Table 2.
miRNA | Elias et al. | Our study | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
log2FC | p-value | beta | p-value | Interpretation | |
miR-200c-3p | 1.56 | 0.000 | 0.08 | 0.27 | No change over time |
miR-320d | 1.06 | 0.000 | 0.01 | 0.88 | No change over time |
miR-320c | 0.79 | 0.000 | 0.02 | 0.78 | No change over time |
miR-200a-3p | 1.03 | 0.000 | 0.15 | 0.04 | Concordant and significant trend |
miR-1307–5p | 0.50 | 0.000 | -0.04 | 0.59 | No change over time |
miR-1246 | 1.10 | 0.001 | 0.13 | 0.08 | Concordant and non-significant trend |
miR-203a-3p | 1.05 | 0.001 | 0.12 | 0.11 | Concordant and non-significant trend |
miR-450b-5p | 0.87 | 0.002 | 0.06 | 0.44 | No change over time |
miR-23b-3p | 0.60 | 0.003 | 0.14 | 0.07 | Concordant and non-significant trend |
miR-32–5p | 0.56 | 0.004 | 0.08 | 0.32 | No change over time |
miR-335–5p | 0.48 | 0.004 | -0.02 | 0.80 | No change over time |
miR-29a-3p | 0.48 | 0.011 | 0.05 | 0.50 | No change over time |
miR-92a-3p | -0.21 | 0.126 | -0.03 | 0.71 | No change over time |
miR-150–5p | 0.04 | 0.883 | -0.01 | 0.91 | No change over time |
miRNAs were considered concordant if they exhibited similar increase/decrease over time prior to diagnosis (linear regression beta coefficient and p-value) when compared to up-/downregulation (log2 fold-change; log2FC) reported in the Elias paper. Beta coefficients close to 0 (-0.1 < beta < 0.1) were interpreted as a lack of temporal trend.