Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 25;14:1389066. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1389066

Table 2.

Temporal linear trends in selected miRNAs prior to ovarian cancer diagnosis compared to differential expression results observed in comparison between ovarian cancer cases and controls in original paper by Elias et al. (eLife 2017).

miRNA Elias et al. Our study
log2FC p-value beta p-value Interpretation
miR-200c-3p 1.56 0.000 0.08 0.27 No change over time
miR-320d 1.06 0.000 0.01 0.88 No change over time
miR-320c 0.79 0.000 0.02 0.78 No change over time
miR-200a-3p 1.03 0.000 0.15 0.04 Concordant and significant trend
miR-1307–5p 0.50 0.000 -0.04 0.59 No change over time
miR-1246 1.10 0.001 0.13 0.08 Concordant and non-significant trend
miR-203a-3p 1.05 0.001 0.12 0.11 Concordant and non-significant trend
miR-450b-5p 0.87 0.002 0.06 0.44 No change over time
miR-23b-3p 0.60 0.003 0.14 0.07 Concordant and non-significant trend
miR-32–5p 0.56 0.004 0.08 0.32 No change over time
miR-335–5p 0.48 0.004 -0.02 0.80 No change over time
miR-29a-3p 0.48 0.011 0.05 0.50 No change over time
miR-92a-3p -0.21 0.126 -0.03 0.71 No change over time
miR-150–5p 0.04 0.883 -0.01 0.91 No change over time

miRNAs were considered concordant if they exhibited similar increase/decrease over time prior to diagnosis (linear regression beta coefficient and p-value) when compared to up-/downregulation (log2 fold-change; log2FC) reported in the Elias paper. Beta coefficients close to 0 (-0.1 < beta < 0.1) were interpreted as a lack of temporal trend.