Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Jul 8;19(7):e0305910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305910

Fatty acids and chlorogenic acid content in Plectranthus edulis root tubers

Tsehaynew Fetene 1,2, Minaleshewa Atlabachew 1,*, Hailu Sheferaw 1, Chaltu Reta 1, Kidanemariam Teklay Hilawea 1
Editor: James Nyirenda3
PMCID: PMC11230528  PMID: 38976654

Abstract

This study quantified the fatty acid profile and total chlorogenic acid content of various Ethiopian cultivars of the Plectranthus edulis tuber, traditionally known as ’Agew Dinich’. Lipid extraction utilized the Folch method and the acid-catalyzed derivatization method to derivatize the fatty acids into fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) were used. Whereas maceration was used to extract chlorogenic acid from the fresh and freeze- dried tuber samples. Analysis revealed a total of thirteen fatty acids in all P. edulis samples, with nine classified as saturated and four as unsaturated. Palmitic acid was the most abundant fatty acid in P. edulis and accounted for 40.57%–50.21% of the total fatty acid content. The second and third most abundant fatty acids in the P. edulis sample were stearic and linoleic acids, which accounted for 8.38%–12.92% and 8.12%–11.28%, respectively. We reported chlorogenic acid for the first time in this potato species and found it to contain a concentration of 211± 4.2–300±24.7 mg/100g of dry weight basis when the determination was made using fresh samples. On the other hand, these samples yielded a chlorogenic acid concentration ranging from 115 ±8.6 mg/100g-175±3.9 mg/100g of freeze-dried powder samples. These findings suggest that P. edulis tubers could represent a significant dietary source of both chlorogenic acid and fatty acids.

Introduction

Potato is the most consumed food crop in the world, after wheat and rice. Potato is also Ethiopia’s fastest-growing primary food crop and a source of cash income for smallholder farmers. It is an essential crop for food security and a source of nutrients in underdeveloped nations and hence plays an important role in providing food security, revenue production, and employment opportunities [1]. Recently, the price of cereals has increased worldwide, and in Ethiopia, the price subsequently stabilized at a high level, whereas the price of roots and tubers remained relatively low during the entire food crisis. This requires the improvement of the seed potato systems operating in the country [2].

In terms of genetic resources, Ethiopia is one of the richest countries in the world. One of Ethiopia’s most economically productive edible tuber crops is P. edulis, also locally known as the Ethiopian potato. Its indigenous tuber crops are mostly grown in the highlands of the country. It’s usually called’ hunger crops’ as it fills the shortage of food between the period before cereal crop harvest, from August to November. In the community, it is commonly advised as a special diet for those who are recuperating from illness and serves as a medicinal plant; eating the boiled root can avoid loss of appetite [3].

P. edulis is also one of the most important tuber-producing plants whose potential has not been fully investigated and realized. According to a researcher, P. edulis is known by several dissimilar vernacular names in different parts of Ethiopia: Dinich Oromo in the Oromia region, Wolayta Donuwa around the Wolayta zone, Gamo Dinich around the Gamo Gofa zone, Agew Dinch in the Awi zone, and Gurage Dinich around the Gurage zone of Ethiopia [4]. The plant has been grown in mid and high-altitude areas ranging from 1880 to 2200 meters above sea level. P. edulis is one of the most popular meals in the aforementioned districts or zones and is frequently offered to distinguished guests visiting a household. It is traditionally recommended as a special diet in the community for those recovering from illness, most likely due to its greater digestability, open-up appetite while eaten, and believed to have some medicinal properties [5]. It has a wide variety of adaptations and was previously commonly grown in the central, southern, western, northwestern, and southwestern parts of Ethiopia [6].

Oil seeds are excellent natural sources of lipophilic chemicals that can be used in cosmetic, medicinal, and biofuel products. It is worthwhile to look at the possible sources of lipids found in fruits and fruit byproducts [7].The lipid composition and chlorogenic acid composition of tuber plants are regarded as important parameters to distinguish between varieties and regions of origin. Despite the importance of compound class in P. edulis, no information is available on the total lipid, individual fatty acids, and total chlorogenic acid compositions of P. edulis of the Amhara region, particularly in the Awi zone. However, each potato species’ quality and chemical composition differ depending on its cultivars, geographical origin, genotypic variation, agronomic factors, and environmental factors, including altitude, temperature, and soil [8].

Chlorogenic acids (CGA) are the main phenolic compounds. They are thought to have antioxidant capabilities, which may play a significant role in preserving food, tissues, and organs from oxidative degeneration. According to research, a diet rich in CGA compounds can help prevent a variety of diseases connected with oxidative stress, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, aging, and neurological disease [9].

Fatty acids originating from the diet have varying effects on the cardiovascular health of humans. Saturated fatty acids (SFA) have a somewhat favorable correlation with the risk of CVD, whereas trans fatty acids (TFA) have a strong and well-established link with the high risk of CVD. Poly- and mono-unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA and MUFA) generally lower the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) [10].The fatty acid composition of food is very important because lipids are one of the three major constituents of food. Their roles in biological tissues are: source of energy; components of biological membranes; a precursor for many different molecules [11]. Fruits, vegetable oils, seeds, animal fats, and fish oils are just a few examples of diverse sources of fatty acids [12]. Thus, monitoring the fatty acid composition of foods is an important process which can help maintain healthy life-style. However, most researchers in this area do not look at fatty acids and chlorogenic acids in P. edulis tubers collected from the Amhara region of the Awi zone, and its current production is declining to the extent of total extinction in several administrative regions.

Nowadays, P. edulis has been neglected in most parts of the regions where it is cultivated because consumers do not understand the important essential nutrients contained in the plant tuber, and hence it has not been promoted well. Therefore, the principal objective of this study was to identify and quantify the fatty acid and total chlorogenic acid constituents of Agew Dinich (P. edulis) from the Awi zone in the Amhara region. Thus, investigating its chemical composition will help traders and nutritionists promote the plant in other parts of the region. If so, farmers who cultivate this tuber will benefit if the market chain is expanded. Furthermore, this study may add scientific information to the scientific community.

