Abstract
Purpose of Review
Chagas disease (CD) is a neglected tropical disease from the American continent that commonly causes cardiovascular disease. Some patients develop neurological manifestations. We discuss and summarize the pathogenesis, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of the central nervous system manifestations of CD.
Recent Findings
Cerebrospinal fluid quantitative polymerase chain reaction tests and next-generation sequencing in tissue samples have facilitated disease diagnosis and follow-up. Novel presentations, including retinitis, are now reported. A new MRI sign called “Bunch of açai berries appearance”—multiple hypointense nodular lesions—has been described recently. Treatment with benznidazole at higher doses and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring need to be further studied in this setting.
Summary
A high suspicion index is paramount to diagnosing Chagas’ central nervous system involvement. Standardized molecular diagnostics can aid in the initial workup. Future development of new therapeutic drugs is crucial because of the toxicity profile of the currently available medications.
Keywords: Chagas disease, Trypanosoma cruzi, CNS infection, Meningitis, Cerebral protozoal infections, American trypanosomiasis
Introduction
Approximately six million individuals are estimated to be affected by Chagas disease (CD) in the Americas. In the USA alone, 288,000 people were estimated to be infected as of 2022 [1]. The global average incidence of the disease is reported to be around 30,000 cases per year, resulting in approximately 12,000 deaths annually. CD is considered endemic in 21 countries across the Americas. Still, due to population mobility, the infection has also spread to regions outside the traditional endemic areas, including Europe, North America, Asia, and Oceania [2, 3]. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement reports are described in patients with acute disease, children, elderly persons, patients living with HIV (PWH), and other immunocompromised hosts [4]. Meningoencephalitis is the primary cerebral manifestation observed in acute CD [5]. Patients with reactivation disease can have cerebral tumor-like lesions called “CNS chago-mas.” During the chronic phase of the disease, ischemic stroke is the primary cerebral manifestation observed [6]; dementia, confusion, chronic encephalopathy, and sensory and motor deficits are less common [7]. We discuss and summarize the pathogenesis, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of the central nervous system manifestations of CD.
Pathogenesis
Chagas disease is primarily transmitted through insect vector bites, considered the classic transmission mode. However, other routes exist, including via the placenta, transfusions, transplants, and oral [7]. CNS infection by T. cruzi is commonly observed during the acute phase when parasitemia is at its peak. In animal models, T. cruzi infection in newborn rats has shown the detection of parasites within glial cells, near neuronal somas, capillaries, and venules in the cerebral and cerebellar cortices, as well as the thalamic subcortical nucleus during the peak of parasitemia [8]. This localization suggests a potential invasion of the brain parenchyma through the blood-brain barrier vessels [9]. However, parasites and inflammatory changes are evident in the basal ganglia when parasitemia is no longer detectable [10]. Encephalitis typically occurs during the acute phase and coincides with the abundant presence of trypomastigotes in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [11].
Experimental acute and chronic T. cruzi infections have revealed the presence of inflammatory infiltrates in various areas of the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, such as the choroid plexus and hippocampus [12, 13]. Additionally, amastigote nests have been observed in the cerebellar neuropil region [13] and below the pia mater in the ependymal cells that form the glia limitans at the brain surfaces [14]. These suggest that T. cruzi can cross the endothelium of leptomeningeal venules in the subarachnoid space, traverse the pia mater, reach the glia limitans, and access the brain parenchyma. The infection of the glia limitans may explain the cerebellar T. cruzi infection, as there is a neural connection between the glia and the cerebellum [8, 10]. Other less frequently infected regions include the hippocampus and areas without a blood-brain barrier, such as the choroid plexus [15].
The interaction between the parasite-derived trans-sialidase (TS) and tyrosine-protein kinase receptors (TrkA and TrkC), commonly upregulated during CNS injury and infections, may promote parasite replication and tissue damage [15, 16]. These interactions facilitate parasite adherence and efficient invasion of neuronal, epithelial, and phagocytic cells both in vitro and in vivo [17] while also activating mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathways, as observed in infected PC12 cell lines, a well-established model of neuronal differentiation [7, 18]. Muscarinic cholinergic pathways have also been implicated in immune-mediated cell invasion in mouse models [19].
The invasion of T. cruzi promotes the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines systemically and within the CNS. Experimental evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies has shown that glial cells expressing interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) are associated with astrocyte invasion [20, 21], In murine models of acute T. cruzi infection, plasma TNF-α levels and CNS TNF messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression have been observed, along with higher parasitemia and mortality rates in orally infected mice [22]. Additionally, parasite infection induces astrocytes to adopt a pro-inflammatory profile characterized by enhanced production of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and TNF-α, as well as increased tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1) expression, thereby creating a self-sustaining inflammatory loop that promotes parasitic replication [21].
A parasite-derived enzyme, cruzipain, cleaves plasma kininogens into bradykinin, activating endothelial brad-ykinin-B2 receptors and the protein-G immune pathway [23]. Furthermore, in vitro studies suggest that T. cruzi may migrate through brain endothelial cells paracellularly without disrupting the cell monolayer, possibly mediated by bradykinin and the chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) gradient [24].
CNS Chagas disease can be attributed to direct parasite invasion or indirect effects of local and systemic inflammation in response to the infection [19]. Meningoencephalitis, a manifestation of CNS CD, is characterized by T. cruzi nests, which are inflammatory nodules primarily composed of parasites, mononuclear cells, and glial cells within the brain [20]. Amastigote nests can be observed in the neuropil of cerebellar gray matter nuclei even without detectable inflammatory processes [22], T. cruzi has been detected in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland following infection, and several alterations and injuries in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis have been reported [7, 13, 25].
Experimental studies have demonstrated that T. cruzi can infect microglia, macrophages, and astrocytes [24, 25]. Histological examinations and in vitro evidence have shown a high frequency of parasite nests without surrounding membranes in non-glial cells, as well as the presence of parasites in astrocyte processes among Purkinje cell bodies in the cerebellum [8, 21].
Histological examinations of T. cruzi–infected rodents have revealed damage in various regions of the CNS, characterized by neuronal loss, the formation of glial nodules due to astrocyte proliferation, edema, and enlargement of perivascular spaces. These alterations are accompanied by the presence of mononuclear cellular infiltrates both around blood vessels and within the parenchyma [25]. Astrocytes appear to have limited control over T. cruzi infection compared to microglial cells, as they secrete interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and nitric oxide (NO), which may render them more susceptible to parasite replication [26]. Furthermore, astrocytic processes surrounding CNS blood vessels may serve as a potential route for parasite invasion, particularly in the gray matter where capillary density is higher than in the white matter [27, 28].
