotrophic factor: a novel neurotrophin involved in psychiatric and neurological disorders. Pharmacol Ther. 2012;134(1):116‐124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Zhang F, Kang Z, Li W, Xiao Z, Zhou X. Roles of brain‐derived neurotrophic factor/tropomyosin‐related kinase B (BDNF/TrkB) signalling in Alzheimer's disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19(7):946‐949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Hannan MA, Dash R, Sohag AAM, Haque MN, Moon IS. Neuroprotection against oxidative stress: phytochemicals targeting TrkB signaling and the Nrf2‐ARE antioxidant system. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020;13:116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Cao K, Ishida T, Fang Y, et al. Protection of the retinal ganglion cells: intravitreal injection of resveratrol in mouse model of ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(3):13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Baudouin C, Kolko M, Melik‐Parsadaniantz S, Messmer EM. Inflammation in glaucoma: from the back to the front of the eye, and beyond. Prog Retin Eye res. 2021;83:100916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Vohra R, Tsai JC, Kolko M. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013;58(4):311‐320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Wei X, Cho KS, Thee EF, Jager MJ, Chen DF. Neuroinflammation and microglia in glaucoma: time for a paradigm shift. J Neurosci res. 2019;97(1):70‐76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Malvitte L, Montange T, Vejux A, et al. Measurement of inflammatory cytokines by multicytokine assay in tears of patients with glaucoma topically treated with chronic drugs. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(1):29‐32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Adornetto A, Russo R, Parisi V. Neuroinflammation as a target for glaucoma therapy. Neural Regen res. 2019;14(3):391‐394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Morgan MJ, Liu Z‐g. Crosstalk of reactive oxygen species and NF‐κB signaling. Cell res. 2011;21(1):103‐115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Mahaling B, Low SW, Beck M, et al. Damage‐associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in retinal disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(5):2591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Schmidt RL, Lenz LL. Distinct licensing of IL‐18 and IL‐1β secretion in response to NLRP3 inflammasome activation. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(9):e45186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Shinozaki Y, Koizumi S. Potential roles of astrocytes and Müller cells in the pathogenesis of glaucoma. J Pharmacol Sci. 2021;145(3):262‐267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Inman DM, Horner PJ. Reactive nonproliferative gliosis predominates in a chronic mouse model of glaucoma. Glia. 2007;55(9):942‐953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Mehta A, Prabhakar M, Kumar P, Deshmukh R, Sharma P. Excitotoxicity: bridge to various triggers in neurodegenerative disorders. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013;698(1–3):6‐18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Casson RJ. Possible role of excitotoxicity in the pathogenesis of glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34(1):54‐63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Luo H, Zhuang J, Hu P, et al. Resveratrol delays retinal ganglion cell loss and attenuates gliosis‐related inflammation from ischemia‐reperfusion injury. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(10):3879‐3888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Naidoo N. Cellular stress/the unfolded protein response: relevance to sleep and sleep disorders. Sleep Med Rev. 2009;13(3):195‐204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Arensdorf AM, Diedrichs D, Rutkowski DT. Regulation of the transcriptome by ER stress: non‐canonical mechanisms and physiological consequences. Front Genet. 2013;4:256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Direito I, Gomes D, Monteiro FL, et al. The clinicopathological significance of BiP/GRP‐78 in breast cancer: a meta‐analysis of public datasets and immunohistochemical detection. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(12):9066‐9087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Shima K, Klinger M, Schütze S, et al. The role of endoplasmic reticulum‐related BiP/GRP 78 in interferon gamma‐induced persistent C hlamydia pneumoniae infection. Cell Microbiol. 2015;17(7):923‐934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Hu Y, Park KK, Yang L, et al. Differential effects of unfolded protein response pathways on axon injury‐induced death of retinal ganglion cells. Neuron. 2012;73(3):445‐452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Vannuvel K, Renard P, Raes M, Arnould T. Functional and morphological impact of ER stress on mitochondria. J Cell Physiol. 2013;228(9):1802‐1818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Xu W, Wang C, Hua J. X‐box binding protein 1 (XBP1) function in diseases. Cell Biol Int. 2021;45(4):731‐739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Lindsey JD, Duong‐Polk KX, Hammond D, Leung CK‐s, Weinreb RN. Protection of injured retinal ganglion cell dendrites and unfolded protein response resolution after long‐term dietary resveratrol. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36(5):1969‐1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Bai Y, Xu J, Brahimi F, Zhuo Y, Sarunic MV, Saragovi HU. An agonistic TrkB mAb causes sustained TrkB activation, delays RGC death, and protects the retinal structure in optic nerve axotomy and in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(9):4722‐4731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. King CE, Rodger J, Bartlett C, Esmaili T, Dunlop SA, Beazley LD. Erythropoietin is both neuroprotective and neuroregenerative following optic nerve transection. Exp Neurol. 2007;205(1):48‐55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185. Kim SH, Park JH, Kim YJ, Park KH. The neuroprotective effect of resveratrol on retinal ganglion cells after optic nerve transection. Mol Vis. 2013;19:1667‐1676. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186. Khan AJ, LaCava S, Mehta M, et al. The glutamate release inhibitor riluzole increases DNA damage and enhances cytotoxicity in human glioma cells, in vitro and in vivo. Oncotarget. 2019;10(29):2824‐2834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187. Hascup KN, Findley CA, Britz J, et al. Riluzole attenuates glutamatergic tone and cognitive decline in AβPP/PS1 mice. J Neurochem. 2021;156(4):513‐523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Pirhan D, Yüksel N, Emre E, Cengiz A, Kürşat YD. Riluzole‐and resveratrol‐induced delay of retinal ganglion cell death in an experimental model of glaucoma. Curr Eye res. 2016;41(1):59‐69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