Material and methods

Equipment

The study utilized a variety of laboratory equipment and instrumentation, including a freeze dryer (SCANVAC, Germany), a platform shaker (ZHWY-334, Shanghai ZHICHENG), a centrifuge (model 800–1), plastic bags, a GC-MS (Agilent Technologies 7890B-5977A, China), an electrical girder (FW-100, high-speed universal disintegrator girders), an oven (universal hot air oven, New Delhi-110020, India), an electronic balance, a constant temperature and humidity incubator, a fume hood (Neuberger, type AZ 150), a digital inverter technology refrigerator (Samsung), a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (HACH DR6000, Linderberg drive Loveland USA), and Acro disc syringe filters.

Reagents

The study employed a comprehensive selection of analytical-grade reagents and standards. A 99% pure pentadecanoic acid standard, a fatty acid compound, was utilized as an internal reference for the laboratory analyses. Additionally, the following high-purity chemical reagents were procured from reputable suppliers: Absolute, acetone-free methanol (99.00% purity) from Alpha Chemika. Chloroform (trichloromethane, CHCl3, 99.8% purity) from Loba Chemie. Toluene (99% purity) from Blulux Laboratory. n-Hexane (99.9% purity, AR grade) from Pentokay Organy (India) Ltd. Sulfuric acid (98% purity) from a supplier in India. Anhydrous sodium sulfate from Blulux Laboratory. Sodium chloride (99.9% purity) from Blulux Laboratory. Chlorogenic acid standards (99.9% purity) from Sigma Aldrich.

Sample collection and processing

The research was conducted under the approval and oversight of the research and community engagement vice dean office of the College of Science and Department of Chemistry at Bahir Dar University. During the 2022 crop harvest season, five samples were directly collected from farmers from five sub-districts of the Awi zone in the Amhara Region using a purposive sampling technique. Based on the information obtained from the Amhara Region Bureau of Agriculture, these five sub- districts are the zone’s most significant P. edulis-producing sub-districts, which contribute voluminous P. edulis tubers to the market. From each sampling site, 2 kg of P. edulis samples were collected. The collected samples were packed and labeled in polyethylene plastic bags and were transported to the Bahir Dar University laboratory for further treatment.

The samples were washed with tap water, rinsed twice with distilled water, and further rinsed with deionized water to remove soil and dust particles and to minimize the load of microorganisms or other impurities. The cleaned tubers of P. edulis were sliced into small pieces with the help of a sharp stainless-steel knife for quick drying. The dried samples were ground using an electric grinder and sieved with a 0.5 mm pore-sized sieve (Fig 1). The flour was sealed in a double zip-lock plastic bag for crude fat and fatty acid analysis [13].

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Photo of P. edulis tuber (A), P. edulis wash(B) and P. edulis slices (C) P. edulis flour(D).

Extraction of lipids

Lipids were extracted from the freeze-dried samples using the Folch method [4]. Briefly, 1.0 grams of P. edulis sample was taken in a test tube and mixed with 15 mL of chloroform and methanol (a 2:1 ratio v/v). The mixture was extracted for 36 hours on a platform shaker at 280 rpm then the extract was centrifuged, and the filtrate was taken (Fig 2). The lipid phase was separated with the aid of 2 mL of 0.73% aqueous sodium chloride, then the upper phase was removed by using a micropipette, and the lower phase (chloroform) layer containing the lipid was taken. The solvent was removed by letting the extract sit in a fume hood for two days, and the residue was reconstituted in 5.0 mL of toluene. The crude fat of each sample was calculated using the formula.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Extraction of lipids on platform shaker (A) and extracted lipids from P. edulis) (B).

%Crudefat=W2W1WS*100where,W2=massofthebeakerwithcrudefat,W1=massofemptybeakerand,Ws=massofsampleused. Eq (1)

Derivatization of fatty acids

The acid derivatization method was used to convert the fatty acids to the corresponding methyl ester [14]. Briefly, a 2.0 mL portion of the lipid extract in toluene was spiked with 50 μL of 3.48 mg/ml Penta decanoic acid were allowed to react for 12 hours with 2.0 mL of 1% sulfuric acid in methanolic solution while being kept at 50°C in an incubator. After that, the reaction mixture was treated with 5.0 mL of a 5% aqueous sodium chloride solution and extracted twice with 3 mL of hexane. After phase separation, the upper phase was taken away by using a micropipette (siphoning) and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered with an Acro disc syringe filter, transferred into the vial, and analyzed and submitted to GC-MS analysis.

GC-MS analysis

An Agilent Technologies 7890B gas chromatographic system equipped with an autosampler, a split spitless injector, and a mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies 7890B-5977B) was used for GC-MS analysis of the fatty acid methyl esters. The following were the chromatographic conditions: 280°C injector temperature, HP-5 MS UI- capillary column (30m x 250μm x 0.25m), temperature programming settings of 60°C (held for 3 minutes), then ramped at 5°C min-1 to 230°C (held for 20 minutes), total run time 60.8 minute and helium as carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 ml min-1. The mass spectrometer (MS) was run with the following parameters: transfer temperature of 280°C, scan range mz-1 of 40–600, ionization potential of 70 eV, and electron multiplier voltage of 935.9 volts.

Identification of the fatty acids

The fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were identified by comparing their retention times with respect to pure standard FAMEs purchased from Sigma Aldrich and analyzed under the same conditions [7].The identities of the detected fatty acids were determined by comparing the retention times and mass spectral fragmentation patterns of the fatty acids with the NIST-MS spectral library. In addition, a mixture of 19 reference standard fatty acid solutions was derivatized similar to the P. edulis extracts and analyzed by GC-MS. Then the retention time and fragment pattern of the sample’s fatty acid and the reference standard were compared. The fatty acids used as a reference standard are Heptanoic acid, Nonanoic acid, undecanoic acid, Tridecanoic acid, pentadecanoic acid, 9-hexadecenoic acid, Hexadecanoic acid, Heptadecanoic acid, 9Z,12Z-Octadecadienoic acid, 9-Octadecenoic acid, Nonadecanoic acid, Octadecanoic acid, 5,8,11,14- Eicosatetraenoic acid, Adipic acid, Eicosanoid acid, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19-Docosahexaenoic acid,13-Docosenoic acid, Adipic acid decyl 2,4-dimethyl-pent-3-methyl ester and Tricosanoic acid) compounds were analyzed. Out of nineteen mixed standard solutions seven were identified in P. edulis tuber samples. The identified mixed standards match with P. edulis samples are Nonanoic acid, 9- hexadecenoic acid, Hexadecanoic acid, 9Z,12Z, -Octadecadienoic acid, Heptadecanoic acid, 9- octadecenoic acid, and Eicosanoid acid.