In experimental models, mice acutely infected with T. cruzi exhibit elevated cerebral oxidative stress and micro-circulatory changes, including endothelial dysfunction, increased leukocyte rolling and adhesion, vascular obstruction, and reduced functional capillary density [27]. Ischemic strokes have been found to induce the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), triggering the coagulation cascade and activating complement, platelets, and endothelial cells. Additionally, an increase in adhesion molecules, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is observed, leading to vessel constriction and increased vulnerability to ischemia in the brain [28].
Chronic CD patients can experience depressive behavior, possibly associated with oxidative stress and heightened pro-inflammatory cytokines [29], Depressive behavior in murine models can be induced by pro-inflammatory cytokines and pathogen-associated molecular patterns, such as lipopolysac-charide (LPS) and polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poli:IC) [30]. During CNS infection by T. cruzi, TNF-α, IL-1β, and NO are released by macrophages, microglia, and astrocytes and are believed to contribute to the neurological alterations observed in CD [31, 32].
Furthermore, cognitive deficits can occur in chronically T. crazi–infected mice without neuroinflammation. These cognitive alterations have been associated with the persistence of T. cruzi and increased lipid peroxidation in the hippocampus and cortex of the CNS [33].
Another theory that needs to be further studied is molecular mimicry as a mechanism of pathogenesis of CNS CD. A human antibody against T. cruzi tubulin has been demonstrated to cross-react with a human neural protein of the central and peripheral nervous system [34].
Risk Factors
In countries endemic to CD, such as Argentina, Brazil, and Bolivia, the prevalence of T. cruzi coinfection PWH ranges from 1 to 32% [35–38]. Due to their compromised cellular immunity, untreated PWH have an increased risk of T. cruzi reactivation. Reactivation commonly manifests as CNS involvement [39–41] and, if left untreated, carries a high mortality rate (79–100%) [42, 43]. The reactivation in such cases is associated with brain tissue damage linked to increased IL-17 expression and low peripheral blood CD4 T cell counts [4, 44]. Also, reactivation of CD is associated with increases in HIV RNA load [45]. Recipients of solid organ transplants are also susceptible to T. cruzi reactivation [46]. CNS reactivation has been observed in renal transplantation [47, 48], heart transplantation [49–51], as well as in patients with leukemia [52] and after stem cell transplantation [53]. A rare case of CNS Chagas due to reactivation disease was reported in a patient without identifiable immunosuppression [54].
Clinical Manifestations
Chagas disease presents a wide array of clinical syndromes divided into two phases: acute and chronic. Chronic can be subdivided into an indeterminate and a determinate form. During the chronic phase, reactivation can occur [55, 56]. The development and severity of each phase and form largely depend on the interplay between the parasitic virulence, the transmission route, and the host’s immunity [57].
Primary Lesion
The primary lesion is an inflammatory-erythematous macule called inoculation “chagoma” [58]. It can be up to 10 cm in diameter and correlates with the entry site of the trypomastigote through the skin [58]. It occurs in less than half of patients bitten by a triatomine bug [59]. Alternatively, suppose the route of inoculation is through the conjunctiva. In that case, the primary lesion will present as a unilateral violaceous palpebral edema with painless conjunctivitis and cervical lymphadenopathy, known as Romana’s sign—which may last up to 2 months [60].
Acute Chagas
The acute phase follows the appearance of the primary lesion by about 14 days and lasts up to 30–60 days approximately [61]. When present, the clinical course consists of unexplained high and prolonged fever, myalgia, malaise, headache, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, or anasarca [57, 62]—yet the vast majority of cases (65–99%) present with few or no symptoms at all [62]. Facial edema, gingivitis, and dry cough have been reported due to the penetration of the parasite through the oral cavity, lips, or pharyngeal mucosa [63]. Rarely (fewer than 1% of cases) can it be associated with potentially fatal complications such as acute myocarditis, pericardial effusion, encephalitis, or meningoencephalitis [4, 64]. Because this phase is due to circulation and intense tissue parasitism, it can be vertically transmitted to the offspring in gravid patients [65, 66]. Those with CD acquired orally, through blood transfusion or organ transplantation, are at higher risk of complications during the acute phase [67].
Chronic Chagas
Following the mostly asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic acute phase of CD—in which only a few are treated—the infection progresses to a chronic phase [68]. About 60–90% of cases will be diagnosed in the indeterminate form, in which patients are serologically positive but asymptomatic [68]. Nearly 2% of patients will develop cardiomyopathy after the initial asymptomatic chronic indeterminate form [68, 69], In the former, destruction of the cardiac conduction system and myocardium by tissue amastigotes may present as a clinical spectrum, including conduction abnormalities (e.g., right bundle branch block, left anterior hemiblock, atrioventricular block, or ventricular arrhythmias), apical aneurysms, thromboembolism, and dilated cardiomyopathy [67, 70]. In the chronic digestive form, the loss of ganglion cells in the myenteric plexus results in dysphagia, regurgitation, retrosternal chest pain, odynophagia, constipation, changes in bowel habits, rectal straining, and tenesmus that correlates with esophageal and colonic dilation, respectively [71].
Reactivation of Chagas
Reactivation of CD occurs when the immunity of a chronically infected host is suppressed and causes the reappearance of acute symptoms [72]. It is diagnosed by detecting T. cruzi in tissue or body fluids (e.g., blood, CSF, ascitic fluid, pericardial fluid) with or without clinical symptoms. Even though reactivation is rare, mortality is estimated to be above 70% [7, 71]. When present in PWH, it commonly affects the central nervous system (75–90%) as meningoencephalitis or CNS Chagoma [48, 68, 73]. Cardiac involvement in PWH is the second most common form of reactivation. It presents with rapid progression of chronic cardiomyopathy, new-onset arrhythmias, pericardial effusion, and acute myocarditis [51, 68]. Neurologic and cardiac complications occur concurrently in about 10% of cases [62, 71, 73]. Rarely, CD reactivates in the form of spontaneous peritonitis, ocular myositis, and erythema nodosum, among others [74].
Reactivation of CD is more commonly associated with AIDS (75–80%) and is considered an AIDS-defining illness in endemic areas [54, 68]. However, other causes of immunosuppression, such as hematologic malignancies, prolonged corticosteroid use, hematologic or solid organ transplant, chemotherapy recipients, or pregnancy, have also been described as causes of reactivation [72, 75–77].
