Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 14;16(6):3753–3763. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-179

Table 4. Hemostatic Likert score assessment of SDR firings on pulmonary arteries and pulmonary veins.

Assessment and hemostatic score SDR firings on arteries (n=145) SDR firings on veins (n=157) Total SDR firings (n=302)
Acceptable 143 (98.6) 156 (99.4) 299 (99.0)
   1. No bleeding at tissue site after initial blotting of staple-line 127 (88.8) 148 (94.9) 275 (92.0)
   2. Blood oozing at tissue site; stops prior to 15 seconds; no intervention needed 4 (2.8) 0 (0.0) 4 (1.3)
   3. Blood oozing, still progressive after 15 sec., no intervention needed 4 (2.8) 0 (0.0) 4 (1.3)
   With Likert scores (1–3) 135 (94.4) 148 (94.9) 283 (94.6)
   Likert scores not recorded 8 (5.6) 8 (5.1) 16 (5.4)
Not acceptable 2 (1.4) 1 (0.6) 3 (1.0)
   4. Blood oozing at tissue site, mild intervention (i.e., cautery) 2 (100.0) 1 (100.0) 3 (100.0)
   5. Significant bleeding requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or ligation with clips 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
   With Likert scores [4, 5] 2 (100.0) 1 (100.0) 3 (100.0)
   Likert scores not recorded 0 0 0

Data are presented as n (%). , there were sixteen firings that did not require hemostatic intervention based on surgeon review of their operative notes, however a Likert scale score was not assigned to these firings by the surgeons. For this reason, all sixteen firings are grouped with scores 1–3 and considered acceptable staple-lines not requiring intervention. SDR, Signia™ Small Diameter Reloads.