Quantification of fatty acids

Thirteen fatty acids, with relative percentages of peak area higher than 0.1%, were quantified accurately and used for the geographical origin comparison of the P. edulis sample types. These fatty acids: pelargonic (C9:0), capric acid (C10:0), lauric (C12:0), azelaic (C10:0), myristic (C14:0), palmitoleic (C16:1), palmitic (C16:0), linoleic (C18:2), margaric (C17:0), vaccenic (C18:1), arachidic (C20:0), oleic acid (C18:1), and stearic acid (C18:0) were determined relative to the internal standard by using the following equation:[15].

Concentration(in%)=indvidualpeakareatotalpeakarea× Eq (2)

Statistical analysis

The recorded data were expressed as Mean ± SD (standard deviation) and were statistically analyzed using the statistical software package SPSS (IBM Corp., USA). A one-way ANOVA was used to test the presence of significant differences in the mean content of fatty acids. In contrast, an independent sample test was performed to evaluate the presence or absence of significant differences in chlorogenic acid between fresh and freeze-dried samples.

Determination of moisture content

To report the chlorogenic acid content of the samples on a dry weight basis, the moisture content was determined following the standard procedure. Briefly, 30 g of each P. edulis sample was accurately weighed in a crucible. The partially covered crucible was placed in the oven at 70°C for 6–12 hrs until the constant mass was obtained. Then the crucible was placed in a desiccator for 30 minutes to cool. The sample was reweighed after cooling and the percent of moisture was calculated.

Extraction of chlorogenic acid from fresh and freeze-dried samples for UV-Vis analysis

The extraction was performed from both fresh and freeze-dried P. edulis samples with acidified water. The fresh P.edulis tuber was sliced into thin pieces [16]. Exactly 1.5 g of sample was placed in a 100-ml beaker and extracted with 50 ml of 1% acidified water by using a magnetic stirrer extractor at room temperature. After 90 minutes, the extract was decanted and filtered. Similarly, for freeze-dried samples, 0.4g of sample was extracted with the same solvent, time, instrument, and procedure as the fresh sample extract. The supernatant was taken from both fresh and freeze-dried sample extracts with a micropipette and analyzed by UV-Vis with a scan range of 200–800 nm [17]. A six-point calibration curve of chlorogenic acid (1 ppm, 2 ppm, 5 ppm, 10 ppm, 15 ppm, 20 ppm, and 25 ppm) was constructed to quantify chlorogenic acid content of the samples. All the standards were scanned from 200–800 nm and the maximum absorbance was taken to construct the calibration curve.

Results and discussion

The moisture content of P. edulis sample ranged from 75.71% to 80.43%. This slight variation in the moisture content might be due to variation in the maturity stage of the tubers collected from the different districts of Awi Zone of Ethiopia.

Chlorogenic acids

The UV-Vis spectra of chlorogenic acid are presented in (Fig 3). Looking at the figure, as concentration increases, the absorbance of the chlorogenic acid increases without shifting the position of the wavelength (325nm) of absorption.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

UV-Vis spectra (A) and calibration curve (B) for the standard solution of chlorogenic acid.

The maximum absorbance value was taken for each concentration, and a calibration curve was constructed (Fig 3). Eq 1 shows the calibration curve equation generated from the calibration curve plot (Fig 3). The regression coefficient (R2 = 0.9947) value generated from the calibration curve confirmed that good linearity was obtained over a concentration range of 1–25 ppm when plotted as a function of absorbance value at their λ max.

y=0.05726x0.02692(Chlorogenicacids) Eq (3)

The UV-Vis spectra of the fresh and freeze-dried samples of each sample are presented in Figs 4 and 5.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

UV-Vis spectra of fresh and freeze-dried sample extracts from Lemma (A), Gambisi (B), Dangiya(C), and Betsena (D) sub-districts.

Fig 5. UV-Vis spectra of fresh and freeze-dried sample extracts from Zengena sub-district.

Fig 5

The concentration of chlorogenic acid in the fresh sample was determined and presented in Table 1, and the minimum (211± 4.2 mg/100g) and the maximum (300±24.7 mg/100g) in a dry weight basis were observed in samples from Lemma and Gambisi, respectively. The reason for the variation could be attributed to several factors such differences in moisture content, the harvesting method, agricultural practices, or environmental factors (soil, altitude, and sun exposure).

Table 1. Concentration of chlorogenic acid (mg/100g) determined from fresh P. edulis samples.

No Sample site Moisture content Absorbance Mass of fresh
Sample
Concentration of CGA on a fresh weight
Basis
Concentration of CGA converted to dry weight
Basis
1 Lemma 77% 0.81 1.5g 48.7mg
⁄100g
211 ±4.2
2 Gambisi 80.4% 0.97 1.5g 58mg
⁄100g
300±24.7
3 Dangiya 77.6% 0.93 1.5g 55.6mg
⁄100g
248±27.6
4 Betsena 78% 0.86 1.5g 51.2mg
⁄100g
235±4.9
5 Zengena 75.7% 0.89 1.5g 53mg
⁄100g
219±21.9

NB: Concentration of chlorogenic acid on a dry weight basis was obtained by considering the moisture content.