Neurologic Complications of Chagas Disease
T. cruzi can affect the central, peripheral, and autonomic nervous system, and a clinical spectrum of neurologic complications has been described in all phases and forms of the disease that may range from asymptomatic infection to long-term disability and death. Clinical presentation and risk factors are displayed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Clinical presentation and risk factors for neurologic disease in American trypanosomiasis
| Neurologic syndrome | Clinical features | Phase of disease | Risk factors and other considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central nervous system | |||
| Chagasic meningoencephalitis | Asymptomatic, fever, headaches, vomiting, altered mental status, seizures, ataxia or another focal neurologic deficit, coma. | Acute phase | Infants <2 years of age, immunosuppression*, risk of transmission to offspring in pregnancy |
| Reactivation phase | Immunosuppression* | ||
| CNS Chagoma | Asymptomatic, focal neurologic deficit, fever, headache, vomiting, seizures, altered mental status, ataxia, coma. | Reactivation | Immunosuppression* |
| Stroke | Asymptomatic (silent microemboli), focal neurologic deficit (more commonly MCA syndrome), altered mental status, seizures at stroke onset. | Chronic | Chagasic cardiomyopathy |
| Neurocognitive impairment and psychiatric disease | Possible neurocognitive decline, anxiety, and depression. | Chronic | Unknown |
| Retinitis | Blurry vision and eye pain | Reactivation | Immunosuppression* |
| Peripheral nervous system | |||
| Peripheral neuropathy | Sensory-motor peripheral neuropathy. | Chronic | Therapy with benznidazole or nifurtimox |
| Autonomic neuropathy and gastrointestinal dysfunction | Megaesophagus: dysphagia, regurgitation, retrosternal chest pain, and odynophagia. Megacolon: constipation, changes in bowel habits, rectal straining, and tenesmus |
Chronic | Southern Cone in South America |
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), hematologic malignancies, chemotherapy, prolonged/high-dose corticosteroids, hematologic or solid organ transplant recipients, or pregnancy
Central Nervous System Involvement
Chagasic Meningoencephalitis
It can present with encephalitis or meningoencephalitis [78]. Rarely does it occur during the acute phase (5–10% of cases) [62, 71, 78], yet when it does, it typically involves children under 2 years of age (including congenital disease), followed by immunocompromised and elderly individuals.
During the acute phase, chagasic encephalitis is invariably associated with myocarditis [62, 71, 79]. In contrast, reactivation of CD occurs almost universally under various forms of immunosuppression—particularly AIDS [79]—and can be the first opportunistic infection in AIDS [80]. It is relevant to mention that neurological manifestations are less common in transplant patients than in AIDS [81]. A series of chagasic patients with CNS disease CD4 counts ranged between 63 and 126 cells/m3, associated with exceptionally high mortality [79, 81]. During the reactivation of CD, myocarditis may or may not be present [79, 82]. Clinical presentation in both the acute phase and during reactivation is a clinical spectrum that ranges from asymptomatic parasitorraquia or mild alteration in mental status to headaches, lethargy, mood changes, focal neurologic deficit, seizures, stupor, coma, and death [82–84]. The main differential diagnosis here is toxoplasma encephalitis
Cerebral Tumor-like American Trypanosomiasis or CNS Chagoma
During the reactivation, another common presentation of CD is a space-occupying lesion in the CNS (brain, cerebellum, or spinal cord). It presents as ring-enhancing single or multiple lesions in the supratentorial white matter, yet masses have been reported everywhere in the CNS [83–85]. Like chagasic meningoencephalitis, CNS Chagoma disproportionately presents among those with suppressed immune systems, especially AIDS [39, 47, 50, 52, 86, 87]. It is clinically and radiologically indistinguishable from other opportunistic CNS masses due to infectious and non-infectious causes [71, 86]. As in chagasic meningoencephalitis, brain chagoma must be included in the differential of intracranial lesions in an immunocompromised patient when coming from an endemic area, particularly when lesions fail to respond to therapy against Toxoplasma spp. [71, 88]. Following the resolution of the infection, patients may have residual hemiparesis [62, 79]. Infrequently, CNS Chagoma can be an expression in the acute phase of the disease [5, 86]. The prognosis is generally poor [89–91], reaching nearly 100% mortality in untreated patients.
Ischemic Stroke
CD is an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke [28]. Chagas-related strokes are rare (1–3% of patients), yet they account for 10–52% of Chagas-related deaths [5, 92]. A recent US-based study found an annual rate of stroke risk of 0.8% [92], lower than those in endemic countries, 1.4% [93]. Annual stroke mortality in Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy reaches 0.4% [94]. The mechanism by which they occur in approximately half of the cases is through cardioembolism in individuals with underlying cardiomyopathy [5, 95].
The risk factors for cerebral infarcts include cardiac arrhythmias, apical aneurysms, parietal thrombosis, mural thrombosis, female gender, arterial hypertension, and left ventricular dysfunctions [5, 96]. However, stroke may affect patients with no cardiomyopathy [97].
Other secondary mechanisms related to microvascular changes (e.g., endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis, and autoimmunity) account for the remaining cases without heart disease [98, 99]. In Chagas-related stroke, the MCA territory is the most frequent site for embolism in 71–87% of cases, although patients can present with cerebral infarcts to virtually any structure [99, 100]. Recurrence is common, as 20% of chagasic patients with cerebral infarcts have a history of previous stroke [100].
Neurocognitive and Psychiatric Disease
There is limited data on cognitive function in CD, and data is conflicting. A study in 1994 by Mangone et al. reported that individuals with T. cruzi infection score lower Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) compared to those without it, perhaps mediated by the development of cardiomyopathy, treatment regimen, chronic inflammation, or trypanosome-induced immune dysregulation—yet a definitive causal relationship has not been established [101, 102]. Additionally, these findings have not been reproducible, as even patients with white matter lesions with CD have shown no cognitive dysfunction in retrospective analyses [5, 62, 64, 103]. Alteration in behavior and the sleep-wake cycle has been reported among rodents infected with T. cruzi but not in humans [104]. Psychiatric illness has been suggested following CD, but there is no formal causal relationship [29, 101]. Electroencephalogram changes are unspecific in chronic CD [105].
Other
Retinitis was reported in a patient with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with sudden onset blurred vision and pain in his left eye. The diagnosis was made through pan-organism PCR (16S, ITS, and 28S) of riboso-mal DNA in the vitreous biopsy [106••]. His serology and blood PCR were positive for T. cruzi. In animal models, the cornea has been suggested as a parasite reservoir [107].
