Table 7.
Monthly routine QA for EPID-based QA systems
| 2D PTQA | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Test | Technique | Metric | Tolerance |
| Dose constancy | 10 × 10cm static field | % Dose difference* | ±2% |
| 2D static field | 25 × 25cm static field | 2D γ | Baseline ± 2%† |
| Patient/test plan | IMRT | 2D γ | Baseline ± 2%† |
| Patient/test plan | VMAT | 2D γ | Baseline ± 2%† |
| Positioning | 25 × 25cm static field | Distance | ±2 mm (non-SBRT/SRS) |
| @ Cardinal angles | ±1 mm (SBRT/SRS) | ||
| Scaling | 25 × 25cm static field | Distance | ±2 mm |
| 2D Transit Dosimetry QA | |||
| Test | Technique | Comparison Method | Tolerance |
| Dose constancy | 25 × 25cm | % Dose difference | ±2% |
| 2D static field | 25 × 25cm | 2D γ | Baseline ± 3%† |
| Patient/test plan | IMRT | 2D γ | Baseline ± 3%† |
| Patient/test plan | VMAT | 2D γ | Baseline ± 3%† |
Mean dose of small area around the central axis no larger than 1 × 1 cm.
Baseline pass rates should be established during EPID QA system commissioning and deviations in the pass rate in either direction should be monitored. For example, if an institution’s baseline was 95% pass rate at (3%/2 mm), the tolerance limits should be 93–97% with ±2% tolerance and 92–98% with ±3% tolerance using the same criteria.