When freeze-dried samples were used, the concentration of chlorogenic acid ranged from 115±8.6 to 175±3.9 mg/100g in dry weight basisof the dried sample (Table 2). It was noted that chlorogenic acid significantly decreased upon freeze-drying as compared to the fresh samples. Independent sample t-test analysis revealed a significant difference in chlorogenic acid content between the fresh and freeze-dried samples. The decrease in chlorogenic acid during the drying process as compared to the fresh samples might be the fact that the freeze-drying process removes the protective water through sublimation while also exposing the sample to atmospheric oxygen. Without water present, some phytochemicals, including some isomers of chlorogenic acid, may be more susceptible to degradation and oxidation pathways. Additionally, cell disruption during freezing and dehydration can expose the phytochemicals to endogenous plant enzymes that remain active even after freeze-drying, potentially leading to enzymatic breakdown of these compounds [1821].

Table 2. Concentration of chlorogenic acid (mg/100g) determined from freeze-dried P. edulis samples.

No Sample site Absorbance Mass of Dray
sample
Concentration of CGA on a dry weight basis
1 Lema 0.56 0.4g 128±10.8
2 Gambisi 0.78 0.4g 175±3.9
3 Dangiya 0.75 0.4g 173±7.1
4 Betsena 0.5 0.4g 115±8.6
5 Zengena 0.68 0.4g 155±8.2

Reported studies indicated that the concentration of chlorogenic acid slightly decreased or decreased by half, and in some cases, the concentration of chlorogenic acid may also slightly increase or highly increase after freeze-drying the sample. For instance, freeze-drying slightly decreased the chlorogenic acid content in sweet potatoes from 154mg/g to 147mg/g [21]. For eggplant, freeze-drying was found to decrease the chlorogenic acid content by half—purple varieties went from 45% to 22%, and white varieties went from 97% to 49% [22]. Meanwhile, freeze-drying mulberry fruits slightly increased the chlorogenic acid content from 30mg/g to 33mg/g [23]. Grapes saw a highly increased chlorogenic acid content after freeze-drying, rising from 32.5mg/kg to 119.68mg/g [24]. Thus, the variation of the chlorogenic acid content with respect to freeze drying could depend on the nature of the plant material.

Crude fat content

The crude fat content varied from 5.04% for Zengena to 6.47% for samples from the Lemma sub- district (S1 Table). According to [4] the crude fat content of P. edulis (Oromo Dinich) was determined with the range of (5.01% -10.87%). The current result was obtained in conjunction with the prior report since it falls within the range of the previous results (5.01%–10.87%) for P. edulis tuber.

Besides the internal standard to confirm the identity of the fatty acids in P.edulis samples 19 mixed standards (Heptanoic acid, Nonanoic acid, Undecanoic-acid, Tridecanoic acid, pentadecanoic acid, 9-Hexadecenoic acid, Hexadecanoic acid, Heptadecanoic acid, 9Z,12Z-Octadecadienoic acid, 9- Octadecenoic acid, Nonadecanoic acid, Octadecanoic acid, 5,8,11,14- Eicosatetraenoic acid, Adipic acid, Eicosanoid acid, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19-Docosahexaenoic acid,13-Docosenoic acid, Adipic acid decyl 2,4-dimethylpent-3-methyl ester and Tricosanoic acid) compounds were analyzed. Out of nineteen mixed standard solutions seven were identified in P. edulis tuber samples. The identified mixed standards match with P. edulis samples are, Nonanoic acid, 9- hexadecenoic acid, Hexadecanoic acid, 9Z,12Z, -Octadecadienoic acid, Heptadecanoic acid, 9- octadecenoic acid, and Eicosanoid acid, to confirm the identity of the fatty acids (Table 3) and Fig 6.

Table 3. The chemical name, retention time (RT), and means of identification of fatty acids determined in the P. edulis sample.

SN CPD MAME Chemical formula Common name Means of Identification RT
1 Nonanoic acid (S) C9H18O2 Pelargonic acid NIST-MS+SD 18
2 Decanoic acid (S) C10H20O2 Capric acid NIST-MS 21
3 Dodecanoic acid(S) C12H24O2 Lauric acid NIST-MS 26.1
4 Nonane dioic acid (S) C10H18O4 Azelaic acid NIST-MS 26.7
5 Tetra decanoic acid (S) C14H28O2 Myristic acid NIST-MS 32.3
6 Pentadecanoic acid C15H30O2 (IS) NIST-MS 32.9
7 9-Hexadecenoic acid (Z)- C16H30O2 Palmitoleic acid NIST-MS+SD 34.5
8 Hexadecanoic acid (S) C16H32O2 Palmitic acid NIST-MS+SD 34.9
9 Heptadecanoic acid
(S)
C17H34O2 Margaric acid NIST-MS+SD 35.6
10 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z, Z) (uns) C18H32O2 Linoleic acid NIST-MS+SD 38.1
11 9-Octadecenoic acid (uns) C18H34O2 Oleic acid NIST-MS+SD 38.2
12 11-Octadecenoic acid (uns) C18H34O2 Vaccenic acid, NIST-MS 38.3
13 Methyl stearate (S) C18H36O2 Stearic acid NIST-MS 38.7
14 Eicosanoic acid (S) C20H40O2 Arachidic acid NIST-MS+SD 42.3

NIST- MS = National Institute of Standards and Technology-Mass Spectroscopy; SD = standard.

Fig 6. A Typical GC-MS chromatogram of (P. edulis ) extract, indicating the thirteen detected fatty acids.

Fig 6

Identification of the fatty acids in the P. edulis samples

A total of thirteen fatty acids, nine saturated and four unsaturated fatty acids were detected in all of the P. edulis samples. A representative chromatogram of the sample is indicated in Fig 6 and the identified fatty acids are listed in Table 3. In Addition, the chromatogram of the reference standard solution is depicted in (S1 Fig).