Peripheral and Autonomic Nervous System Involvement
Autonomic Neuropathy and Gastrointestinal Involvement
Destruction of the esophageal and colonic myenteric plexus is responsible for the digestive disorders associated with CD [108]. The mechanism is due to the denervation of ganglion cells and autonomic dysregulation, probably from amastigote invasion and trypanosome-induced immune imbalance, that results in reduced peristalsis and sphincter dysfunction [109], and thus the organs suffer severe dilation [110]. In patients with cardiomyopathy, parasympathetic dysregulation has been proposed as a mechanism for developing cardiac arrhythmias, yet these findings have not been reproducible [83, 109]. Gastrointestinal involvement is less common than heart disease and is seen mainly in patients from the Southern Cone of South America [111]. Lower urinary tract dysfunction can also be seen in patients with CD [112].
Peripheral Neuropathy
Chagas-related polyneuropathy is rare (up to 10% of cases), and the mechanism is not well-understood. It can be due to the disease itself (chronic phase sensory-motor neuritis) or due may occur as a side effect from antiprotozoal therapy (benznidazole or nifurtimox) at any point of the disease treatment [4, 5, 68, 113].
Diagnostic Methods
A high index of suspicion is critical for diagnosing CNS CD in patients with risk factors (e.g., country of origin, country of residence, travel history, immunosuppression, mother’s country of origin).
The diagnosis of central nervous system CD can be made through the direct detection of the parasite in the CSF [84, 114], the presence of amastigotes in histopathology [83, 114], CSF parasitic culture (Novy-MacNeal-Nicolle Parasitic Medium, can take 2 to 4 weeks) [115, 116], molecular techniques in CSF, tissue, and preservation fluid [117–119]. In addition, serum serologic studies with the appropriate clinical picture [85, 120], circulating trypomastigotes in peripheral blood through the Strouth method in patients with neurological manifestations [118], or rising parasite numbers by quantitative PCR in peripheral blood in patients with CNS signs and symptoms should raise the possibility of CNS CD. The CSF profile may be normal or associated with lymphocyte pleocytosis, hyper-proteinorraquia, and low glucose [113].
Direct Visualization
The CSF sample should be evaluated for the presence of trypomastigotes with the use of Giemsa stain; centrifugation enhances the sensitivity of the test (10 min, 3000 rpm) (Fig. 1) [121, 122]. In a case series that included 15 people coinfected with HIV and T. cruzi with clinical meningoencephalitis, trypomastigotes were visualized in the CSF in 85% of cases [123, 124].
Fig. 1.

Giemsa stain (100×) of CSF fluid displaying a T. cruzi try-pomastigote (arrow)
Molecular Methods
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) against T cruzi satellite DNA can be used in the CSF and peripheral blood to diagnose CD. These techniques present high sensitivity for DNA parasite detection during reactivation and chronic-phase patients; in addition to that, their use can be applied to monitor response to therapy [118]. Quantitative PCR can simultaneously be applied to tissue samples and the preservation fluid (PF) of the samples [117, 123]. Paraffin-embedded samples can be deparaffinized for PCR testing [119, 125]. It is relevant to mention that a negative PCR in the tissue does not rule out CD [125]. Another technique that can be used in brain tissue samples is next-generation sequencing of 28S rRNA gene. The advantage of this technique is the ability to identify one of many potential pathogens with a single test, which is ideal when evaluating immunocompromised individuals that could have multiple pathogens [119, 126]. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) detection in blood has been used to diagnose Chagas reactivation and acute disease, although no cases of CNS Chagas have been described using this technology [127, 128].
Histopathology
Amastigotes can be seen in the samples of brain biopsies with the presence of amastigotes in histopathologic studies with H&E and electron microscopy. Trypomastigotes can be seen in the leptomeninges. T. cruzi amastigotes in electron microscopy are characterized by a pseudo-flagellum and a prominent kinetoplast (0.5 μm).
T. cruzi trypomastigotes are characterized by an S-shape, a prominent terminal kinetoplast at the pointed posterior end, and a free flagellum at the anterior end [122]. In the acute form, encephalitis is characterized macroscopically with edema, congestion, and petechial hemorrhages or without major changes. Microscopically is multifocal encephalitis with nodules consisting of microglia, macrophages, astrocytes with amastigotes nests or amastigotes in the center of the nodules, and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate. This is accompanied by lymphomonocytic meningitis [123••]. In some patients, these changes can regress.
In reactivation, the nodular lesions can be seen with a necrotized center surrounded by a white halo, congested leptomeninges, and purulent exudate [124]. In the microscope, areas of well-circumscribed necrosis with perilesional inflammatory component and multiple areas of gliomesen-chymal cell clusters containing T.cruzi in macrophages and glial cells, and neurons with acute degeneration, are seen in the white matter and the cortex. Perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates with hemorrhages, mixed glial proliferation, and white matter macrophage infiltration are noted [125]. It is important to mention that amastigotes are not seen within nerve cells [126]
Serology
Serologic studies based on enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) and immunofluorescent antibody detection (IFA) for whole parasite lysate and recombinant antigens are the diagnostic method of choice for chronic CD. However, it is not specific for CNS Chagas disease, and individual assays lack sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, two serologic studies based on different techniques or antigens are necessary for the diagnosis [129]. Another limitation is the variability of these assays based on geographical location [130, 131]. Similar to other neurological infections with a reactivation, positive serology is suggestive. Still, its absence cannot rule out infection as patients may not mount a sufficient humoral response to seroconvert [129].
Imaging
Computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) can characterize CD CNS involvement.
In MR, chagomas can present as single or multiple, ring-enhancing or non-enhancing, with or without mass-effect lesions involving numerous areas of the brain (usually supratentorial), cerebellum, and spinal cord which can be seen, similar to the ones noted in patients with toxoplasmosis and CNS lymphoma [85, 114, 132]. These lesions on T1-WI are usually hypointense. On T2-WI and FLAIR, the lesions have variable signal intensity [132]. MR of chagasic encephalitis may show scattered T2-hypertense lesions, predominantly in the supratentorial white matter [133]. Another finding seen is diffuse brain atrophy [133]. In a recent case series of four patients, focal cerebral lesions with hypointensity on T2-WI were described as “bunch of açai berries appearance.” In the post-gadolinium T1-WI, punctate enhancement is seen. Açai is a fruit involved in the oral transmission of T. cruzi [134••].
Treatment
Benznidazole and nifurtimox are the current treatment for CD. Due to the side effect profile, benznidazole is preferred. Both drugs are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved only for children. Treatment of CNS Chagas reactivation in PWH and transplant recipients involves benznidazole at a dosage of 5 mg per kilogram daily, divided into two doses, for a duration of 60 days, which can be extended to 90 days in some instances. An alternative treatment option is nifurtimox, administered at 10 mg per kilogram daily, divided into three doses, for 90 days [40, 81, 113]. In the case of transplant recipients, multiple treatments may be necessary for more than one episode of Chagas reactivation [135]. If benznidazole cannot be tolerated, the patients are changed to nifurtimox [136].
