Table 3.
Authors & year of publication | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Total score | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||
a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
Chaturvedi & 1995 | * | * | * | * | ** | * * | * | * | 10 |
Cho & 2002 | / | * | / | * | ** | * | * | * | 7 |
Chung & 2017 | * | * | * | * | ** | ** | * | * | 10 |
Strelitz & 2021 | * | * | * | * | ** | ** | * | * | 10 |
Moazzeni &2021 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Casanova & 2020 | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Strelitz & 2019 | * | * | * | * | ** | ** | * | * | 10 |
Polemiti & 2021 | * | * | / | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
Cui & 2021 | * | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | 9 |
Aucott & 2016 | * | * | * | * | ** | ** | * | * | 10 |
Liu & 2020 | / | * | / | * | * | ** | * | * | 7 |
Notes: a = representativeness of exposed cohort; b = selection of the non-exposed cohort; c = ascertainment of cohort; d = that outcome of interest not present at the start of the study; e = comparability; f = assessment of outcome; g = follow-upped long enough until the outcomes occur; h = adequacy of follow-up of cohort