Fatty acid profile of P. edulis at sub-district level

The fatty acid compositions of the P. edulis samples from the five sub-districts studied are given in Table 4. The total fatty acid contents of the P. edulis tuber ranged from 96.55–97.91% in samples in five sub-districts. The amount of palmitic, Stearic, and, Linoleic acids in P. edulis samples were 40.57±2.46–50.21±1.39%, 8.37±2.20–12.92±4.56%, and 8.12±0.29–11.28±1.11% of the total fatty acids, respectively. According to [25] the amount of linoleic and palmitic acids in two species of potatoes, (Solanum phureja and S. tuberosum) was indicated at 45–52% and 18–20% of the total fatty acids, respectively. According to [4] the predominant fatty acids in P. edulis(Oromo Dinich )present were linoleic followed by α-linolenic and palmitic acid. This demonstrates that there is no agreement on the current outcomes. In this study, palmitic acid was the most common fatty acid, followed by stearic and linoleic acids. Environmental variables caused agricultural and harvesting techniques in the Awi zone to differ from those in the rest of the country.,

Table 4. The mean, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum fatty acid percentages in P. edulis from five sub-districts.

Five sub-districts of the Awi zone and the number of samples
Fatty
Acids
Betsena = 1 Dangia, n = 1 Zengena, n = 1 Gambisi, n = 1 Lemma, n = 1
Mean±SD Min Max Mean±SD Min Max Mean±SD Min Max Mean±SD Min Max Mean±SD Min Max P
Pelargonic
Acid
0.22±0.06 0.18 0.26 0.18±0.01 0.17 0.18 0.12±0.02 0.10 0.13 0.19±0.03 0.17 0.21 0.19±0.01 0.18 0.19 A
Capric
Acid
0.12±0.01 0.10 0.13 0.19±0.02 0.18 0.20 0.12±0.00 0.12 0.12 0.18±0.06 0.14 0.22 0.22±0.06 0.18 0.26 A
Lauric
Acid
0.41±0.04 0.39 0.44 0.42±0.05 0.38 0.45 0.27±0.01 0.26 0.28 0.37±0.03 0.35 0.39 048±0.04 0.46 0.51 A
Azelaic
Acid
0.18±0.02 0.17 0.19 0.32±0.08 0.26 0.38 0.16±0.02 0.15 0.18 0.25±0.13 0.15 0.34 0.22±0.06 0.18 0.27 A
Myristic
Acid
4.2±0.10 4.13 4.28 5.95±0.15 5.84 6.06 3.90±0.41 3.61 4.19 4.83±1.08 4.07 5.60 3.24±0.18 3.11 3.37 A
palmitoleic
acid
9±2.00 7.59 10.4
2
5.92±1.84 4.61 7.22 7.07±0.18 6.94 7.19 6.25±1.91 4.90 7.60 6.21±0.46 5.88 6.53 A
Palmitic
Acid
44±4.15 41.2
1
47.0
8
47.66±3.3
7
45.2
8
50.0
4
40.57±2.4
6
38.8
3
42.3
1
50.09±2.21 48.5
3
51.6
5
50.21±1.3
9
49.2
3
51.2
0
A
margaric
acid
0.68±0.06 0.64 0.72 0.51±0.04 0.49 0.54 0.52±0.01 0.52 0.52 0.56±0.11 0.48 0.64 0.66±0.36 0.40 0.91 A
Linoleic
Acid
9.59±1.74 8.36 10.8
1
8.12±0.29 7.92 8.33 11.28±1.1
1
10.4
9
12.0
6
8.45±0.83 7.87 9.04 10.16±1.2
3
9.29 11.0
3
A
Oleic acid 8.18±1.35 7.22 9.13 7.77±0.51 7.41 8.13 14.09±2.9
4
12.0
1
16.1
6
4.69±1.29 3.78 5.61 8.43±0.26 8.24 8.61 A
Vaccenic
Acid
8.86±2.03 7.43 10.3
0
5.96±1.71 4.75 7.18 5.16±0.35 4.92 5.41 4.87±0.31 4.65 5.09 3.84±0.32 3.61 4.07 A
Stearic
Acid
8.37±2.20 6.82 9.93 10.26±1.1
7
9.44 11.0
9
11.24±0.8
5
10.6
4
11.8
4
12.92±4.56 9.69 16.1
4
9.12±0.25 8.95 9.30 A
Arachidic
Acid
3.22±0.24 3.05 3.40 3.01±0.45 2.69 3.33 2.32±0.09 2.26 2.38 3.62±0.48 3.29 3.96 3.29±0.13 3.20 3.38 A
Total 97.5±14.1
1
97.1
7
97.8
2
96.57±9.7
7
96.5
5
96.5
9
97.12±8.4
9
97.1
2
97.1
3
97.70±13.0
6
97.4
8
97.9
1
96.74±4.7
6
96.6
8
96.7
9
A

P = probability level, A = not significant at p > 0.05.

The most common fatty acids present in P. edulis in the study of the five sub-districts are shown in Table 4. Among these, Pelargonic, Capric, Lauric, Azelaic, and margaric are present in trace amounts or modest concentrations of the total fatty acids and were identified in each sub-district and concentrations less than 1% of the total fatty acids. Among major fatty acids, Palmitic acid in P. edulis from all the five sub-districts: Lemma subdistrict has a higher concentration of palmitic acid than other Awi zone sub-districts. Stearic and linoleic acids were the second and third most prevalent fatty acids in the P. edulis sample, respectively. The observed variations in the fatty acid content between the P. edulis from the five different sub-districts of Awi zones can be ascribed to several factors, such as environmental growing conditions, agronomic factors, and harvesting conditions [26].

Regarding the agronomic factors, the P. edulis samples were processed by the same methods in all the sampling areas. However, because of the way the control and protection techniques for cultivation, the samples differed from farmer to farmer. Some farmers implemented best management methods such as soil preparation, adequate irrigation, crop fertilization, pest and disease management, and harvest and storage conditions s [27].

A statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA was performed to test the presence of significant differences in the fatty acid content of P. edulis between the five sub-districts of the Awi zone and it was noted that there was no significant difference in fatty acid content between and within a group of P. edulis samples sampled from five sub-districts (P>0.05).