A study measuring the concentrations of benznidazole in the CSF of 6 PWH with meningoencephalitis due to CD noted that only 3 patients had detectable drug levels in the CSF, all under 1 μg/ml suggesting that the usual benznidazole doses may be suboptimal in HIV-positive patients with T. cruzi meningoencephalitis and highlighting the potential for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in CD with CNS manifestations [136]. A good example is a case report of a renal transplant with CNS Chagas, where the dose was increased from 5 mg/kg/day for 60 days to 15mg/kg/day for 90 days with periodic TDM in blood and CSF, with positive results. Regarding secondary prophylaxis, there is a case report that used benznidazole 5mg/kg three times per week in a PWH for 2 years until immune reconstitution [113], although there is no standardized prophylaxis duration. Nifurtimox has also been proven to penetrate the CNS [136, 137]. In PWH, antiretroviral therapy must be initiated promptly, although no ideal time has been described or recommended [132]. The potential emergence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) poses a significant concern, particularly among PWH with CNS lesions receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, the documentation of IRIS cases specifically associated with CNS Chagas disease after initiating ART remains limited and controversial [43, 87]. In one reported case, a patient developed erythema nodosum following the initiation of ART [138]. In a study involving 235 HIV patients in Buenos Aires, one individual developed a chagoma after starting ART, which was attributed to IRIS [139]. Coinfection is not considered a contraindication for initiating ART [43].
There is no standard for primary prophylaxis for CD in HIV patients. Some experts recommend treating with benznidazole or nifurtimox in PWH with two T. cruzi positive serologic testing and without Chagas cardiomyopathy [121, 140]. In the case of transplant patients, the Brazilian government recommends prophylactic treatment of liver transplant patients with donors positive for T. cruzi [141]. In the USA, qPCR in peripheral blood and blood smears are done in recipients positive for T. cruzi and recipients of organ donors positive for T. cruzi to determine preemptive anti-trypanosomal therapy [81]. The acute phase treatment of ischemic stroke in chagasic patients does not differ from other stroke etiologies. Successful thrombolytic therapy has been reported in these patients [5, 142], but long-term sequelae may persist depending on the extent of structural damage.
For the follow-up of these patients, the clinical evolution, together with periodic qPCR of the CSF and peripheral blood combined with imaging, is useful [40, 113, 116, 122]. However, other approaches are being developed, like loop-mediated isothermal amplification of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA for point-of-care follow-up in blood and CSF samples [143].
Conclusions
We should try to elucidate the immunologic effector mechanisms responsible for reactivation in cases of HIV–T. cruzi coinfection or immunosuppressed transplant patients. There is a need to standardize molecular methods to diagnose this condition. Further investigation of NGS as a diagnostic tool may prove helpful in the clinical management of this disease. CNS benznidazole pharmacokinetics studies could contribute to the consensus for an ideal dose schedule in CNS Chagas. Globalization, migration, and global warming will continue to change the epidemiology of this disease. Early recognition, prevention efforts, and screening [144] are pivotal to preventing Chagas-related neurological complications.
Footnotes
Ethical Approval Not applicable. No ethical approval was required for this study as it did not involve human or animal subjects.
Competing Interests The authors declare no competing interests.
Data Availability
All articles used for this study are publicly available in PubMed.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:
• Of importance
•• Of major importance
- 1.Irish A, Whitman JD, Clark EH, Marcus R, Bern C. Updated estimates and mapping for prevalence of Chagas disease among adults. United States Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28:1313–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chagas disease [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.paho.org/en/topics/chagas-disease
- 3.Chagas disease (also known as American trypanosomiasis) [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chagas-disease-(american-trypanosomiasis)
- 4.Córdova E, Maiolo E, Corti M, Orduña T. Neurological manifestations of Chagas’ disease. Neurol Res. 2010;32:238–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Py MO. Neurologic manifestations of Chagas disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2011;11:536–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Carod-Artal FJ, Vargas AP, Horan TA, Nunes LGN. Chagasic cardiomyopathy is independently associated with ischemic stroke in Chagas disease. Stroke. 2005;36:965–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Useche Y, Pérez AR, de Meis J, Bonomo A, Savino W. Central nervous system commitment in Chagas disease. Front Immunol. 2022;13:975106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Da-Mata JR, Camargos MR, Chiari E, Machado CR. Trypanosoma cruzi infection and the rat central nervous system: proliferation of parasites in astrocytes and the brain reaction to parasitism. Brain Res Bull. 2000;53:153–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Silva LS, Pinheiro AS, Teixeira DE, Silva-Aguiar RP, Peru-chetti DB, Scharfstein J, et al. Kinins released by erythrocytic stages of Plasmodium falciparum enhance adhesion of infected erythrocytes to endothelial cells and increase blood brain barrier permeability via activation of bradykinin receptors. Front Med (Lausanne) [Internet]. 2019;6. Available from: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Caradonna K, PereiraPerrin M. Preferential brain homing following intranasal administration of Trypanosoma cruzi. Infect Immun. 2009;77:1349–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Simioli F, Sánchez-Cunto M, Velázquez E, Lloveras S, Orduna T. Chagas disease in the central nervous system in patient infected with HTV: diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Rev Chil Infectol. 2017;34:62–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Silva AA, Roffe E, Marino AP, dos Santos PV, Quirico-Santos T, Paiva CN, et al. Chagas’ disease encephalitis: intense CD8+ lymphocytic infiltrate is restricted to the acute phase, but is not related to the presence of Trypanosoma cruzi antigens. Clin Immunol. 1999;92:56–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Roffê E, Silva AA, Marino APMP, dos Santos PVA, Lannes-Vieira J. Essential role of VLA-4/VCAM-1 pathway in the establishment of CD8+ T-cell-mediated Trypanosoma cruzi-elicited meningoencephalitis. J Neuroimmunol. 2003;142:17–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Baldissera MD, Souza CF, Carmo GM, Monteiro SG, Mendes RE, Stefani LM, et al. Relation between acetylcholinesterase and Na+, K+-ATPase activities with impaired memory of mice experimentally infected by Trypanosoma cruzi. Microb Pathog. 2017;111:75–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chuenkova MV, PereiraPerrin M. Chagas’ disease parasite promotes neuron survival and differentiation through TrkA nerve growth factor receptor. J Neurochem. 