Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2024 Jun 25:rs.3.rs-4150225. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4150225/v1

Extended Data Fig. 1. Associations of sex and gender inequality with BAGs.

Multi-method approach comprising SHAP values, features and permutation importance. Plot shows the mean importance values for each method, along with their 99% confidence interval, as well as the average R-squared and Cohen’s F2. Having a neurocognitive disorder, being female, and living in countries with larger gender inequality (particularly from LAC), were associated with higher BAGs. LAC = Latin American countries.