The average fatty acid content (in %) present in P. edulis in the study of five different sub-districts of the Awi zone is shown in Fig 7. The Figure indicates that the contents of the average fatty acids in samples differ between subdistricts. Palmitic acid was discovered to be the main fatty acid in all sub-districts among the identified fatty acids. Stearic and linolic acids were the second and third most prevalent fatty acids in the P. edulis sample, respectively. The observed differences in the fatty acid content of P. edulis from the five different sub-districts can be attributed to a variety of factors, including land management systems, harvesting methods, agricultural practices, and environmental growing conditions [26].

Fig 7. Average fatty acid content of P. edulis sample in five districts of Awi zone.

Fig 7

Conclusion

The total crude fat and fatty acids in P. edulis samples representing selected sub-districts of the Awi zone were reported in this study. Among the determined fatty acids, Palmitic acid was found to be the major fatty acid in all samples. Stearic and linoleic acids were the second and third most prevalent fatty acids in the P. edulis sample, respectively. In addition, the studied tuber samples are rich in chlorogenic acid content. However, drying the samples could significantly reduce the chlorogenic acid content as compared to the fresh samples. In general, P. edulis tuber could be a good source of chlorogenic acid and fatty acids for individuals consuming the tuber. To have comprehensive phytochemical data on this P. edulis tuber, further studies are recommended, especially on the content of other phenolic acids, flavonoids, and amino acids.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Chromatogram of the mixed standards of nineteen mixed standard.

(TIF)

pone.0305910.s001.tif (324.4KB, tif)
S1 Table. Crude fat content of P. edulis.

(DOCX)

pone.0305910.s002.docx (16.1KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Bahir Dar University of Ethiopia for providing laboratory facilities.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Hailu M, Abebe S, Fikre D. Demonstration of Improved Potato Varieties At Koffele District, West Arsi Zone, Oromiya, Ethiopia. Int J Agric Ext Rural Dev Stud. 2020;7(3):45–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hirpa A, Meuwissen MPM, Tesfaye A, Lommen WJM, Oude Lansink A, Tsegaye A, et al. Analysis of Seed Potato Systems in Ethiopia. Am J Potato Res. 2010;87(6):537–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mekbib Y, Weibull J. Local customary use and management of Ethiopian potato (Plectranthus edulis (Vatke) Agnew in Sodo Zuria District, South Ethiopia. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2012;10:381–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gifty AG, De Meulenaer B, Olango TM. Variation in tuber proximate composition, sugars, fatty acids and amino acids of eight Oromo dinich (Plectranthus edulis) landraces experimentally grown in Ethiopia. J Food Compos Anal [Internet]. 2018;67(July 2017):191–200. Available from: 10.1016/j.jfca.2018.01.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aschale N, Tesfu K. Plectranthus Edulis (Vatke) Agnew in Ethiopia: A Review. Vol. 8, International Journal of Research in Agricultural Sciences. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garedew W, Tsegaye A, Tesfaye B, Mohammed H. Variability and Association of Quantitative Traits in Plectranthus edulis (Vatke) Agnew. East African J Sci. 2009;3(1):61–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Composition FA, Content TP. Fa tty A cids C omposition , T ot a l P henolics C ontent , A ntioxid a nt a nd A ntib a cteri a l A ctivities of A lgeri a n Z iziphus lotus L. (D esf. ) F ruit O il. 2023;1–26.
  • 8.Sampaio SL, Barreira JCM, Fernandes Â, Petropoulos SA, Alexopoulos A, Santos-Buelga C, et al. Potato biodiversity: A linear discriminant analysis on the nutritional and physicochemical composition of fifty genotypes. Food Chem. 2021;345(December 2020). doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tajik N, Tajik M, Mack I, Enck P. The potential effects of chlorogenic acid, the main phenolic components in coffee, on health: a comprehensive review of the literature. Vol. 56, European Journal of Nutrition. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2017. 2215–2244 p. doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1379-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Joshee K, Abhang T, Kulkarni R. Fatty acid profiling of 75 Indian snack samples highlights overall low trans fatty acid content with high polyunsaturated fatty acid content in some samples. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):1–15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Petrović M, Kezić N, Bolanča V. Optimization of the GC method for routine analysis of the fatty acid profile in several food samples. Food Chem. 2010;122(1):285–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hewavitharana GG, Perera DN, Navaratne SB, Wickramasinghe I. Extraction methods of fat from food samples and preparation of fatty acid methyl esters for gas chromatography: A review. Arab J Chem [Internet]. 2020;13(8):6865–75. Available from: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.06.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hailu Mitiku D, Fikadu Roro A. Nutritional Potential and Antnutritional Factors of <i>Plectranthus edulis</i>, <i>Cocciniaabyssinica</i> and <i>Dioscoreaabyssinica</i> Tubers: A Review. Sci Res. 2020;8(1):7. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mehari B, Redi-abshiro M, Chandravanshi BS, Combrinck S, Mccrindle R, Atlabachew M. GC-MS profiling of fatty acids in green coffee (Coffea arabica L .) beans and chemometric modeling for tracing geographical origins from Ethiopia. 2019;(October 2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Karanja JK, Mugendi BJ, Khamis FM, Muchugi AN. Determination of fatty acid and tocopherol contents of the oils. Ann Food Sci Technol. 2014;15(1):41–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McCarron P, Emteborg H, Hess P. Freeze-drying for the stabilisation of shellfish toxins in mussel tissue (Mytilus edulis) reference materials. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007;387(7):2475–86. doi: 10.1007/s00216-006-1104-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Atlabachew M, Habtemariam YT, Abebe A, Wubieneh TA. Rapid and simultaneous determination of trigonelline , caffeine , and chlorogenic acid in green coffee bean extract. 2021;(January):1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang L., Wen H., Yang N. and Li H., 2023. Effect of vacuum freeze drying and hot air drying on dried mulberry fruit quality. Plos one , 18 (6), p.e0283303. 2023;18(6):283303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nowak D, Jakubczyk E. The freeze-drying of foods⇔the characteristic of the process course and the effect of its parameters on the physical properties of food materials. Foods. 2020;9(10). doi: 10.3390/foods9101488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dalmau ME, Bornhorst GM, Eim V, Rosselló C, Simal S. Effects of freezing, freeze drying and convective drying on in vitro gastric digestion of apples. Food Chem [Internet]. 2017;215:7–16. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Long T, Chi C, Chen T, Yue S, Min J. ScienceDirect Effects of drying on caffeoylquinic acid derivative content and antioxidant capacity of sweet potato leaves. J Food Drug Anal [Internet]. 2014;(1018):1–8. Available from: 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zaro MJ, Ortiz LC, Keunchkarian S, Chaves AR. LWT—Food Science and Technology Chlorogenic acid retention in white and purple eggplant after processing and cooking. 2015;64:802–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Food I. Effects of two drying methods on the stability and antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds in mulberry fruits. 2021;28(February):83–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Çoklar H, Akbulut M. Effect of Sun, Oven and Freeze-Drying on Anthocyanins, Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Black Grape (Ekşikara) (Vitis vinifera L.). South African J Enol Vitic. 2017;38(2):264–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dobson G, Griffiths DW, Davies H V., McNicol JW. Comparison of fatty acid and polar lipid contents of tubers from two potato species, Solanum tuberosum and Solanum phureja. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52(20):6306–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ramadan MF, Oraby HF. Fatty acids and bioactive lipids of potato cultivars: An overview. J Oleo Sci. 2016;65(6):459–70. doi: 10.5650/jos.ess16015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ahmad U, Sharma L. a Review of Best Management Practices for Potato Crop Using Precision Agricultural Technologies. Smart Agric Technol [Internet]. 2023;4(February):100220. Available from: 10.1016/j.atech.2023.100220. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