2004;91:385–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Weinkauf C, PereiraPerrin M. Trypanosoma cruzipromotes neuronal and glial cell survival through the neurotrophic receptor TrkC. Infect Immun. 2009;77:1368–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.de Melo-Jorge M, PereiraPerrin M. The Chagas’ disease parasite Trypanosoma cruzi exploits nerve growth factor receptor TrkA to infect mammalian hosts. Cell Host Microbe. 2007;1:251–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chuenkova MV, Pereira MA. The T. cruzi trans-sialidase induces PC 12 cell differentiation via MAPK/ERK pathway. Neuroreport. 2001;12:3715–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.de Assis GMP, Donato MF, Milagre MM, Béla SR, Ricci MF, Batista LA, et al. Participation of central muscarinic receptors on the nervous form of Chagas disease in mice infected via intracerebroventricular with Colombian Trypanosoma cruzi strain. Pathogens [Internet]. 2021;10. Available from: 10.3390/pathogensl0020121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Silva RR, Mariante RM, Silva AA, dos Santos ALB, Roffê E, Santiago H, et al. Interferon-gamma promotes infection of astrocytes by Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0118600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Silva AA, Silva RR, Gibaldi D, Mariante RM, dos Santos JB, Pereira IR, et al. Priming astrocytes with TNF enhances their susceptibility to Trypanosoma cruzi infection and creates a self-sustaining inflammatory milieu. J Neuroinflammation [Internet]. 2017;14. Available from: 10.1186/S12974-017-0952-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Barreto-de-Albuquerque J, Silva-dos-Santos D, Pérez AR, Berbert LR, de Santana-van-Vliet E, Farias-de-Oliveira DA, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi infection through the oral route promotes a severe infection in mice: new disease form from an old infection? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Scharfstein J, Schmitz V, Morandi V, Capella M, Paula A, Lima CA. Host cell invasion by Trypanosoma cruzi is potentiated by activation of bradykinin b 2 receptors. New York, NY, USA: Rockefeller University Press; 2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Coates BM, Sullivan DP, Makanji MY, Du NY, Olson CL, Muller WA, et al. Endothelial transmigration by Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS One. 2013;8:e81187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.González FB, Villar SR, Pacini MF, Bottasso OA, Pérez AR. Immune-neuroendocrine and metabolic disorders in human and experimental T. cruzi infection: new clues for understanding Chagas disease pathology. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol basis Dis. 2020; 1866:165642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pacheco AL, Vicentini G, Matteucci KC, Ribeiro RR, Weinlich R, Bortoluci KR. The impairment in the NLRP3-induced NO secretion renders astrocytes highly permissive to T. cruzi replication. J Leukoc Biol. 2019;106:201–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Iadecola C, Anrather J. The immunology of stroke: from mechanisms to translation. Nat Med. 2011;17:796–808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Carod-Artal FJ. Trypanosomiasis, cardiomyopathy and the risk of ischemic stroke. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010;8:717–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Duarte-Silva E, Maes M, Macedo D, Savino W, Peixoto CA. Shared neuroimmune and oxidative pathways underpinning Chagas disease and major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2020;10:419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gibb J, Hayley S, Poulter MO, Anisman H. Effects of stressors and immune activating agents on peripheral and central cytokines in mouse strains that differ in stressor responsivity. Brain Behav Immun. 2011;25:468–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.de Almeida-Leite CM, Silva ICC, Galvão LMDC, Arantes RME. Sympathetic glial cells and macrophages develop different responses to Trypanosoma cruzi infection or lipopolysaccharide stimulation. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014;109:459–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Borghi SM, Fattori V, Carvalho TT, Tatakihara VLH, Zaninelli TH, Pinho-Ribeiro FA, et al. Experimental trypanosoma cruzi infection induces pain in mice dependent on early spinal cord glial cells and NFkB activation and cytokine production. Front Immunol. 2020;11:539086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vilar-Pereira G, Castaño Barrios L, da Silva AA, Martins Batista A, Resende Pereira I, Cruz Moreira O, et al. Memory impairment in chronic experimental Chagas disease: benznidazole therapy reversed cognitive deficit in association with reduction of parasite load and oxidative stress in the nervous tissue. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0244710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Niborski LL, Potenza M, Chirivi RGS, Simonetti L, Ossowski MS, Grippo V, et al. Recombinant antibody against Trypanosoma cruzi from patients with chronic Chagas heart disease recognizes mammalian nervous system. EBioMedicine. 2021;63:103206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cordova E, Boschi A, Ambrosioni J, Cudos C, Corti M. Reactivation of Chagas disease with central nervous system involvement in HIV-infected patients in Argentina, 1992–2007. Int J Infect Dis. 2008;12:587–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Benchetrit A, Andreani G, Avila MM, Rossi D, De Rissio AM, Weissenbacher M, et al. High HIV–Trypanosoma cruzi coinfection levels in vulnerable populations in Buenos Aires, Argentina. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2017;33:330–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stauffert D, Silveira MFD, Mesenburg MA, Manta AB, Dutra ADS, Bicca GLDO, et al. Prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi/HTV coinfection in southern Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis. 2017;21:180–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Reimer-McAtee MJ, Mejia C, Clark T, Terle J, Pajuelo MJ, Cabeza J, et al. HIV and Chagas disease: an evaluation of the use of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction to measure levels of Trypanosoma cruzi parasitemia in HIV patients in Cochabamba. Bolivia Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;105:643–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gomez CA, Banaei N. Trypanosoma cruzi reactivation in the brain. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yasukawa K, Patel SM, Flash CA, Stager CE, Goodman JC, Woc-Colbum L. Trypanosoma cruzi meningoencephalitis in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;91:84–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pittella JE. Central nervous system involvement in Chagas’ disease. An updating. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1993;35:111–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pérez-Molina JA, Rodríguez-Guardado A, Soriano A, Pinazo M-J, Carrilero B, García-Rodríguez M, et al. Guidelines on the treatment of chronic coinfection byTrypanosoma cruziand HIV outside endemic areas. HIV Clin Trials. 2011;12:287–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Clark EH, Bern C. Chagas disease in people with HIV: a narrative review. Trap Med Infect Dis. 2021;6:198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gattoni CM, Aleixo IF, de Araujo MF, Teixeira VDPA, Rodrigues DBR, de Lima Pereira SA. Chagas disease reactivation in HIV-coinfected patients: histopathological aspects. Immunobiology. 