Table 1.
Full dataset | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All participants n = 5306 | HCs = 3509 | MCI = 517 | AD = 828 | bvFTD = 463 | |||
fMRI dataset | |||||||
Variable | HCs Non-LAC n = 967 LAC n = 477 | MCI Non-LAC n = 215 LAC n = 169 | AD Non-LAC n = 214 LAC n = 505 | bvFTD Non-LAC n = 190 LAC n = 216 | Statistics Non-LAC vs. LAC | Post-hoc comparisons | |
Sex (F:M) | Non-LAC | 470:497 | 114:101 | 112:102 | 98:92 | χ2 = 2.19 | HC-MCI: p > 0.05 |
LAC | 261:216 | 84:85 | 262:243 | 105:111 | χ2 = 2.76 | HC-MCI: p > 0.05 | |
Age (years) | Non-LAC | 53.55 | 59.62 | 76.59 | 73.14 | F = 3.13 | HC-MCI: p > 0.05 |
LAC | 65.34 | 66.53 | 77.52 | 73.15 | F = 3.62 | HC-MCI: p > 0.05 | |
Years of Education | Non-LAC | 13.15 | 14.15 | 13.12 | 11.16 | F = 2.19 | HC-MCI: p > 0.05 |
LAC | 12.11 | 11.52 | 8.89 | 7.89 | F = 1.31 | HC-MCI: p > 0.05 | |
EEG dataset | |||||||
HCs Non-LAC n = 569 LAC n = 1486 | MCI LAC n = 133 | AD LAC n = 108 | bvFTD LAC n = 57 | Statistics Non-LAC vs. LAC | Post-hoc comparisons | ||
Sex (F:M) | Non-LAC | 470:99 | - | - | - | χ2 = 64.62 | - |
LAC | 954:532 | 111:22 | 85:23 | 39:18 | χ2 = 28.05 | HC-MCI: p > 0.05 | |
Age (years) | Non-LAC | 58.98 | - | - | - | t = 4.21 | - |
LAC | 66.74 | 62.54 | 78.62 | 71.05 | F = 7.62 | HC-MCI: p > 0.05 | |
Years of Education | Non-LAC | 14.85 (4.91 | - | - | - | t = 3.54 | - |
LAC | 13.92 | 8.12 | 10.75 | 14.38 | F = 6.31 | HC-MCI: p > 0.05 |
Results are presented as mean (SD). Asterisks (*) indicate an alpha level of p < 0.05. Demographic data comparing non-LAC and LAC groups were assessed using unpaired t-tests, while data for pathological groups were analyzed using ANOVAs followed by Tukey post-hoc pairwise comparisons, except for sex, which was analyzed using Pearson’s chi-squared (χ2) test. Effect sizes were calculated using partial eta squared (ηp2). Abbreviations: HC = healthy control, MCI = mild cognitive impairment, AD = Alzheimer’s disease, bvFTD = behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.