James Nyirenda

19 Apr 2024

PONE-D-24-04087Fatty acids and chlorogenic acid content in Plectranthus edulis root tubersPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Atlabachew,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 03 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

James Nyirenda

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

3. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: 

"The authors would like to acknowledge Bahir Dar University of Ethiopia for providing laboratory

facilities. Mr. Tsehaynew Fetene is thankful to the Wollo university, Ethiopia, for sponsoring his

study"

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 

"The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 1,2 and 4 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The article is generally well written. The methods are described in detail and the results are presented logically in well-organized tables and graphs. The authors do perform basic statistical analysis to compare between the results.

Is the work technically sound? The research was done using standard methods that are replicable. The authors provide details on the sampling methods and how the samples were prepared. Detailed method of how the lipids and chlorogenic acid were extracted and analysed by GC-MS and UV vis spectroscopy (which authors can write in full) is provided.

Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? The authors perform basic statistical analysis to compare the fatty acid content in the tubers from the different sub-districts. However the authors can also compare statistically the composition of chlorogenic acid between the samples from the different sub-districts and also between the fresh and freeze-dried samples.

Data availability: The authors provide the results logically and well organized tables and graphs. However the Supplementary data can include the detailed tables of the raw results. These results generally should be based on work done and not reporting other people's work.

Overall presentation: The manuscript generally flows well, however the authors need to check on a number of grammatical errors in the text, spacing between word and P. eludis should be written in itallics throughout the document. Authors should avoid starting sentences with "Because..."

Additional comments to the authors:

Page 1, in the abstract correct linolic acid to read linoleic acid.

Authors should avoid starting sentences abruptly. For example under introduction on page 2 paragraph 3, sentence “The authors also indicated that in different growth areas of Ethiopia, a dissimilar vernacular name is used for P. eludis”. It is not clear which authors are being referred to.

On page 3, the statements "the tuber can be consumed after boiling to maintain appetite. Furthermore, it is asserted that no matter how much is consumed, the stomach remains unaffected" are misplaced. Authors can consider rephrasing their statements to make them clear and also cite relevant literature to support the statements.

On page 7, the formula for crude fat analysis, brackets needs to be correctly placed. Some equations are numbered whereas some are not. This should be consistent.

On page 14, the authors can expand on the discussion of how freeze drying is affecting the chlorogenic acid content and if alternative methods of preservation can be recommended. Authors need to cite the necessary literature when they discuss how freeze drying is causing a change to the structure and composition of cells.

On page 21, the authors can highlight the key limitations of the study and make recommendations based on their findings or propose what future studies can be done to build on to their work.

Reviewer #2: !. The language should be improved including in the Abstract and Materials and methods sections.

2. Improve the presentation in the methodology section including indicating the molar concentrations of prepared solvents.

3. Improve on clarity of other equations

4. In results section, express the findings using mean +- stdev to appreciate variations

5. Maintain one format for Figures (Fig or Figure)

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Evelyn Funjika

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Jul 8;19(7):e0305910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305910.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


3 Jun 2024

Replies to the technical comments of the Reviewers and the Editor

Manuscript ID: PONE-D-24-04087

We are very thankful to the reviewers and editor for their constructive criticism and valuable comments on our manuscript entitled "Fatty acids and chlorogenic acid content in Plectranthus edulis root tubers" and feel that they added a lot of value and clarity to the overall organization of the manuscript. We fully accepted all the issues raised and agreed that the issues raised should be addressed properly for better quality and acceptability of the manuscript. Therefore, we have revised our manuscript according to the editor and reviewers’ comments, and the changes that have been made in the revised manuscript, including texts and figures, are also highlighted with red font color.

The replies to the Reviewers’ and editor’s comments are given carefully below:

Response to Editor’s comment

Comment #1: Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Authors’ reply: Ok, thank you for your constructive criticism and comments. The manuscript style already meets PLOS ONE’s style requirements, including file naming, affiliations, spacing, level of heading, figure, table, and reference citations.

Comment #2: In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

Authors’ reply: We have included a statement “The research was conducted under the approval and oversight of the research and community engagement vice dean office of the College of Science and Department of Chemistry at Bahir Dar University” under the section “ sample collection and processing”.

Comment #3: We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match.

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

Authors’ reply: Ok, thank you for your constructive criticism, there is no funding information at all for this study.

Comment #4: Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"The authors would like to acknowledge Bahir Dar University of Ethiopia for providing laboratory facilities. Mr. Tsehaynew Fetene is thankful to the Wollo university, Ethiopia, for sponsoring his study"

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Authors’ reply: Sorry for these missed interpretations about funding information and financial disclosure, and the authors removed any funding-related text from the manuscript. We have included funding information in the revised cover letter for your assistance in updating it in the online submission form.