2015;220:656–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sartori AMC, Caiaffa-Filho HH, Bezerra RC, do S Guilherme C, Lopes MH, Shikanai-Yasuda MA. Exacerbation of HIV viral load simultaneous with asymptomatic reactivation of chronic Chagas’ disease. Am I Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67:521–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hoz L, Morris MI. Tissue and blood protozoa including toxoplasmosis, Chagas disease, leishmaniasis, babesia, acanthamoeba, balamuthia, and naegleria in solid organ transplant recipients- Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transpl. 2019;33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cicora F, Escurra V, Bibolini J, Petroni J, González I, Roberti J. Cerebral trypanosomiasis in a renal transplant recipient. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16:813–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Montero M, Mir M, Sulleiro E, Avalos Esquivel JL, García López E, Molina-Morant D, et al. High-dose benznidazole in a 62-year-old Bolivian kidney transplant recipient with Chagas central nervous system involvement. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;78:103–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Camargos S, Vieira Moreira M d C, Meneses Cury Portela DM, Imperes Lira JP, Santos Modesto FV, Marques Miranda Menezes G, et al. CNS chagoma. Neurology. 2017;88:605–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Marchiori PE, Alexandre PL, Britto N, Patzina RA, Fiorelli AA, Lucato LT, et al. Late reactivation of Chagas’ disease presenting in a recipient as an expansive mass lesion in the brain after heart transplantation of chagasic myocardiopathy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007;26:1091–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shakhtour O, Aberra T, Ahmad H, Saxena A, Isaac I, Meda N, et al. Case report: a case of post-transplant chagas reactivation after negative Trypanosoma cruzi testing. Am J Trop Med Hyg [Internet]. 2023; Available from: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cohen V, Ceballos V, Rodríguez N, González C, Marciano B, Dackiewicz N, et al. Chagas’ disease as a cause of cerebral mass in a patient with lymphoblastic leukemia in remission. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2010;108:134–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rojas JD, Pereira M, Martínez B, Gómez JC, Cuervo SI. Chagas disease reactivation after autologous stem cell transplant. Case report and literature review. Biomedica. 2022;42:224–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Fernandes HJ, Barbosa LOF, Machado TS, Campos JPR, Moura AS. Meningoencephalitis caused by reactivation of chagas disease in patient without known immunosuppression. Am I Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96:292–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Romero HR, Rojas N, Barrios P. Medicina tropical y enfermades del viajero (Tomo II). 2013.
- 56.Olivo Freites C, Sy H, Gharamti A, Higuita NIA, Franco-Paredes C, Suárez JA, et al. Chronic Chagas disease-the potential role of reinfections in cardiomyopathy pathogenesis. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2022;19:279–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.de Noya BA, Díaz-Bello Z, Colmenares C, Ruiz-Guevara R, Mauriello L, Muñoz-Calderón A, et al. Update on oral Chagas disease outbreaks in Venezuela: epidemiological, clinical and diagnostic approaches. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015;110:377–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rassi A, de Rezende JM, Luquetti AO, Rassi A Jr. Clinical phases and forms of Chagas disease. American Trypanosomiasis Chagas Disease. Elsevier. 2017:653–86. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis). World Health Organization. World Health Organization; 2023. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Coura JR. Chagas disease: what is known and what is needed--a background article. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102(Suppl 1):113–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pinto Dias JC. Acute Chagas’ Disease. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1984;79:85–91. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Berkowitz AL, Raibagkar P, Pritt BS, Mateen FJ. Neurologic manifestations of the neglected tropical diseases. J Neurol Sci. 2015;349:20–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Alarcón de Noya B, Díaz-Bello Z, Colmenares C, Ruiz-Guevara R, Mauriello L, Zavala-Jaspe R, et al. Large urban out-break of orally acquired acute Chagas disease at a school in Caracas, Venezuela. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:1308–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Finsterer J, Auer H. Parasitoses of the human central nervous system. J Helminthol. 2013;87:257–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bombeiro AL, Gonsalves LA, Penha-Gonçalves C, Marinho CRF, D’Império Lima MR, Chadi G, et al. IL-12p40 deficiency leads to uncontrolled Trypanosoma cruzi dissemination in the spinal cord resulting in neuronal death and motor dysfunction. PLoS One. 2012;7:e49022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bale JF Jr. Fetal infections and brain development. Clin Perinatal. 2009;36:639–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Moncayo A, Ortiz Yanine MI. An update on Chagas disease (human American trypanosomiasis). Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2006;100:663–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Pérez-Molina JA. Management of Trypanosoma cruzi coinfection in HIV-positive individuals outside endemic areas. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2014;27:9–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chadalawada S, Sillau S, Archuleta S, Mundo W, Bandali M, Parra-Henao G, et al. Risk of chronic cardiomyopathy among patients with the acute phase or indeterminate form of Chagas disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2015072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Amin DR, Behan S, Pengshung M, Khanna A, Tzou WS, Mantini N, et al. Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia as the presenting sign of Chagas’ cardiomyopathy in a low prevalence setting, diagnosis and management challenges. A case report Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2022;9:204993612211417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Antunes ACM, Cecchini FMDL, Bolli FVB, Oliveira PPD, Reboucas RG, Monte TL, et al. Cerebral trypanosomiasis and AIDS. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2002;60:730–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Chalela CM, Peña AM, Roa AM, Reyes DL, Rueda JP, Salazar LA, et al. Reactivation of Chagas disease after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop [Internet]. 2021;54. Available from: 10.1590/0037-8682-0143-2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.••.Fernández ML, Marson ME, Mastrantonio GE, Corti MA, Fleitas U, Lloveras SC, et al. Benznidazole in cerebrospinal fluid: a case series of chagas disease meningoencephalitis in HIV-positive patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021:65. 10.1128/AAC.01922-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This case series describe the role of therapeutic drug monitoring for benznidazole in patients with central nervous system T.cruzi infection.
