Table 3.
Results of Aim 1 Mixed Effect ANCOVA Model Examining Effect of Emotion on Emotion Recognition
| Predictor |
Percent correct response
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| df | SS | F | p | |
| Emotion | 4 | .14 | 45.44 | <.001*** |
| Child age | 1 | .07 | 11.63 | <.001*** |
| Child sex | 1 | .01 | 2.17 | .10 |
| Site | 1 | .07 | 11.35 | <.001*** |
| Residuals | 207 | 1.33 | ||
| Contrast | Estimate | SE | Adjusted p | |
|
| ||||
| Happy vs. Sad | .078 | .02 | <.001*** | |
| Happy vs. Fearful | .028 | .02 | .47 | |
| Happy vs. Angry | .037 | .02 | .21 | |
| Happy vs. Neutral | .048 | .02 | .05 | |
| Sad vs. Fearful | −.050 | .02 | .03* | |
| Sad vs. Angry | −.041 | .02 | .11 | |
| Sad vs. Neutral | −.031 | .02 | .38 | |
| Fearful vs. Angry | .008 | .02 | .98 | |
| Fearful vs. Neutral | .019 | .02 | .80 | |
| Angry vs. Neutral | .011 | .02 | .97 | |
Note. Emotion recognition differs depending on the emotion shown. Recognition was higher for happy and fearful expressions than sad.
*
p <.05,
**
p < .01,
***
p < .001