Comment #5: Please ensure that you refer to Figure 1,2 and 4 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

Authors’ reply: We have now cited Figures 1, 2, and 4 in the text as Fig 1, 2, and 4 respectively.

Response to Reviewer: 1

The article is generally well written. The methods are described in detail and the results are presented logically in well-organized tables and graphs. The authors do perform basic statistical analysis to compare between the results.

Authors’ reply: We thank your esteemed reviewer for the constructive feedback and appreciation of our study.

Is the work technically sound? The research was done using standard methods that are replicable. The authors provide details on the sampling methods and how the samples were prepared. Detailed method of how the lipids and chlorogenic acid were extracted and analyzed by GC-MS and UV vis spectroscopy (which authors can write in full) is provided.

Authors’ reply: We thank your esteemed reviewer for the constructive feedback and appreciation of our study.

Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? The authors perform basic statistical analysis to compare the fatty acid content in the tubers from the different sub-districts. However, the authors can also compare statistically the composition of chlorogenic acid between the samples from the different sub-districts and also between the fresh and freeze-dried samples.

Authors’ reply: We thank the suggestion of our reviewer. We have now used an independent sample t-test to compare the variation of chlorogenic acid content in the freeze-dried and fresh samples. The detailed analysis data is included on page 14, in the last paragraph.

Data availability: The authors provide the results logically and well-organized tables and graphs. However, the Supplementary data can include the detailed tables of the raw results. These results generally should be based on work done and not reporting other people's work.

Authors’ reply: We appreciate the feedback given, and we have removed a table containing reported data from the supplementary material document. The corresponding content from the removed table has been discussed in the manuscript (page 14, last paragraph).

Overall presentation: The manuscript generally flows well; however, the authors need to check on a number of grammatical errors in the text, spacing between word and P. eludis should be written in itallics throughout the document. Authors should avoid starting sentences with "Because..."

Authors’ reply: We have checked grammar and other issues, and corrected them in the revised

Additional comments to the authors:

Page 1, in the abstract correct linolic acid to read linoleic acid.

Authors’ reply: We appreciate our reviewer's eagle eye view. We have corrected "linolic acid" to "linoleic acid."

Authors should avoid starting sentences abruptly. For example, under introduction on page 2 paragraph 3, sentence “The authors also indicated that in different growth areas of Ethiopia, a dissimilar vernacular name is used for P. eludis”. It is not clear which authors are being referred to.

Authors’ reply: We have now significantly edited the paragraph to make it more clear. We have also cited proper references.

On page 3, the statements "the tuber can be consumed after boiling to maintain appetite. Furthermore, it is asserted that no matter how much is consumed, the stomach remains unaffected" are misplaced. Authors can consider rephrasing their statements to make them clear and also cite relevant literature to support the statements.

Authors’ reply: We have now rephrased the statement the tuber can be consumed after boiling to maintain appetite. Furthermore, it is asserted that no matter how much is consumed, the stomach remains unaffected" and cited a proper reference for it. The revised stament can be seen on page 3, first paragraph.

On page 7, the formula for crude fat analysis, brackets need to be correctly placed. Some equations are numbered whereas some are not. This should be consistent.

Authors' reply: We appreciate the comments. We have corrected all the issues our reviewer raised. The corrected section is as follows:

formula for the crude fat is %Crude fat = ( (W2-W1)/WS)*100 where, W2 = mass of the beaker with crude fat, W1= mass of empty beaker and, WS= mass of sample used. ¬¬¬¬¬----eq (1).

On page 14, the authors can expand on the discussion of how freeze drying is affecting the chlorogenic acid content and if alternative methods of preservation can be recommended. Authors need to cite the necessary literature when they discuss how freeze drying is causing a change to the structure and composition of cells.

Authors' reply: We fully agree with this suggestion, The following information is included on page 14. “ The decrease in chlorogenic acid during the drying process as compared to the fresh samples might be the fact that the freeze drying process removes the protective water through sublimation while also exposing the sample to atmospheric oxygen. Without water present, some phytochemicals, including some isomers of chlorogenic acid, may be more susceptible to degradation and oxidation pathways. Additionally, cell disruption during freezing and dehydration can expose the phytochemicals to endogenous plant enzymes that remain active even after freeze-drying, potentially leading to enzymatic breakdown of these compounds.

On page 21, the authors can highlight the key limitations of the study and make recommendations based on their findings or propose what future studies can be done to build on to their work.

Authors' reply: We have now suggested possible future studies to have compressive phytochemical content information in this tuber ( page 22, last paragraph).

Response to Reviewer: 2

The language should be improved including in the Abstract and Materials and methods sections.

Authors’ reply: We have thoroughly edited the language throughout the manuscript.

improve the presentation in the methodology section including indicating the molar concentrations of prepared solvents.

Authors’ reply: We have included the details on the concentration of solution prepared for this particular experiment.

Improve on clarity of other equations

Authors’ replyWe have edited the equation. We assigned equation number for each equation in the manuscript.

In results section, express the findings using mean mean ± stdev stdev to appreciate variations

Authors’ we have now reported our data in the result and discussion section as mean ± standard deviation

Maintain one format for Figures (Fig or Figure)

Authors’ reply: The format for the Figures for this manuscript is maintained by Fig.

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Authors’ reply: “ yes”

Decision Letter 1

James Nyirenda

7 Jun 2024

Fatty acids and chlorogenic acid content in Plectranthus edulis root tubers

PONE-D-24-04087R1

Dear Dr. Atlabachew,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

James Nyirenda

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

James Nyirenda

27 Jun 2024

PONE-D-24-04087R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Atlabachew,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. James Nyirenda

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Chromatogram of the mixed standards of nineteen mixed standard.

    (TIF)

    pone.0305910.s001.tif (324.4KB, tif)
    S1 Table. Crude fat content of P. edulis.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0305910.s002.docx (16.1KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES