Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 8;25(4):bbae321. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae321

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparing DrugMetric Performance with QED across Datasets. (A,B) Shows the scores of DrugMetric and QED on the CD dataset, where DrugMetric (67.15) significantly outperforms QED (51.27). (C) Demonstrates the performance on a broad dataset of 195 anticancer drugs, with DrugMetric scoring an average of 70.01, significantly higher than QED’s 43.04. (D,E) Depicts their performance on MoleculeNet’s Inline graphic molecular property prediction datasets, where DrugMetric exhibits superior accuracy and versatility, while QED demonstrates relatively weaker performance. These results underscore the potential and value of DrugMetric in practical applications.