Table 6. Comparison of students’ feedback after virtual clinical scenario and role play.
Question: I think virtual clinical scenario/role play | Group | P- value |
---|---|---|
Diagnostic skills | ||
1. helped in diagnosis | Virtual clinical scenario | 0.014* |
Role play | ||
2. interpret variations in clinical presentation of oral lesions/conditions | Virtual clinical scenario | 0.004* |
Role play | ||
3. increased my confidence in diagnosing oral lesions without additional help | Virtual clinical scenario | <0.001* |
Role play | ||
Visual parameters | ||
1. I found color of lesion important for diagnosis. | Virtual clinical scenario | 0.001* |
Role play | ||
2. I found size of lesion important for diagnosis | Virtual clinical scenario | 0.087 |
Role play | ||
3. I found surface appearance important for diagnosis | Virtual clinical scenario | 0.850 |
Role play | ||
Impact on learning | ||
1. increased my willingness to learn oral pathology | Virtual clinical scenario | 0.010* |
Role play | ||
2. made me more concentrated in learning diagnostic skills in oral pathology | Virtual clinical scenario | 0.014* |
Role play | ||
3. improves in retention of knowledge related to diagnosing oral lesions | Virtual clinical scenario | <0.001* |
Role play | ||
4. contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of oral pathology concepts | Virtual clinical scenario | <0.001* |
Role play | ||
5. is applicable to content covered in oral pathology curriculum | Virtual clinical scenario | 0.180 |
Role play | ||
6. scenarios were realistic and relevant | Virtual clinical scenario | 0.001* |
Role play | ||
7. will have significant impact in my future performance | Virtual clinical scenario | 0.010* |
Role play |
*P < 0.05. Mann-Whitney U test.