Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 7;14(7):e11640. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11640

TABLE 1.

Maximum LOD scores for all 29 traits measured in Little Lake and Crescent Pond mapping crosses.

Trait Population Scaffold Max LOD Genome‐wide significance n PVE x2 p‐value
Lower Jaw Length Crescent Pond 53, 7087, 2336, 6275, 26, 7335 2.89 205 6.29 .0013
Little Lake 24, 4028, 58, 16 3.30 228 6.45 .0005
Jaw closing In‐Lever Crescent Pond 31, 4, 451, 19 3.60 204 7.81 .0002
Little Lake 8, 9588, 8020 4.11 · 227 7.99 .0001
Jaw Opening In‐Lever Crescent Pond 6086, 11 2.43 205 5.32 .0037
Little Lake 43 2.98 227 5.87 .0010
Palatine Height Crescent Pond 34, 22, 6304 2.90 205 6.31 .0013
Little Lake 11 2.73 228 5.36 .0019
Suspensorium Length Crescent Pond 46, 37, 31, 26, 60, 7556, 10,198, 22 3.54 204 7.68 .0003
Little Lake 11 3.51 227 6.88 .0003
Dentigerous Arm Width Crescent Pond 52, 13,137, 40 2.19 202 4.87 .0065
Little Lake 24, 4028, 58, 16 4.05 ·* 228 7.85 .0001
Maxilla Length Crescent Pond 27, 593, 4, 31, 451, 19 2.67 204 5.85 .0021
Little Lake 56 3.03 228 5.94 .0009
Dentigerous Arm Base Crescent Pond 27, 593, 4, 31, 451, 19 2.98 205 6.47 .0011
Little Lake 26 3.70 228 7.21 .0002
Dentigerous Arm Depth Crescent Pond 6086, 11, 46 4.20 ·* 205 9.00 .0001
Little Lake 5 3.70 · 217 7.55 .0002
Ascending Process Length Crescent Pond 27, 593, 4, 31, 451, 19 2.70 201 6.00 .0020
Little Lake 46, 37 3.70 210 7.79 .0002
Maxillary Head Height Crescent Pond 6086, 11, 46 2.33 205 5.11 .0046
Little Lake 7, 30 2.19 228 4.33 .0064
Ectopterygoid Crescent Pond 14, 9, 16, 5405, 11,419 2.81 205 6.11 .0016
Little Lake 9 3.36 228 6.56 .0004
Maxillary Head Protrusion Crescent Pond 58, 24, 41, 47 2.70 205 5.88 .0020
Little Lake 7431, 53, 6275, 2336, 25 4.03 · * 228 7.82 .0001
Nasal Tissue Protrusion Crescent Pond 46, 37, 31, 26, 60, 7556, 10,198, 22 2.25 205 4.93 .0056
Little Lake 9 3.69 228 7.18 .0002
Orbit Diameter Crescent Pond 9588, 8, 8020 2.34 205 5.13 .0045
Little Lake 52, 40, 41 2.58 227 5.10 .0026
Cranial Height Crescent Pond 33, 39 3.59 · 205 7.74 .0003
Little Lake 33 3.94 · 224 7.78 .0001
Head Depth Crescent Pond 16, 40 2.98 204 6.51 .0010
Little Lake 52, 40, 41 2.71 223 5.45 .0019
Pelvic Girdle Length Crescent Pond 31, 18, 15, 11,057, 55, 52 2.68 203 5.90 .0021
Little Lake 27, 37, 7 2.87 226 5.68 .0014
Premaxilla Pelvic Girdle Crescent Pond 37, 46, 7556, 10,198 3.15 202 6.92 .0007
Little Lake 35, 38, 20, 8508, 10,278, 33 2.63 231 5.10 .0024
Standard Length (mm) Crescent Pond 14, 9, 16, 5405, 11,419 2.90 204 6.34 .0013
Little Lake 31, 46, 37 3.48 231 6.69 .0003
Cranium Dorsal Fin Crescent Pond 6704, 52, 13,137, 40 2.84 205 6.18 .0014
Little Lake 37, 22, 7556 3.45 231 6.65 .0004
Dorsal Fin Width Crescent Pond 43, 26, 14,743 2.18 205 4.78 .0066
Little Lake 842, 44, 1074, 6, 30 3.00 230 5.83 .0010
Dorsal Fin Height Crescent Pond 18, 31, 15, 11,057, 55 2.84 203 6.23 .0015
Little Lake 43 3.50 222 7.00 .0003
Anterior Body Depth Crescent Pond 8, 8020 2.94 204 6.43 .0011
Little Lake 6094, 5, 4 3.33 230 6.45 .0005
Posterior Body Depth Crescent Pond 20, 471, 39, 8508, 33 2.86 203 6.27 .0014
Little Lake 18, 15 3.02 228 5.92 .0009
Caudal Peduncle Length Crescent Pond 31, 18, 15, 11,057, 55, 52 2.87 203 6.30 .0014
Little Lake 24, 4028, 58, 16 2.16 230 4.23 .0070
Anal Fin Width Crescent Pond 18, 15, 11,057, 55 2.89 201 6.41 .0013
Little Lake 6, 842, 44, 1074, 30 2.40 229 4.71 .0040
Anal Fin Height Crescent Pond 43, 26, 14,743 2.93 201 6.48 .0012
Little Lake 8, 9588, 8020 3.15 229 6.14 .0007
Caudal Peduncle Height Crescent Pond 53, 7087, 2336, 6275, 26, 7335 1.97 205 4.32 .0108
Little Lake 47, 1962 3.32 230 6.44 .0005
Adductor Crescent Pond 6086, 11 3.56 · 170 9.18 .0003
Little Lake
Proportion Time Spent Near Scale‐Eater Mates Crescent Pond 58, 24, 41, 47 2.05 74 12.00 .0089
Little Lake

Note: A genome scan with a single‐QTL model by Haley–Knott regression was used to identify the position with the highest LOD score, 95% Bayesian credible intervals, and the genome‐wide significance level for each trait (p < .1: ·; p < .05: *). We also report the scaffold numbers of genomic regions that fell within the 95% credible intervals associated with the maximum LOD position for each trait, the number of individuals phenotyped, percent variance explained (PVE) by the max LOD region, and the uncorrected p‐value associated with each max LOD region.