- 74.Iliovich E, López R, Kum M, Uzandizaga G. Spontaneous chagasic peritonitis in a patient with AIDS. Medicina (B Aires). 1998;58:507–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lynn MK, Rodriguez Aquino MS, Cornejo Rivas PM, Kanyangarara M, Self SCW, Campbell BA, et al. Chagas disease maternal seroprevalence and maternal–fetal health outcomes in a parturition cohort in Western El Salvador. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023;8:233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ringer A, Ruffino JP, Leiva R, Cuadranti N, Argento MC, Martínez MF, et al. Chagas disease reactivation in rheumatologic patients: association with immunosuppressive therapy and humoral response. Clin Rheumatol. 2021;40:2955–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kohl S, Pickering LK, Frankel LS, Yaeger RG. Reactivation of Chagas’ disease during therapy of acute lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer. 1982;50:827–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Salomão JFM. Focus session: parasitic diseases of the central nervous system—an introduction. Childs Nerv Syst [Internet]. 2022; 10.1007/s00381-022-05755-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Pittella JEH. Central nervous system involvement in Chagas disease: a hundred-year-old history. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103:973–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Cohen JE, Tsai EC, Ginsberg HJ, Godes J. Pseudotumoral chagasic meningoencephalitis as the first manifestation of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Surg Neurol. 1998;49:324–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.La Hoz RM, Morris MI. Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation. Tissue and blood protozoa including toxoplasmosis, Chagas disease, leishmaniasis, Babesia, Acanthamoeba, Balamuthia, and Naegleria in solid organ transplant recipients- Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transpl. 2019;33:el3546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sartori AM, Lopes MH, Caramelli B, Duarte MI, Pinto PL, Neto V, et al. Simultaneous occurrence of acute myocarditis and reactivated Chagas’ disease in a patient with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21:1297–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Rossi Spadafora MS, Céspedes G, Romero S, Fuentes I, Boada-Sucre AA, Cañavate C, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi necrotizing meningoencephalitis in a Venezuelan HIV+-AIDS patient: pathological diagnosis confirmed by PCR using formalin-fixed- and paraffin-embedded-tissues. Anal Cell Pathol. 2014;2014:124795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Kaushal M, Shabani S, Cochran EJ, Samra H, Zwagerman NT. Cerebral trypanosomiasis in an immunocompromised patient: case report and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2019;129:225–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Pagano MA, Segura MJ, Di Lorenzo GA, Garau ML, Molina HA, Cahn P, et al. Cerebral tumor-like American trypanosomiasis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:403–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Camargos S, Moreira MDCV, Portela DMMC, Lira JPI, Modesto FVS, Menezes GMM, Moreira DR.CNS chagoma: reactivation in an immunosuppressed patient. Neurology. 2017;88:605–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Guidetto B, Tatta M, Latini V, Gonzales M, Riarte A, Tavella S, et al. HIV and Chagas disease coinfection, a tractable disease? Open Forum Infect Dis [Internet]. 2019;6. 10.1093/ofid/ofz307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Chimelli L A morphological approach to the diagnosis of protozoal infections of the central nervous system. Pathol Res Int. 2011;2011:290853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Corti M, Trione N, Corbera K, Vivas C. Chagas’ disease: another cause of cerebral mass occurring in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2000;18:194–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Ferreira MS, Nishioka SDA, Silvestre MTA, Borges AS, Nunes-Araujo FRF, Rocha A. Reactivation of Chagas’ disease in patients with AIDS: report of three new cases and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:1397–400. 10.1086/516130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sinagra A, Luna C, Iriarte A. AIDS and Chagas’ disease. Medicina (Buenos Aires). 1999;59:22–3. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Henao-Martínez AF, Olivo-Freites C, Agudelo Higuita NI, Ferraz C, Franco-Paredes C, Tuells J, Woc-Colburn L, Villalpando-Carrión S, Chastain DB, Rassi A Jr. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of chagas disease in the United States: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023; In Press [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Moreira HT, Volpe GJ, Mesquita GM, Braggion-Santos MF, Pazin-Filho A, Marin-Neto JA, et al. Association of left ventricular abnormalities with incident cerebrovascular events and sources of thromboembolism in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022;24:52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Chadalawada S, Rassi A Jr, Samara O, Monzon A, Gudapati D, Vargas Barahona L, et al. Mortality risk in chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ESC Heart Fail. 2021;8:5466–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Carod-Artal FJ, Horan TA, Vargas AP, Ribeiro LS, Mamare EM. Cardioembolic stroke and ischemic small bowel infarction in a Chagas’ disease patient. Eur J Neurol. 2007;14:e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Nunes MCP, Barbosa MM, Ribeiro ALP, Barbosa FBL, Rocha MOC. Ischemic cerebrovascular events in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy: a prospective follow-up study. J Neurol Sci. 2009;278:96–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Lage TAR, Tupinambás JT, Pádua LBD, Ferreira MDO, Ferreira AC, Teixeira AL, et al. Stroke in Chagas disease: from pathophysiology to clinical practice. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2022;55 10.1590/0037-8682-0575-2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Carod-Artal FJ, Vargas AP, Melo M, Horan TA. American trypanosomiasis (Chagas’ disease): an unrecognised cause of stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74:516–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Guedes PMM, Andrade CMD, Nunes DF, de Sena Pereira N, Queiroga TBD, Machado-Coelho GLL, et al. Inflammation enhances the risks of stroke and death in chronic Chagas disease patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Carod-Artal FJ, Gascon J. Chagas disease and stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:533–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Lannes-Vieira J, Vilar-Pereira G, Barrios LC, Silva AA. Anxiety, depression, and memory loss in Chagas disease: a puzzle far beyond neuroinflammation to be unpicked and solved. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2023;118:e220287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Oliveira-Filho J, Vieira-de-Melo RM, Reis PSO, Lacerda AM, Neville IS, Cincura C, et al. Chagas disease is independently associated with brain atrophy. J Neurol. 2009;256:1363–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Mangone CA, Sica RE, Pereyra S, Genovese O, Segura E, Riarte A, et al. Cognitive impairment in human chronic Chagas’ disease. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1994;52:200–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Arankowsky-Sandoval G, Mut-Martín M, Solís-Rodríguez F, Góngora-Alfaro JL, Barrera-Pérez M. Sleep and memory deficits in the rat produced by experimental infection with Trypanosoma cruzi. Neurosci Lett. 2001;306:65–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Wackermann PV, Fernandes RMF, Elias J Jr, Dos Santos AC, Marques W Jr, Barreira AA. Involvement of the central nervous system in the chronic form of Chagas’ disease. J Neurol Sci. 2008;269:152–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.••.Conrady CD, Hanson KE, Mehra S, Carey A, Larochelle M, Shakoor A. The first case of Trypanosoma cruzi–associated retinitis in an immunocompromised host diagnosed with pan-organism polymerase chain reaction. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:141–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This article describes for the first time the involvement of the optic nerve due to T.cruzi.
- 107.Herrera L, Martínez C, Carrasco H, Jansen AM, Urdaneta-Morales S. Cornea as a tissue reservoir of Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasitol Res. 2007;100:1395–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Bruzzone R, Dubois-Dalcq M, Grau GE, Griffin DE, Kris-tensson K. Infectious diseases of the nervous system and their impact in developing countries. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:el000199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.da Silveira ABM, Lemos EM, Adad SJ, Correa-Oliveira R, Furness JB, D’Avila RD. Megacolon in Chagas disease: a study of inflammatory cells, enteric nerves, and glial cells. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:1256–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Rezende Filho J, Chaves de Oliveira E. Management of chronic digestive involvement in patients with Chagas disease in endemic and non-endemic countries: challenges and limitations. Chagas Disease. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 163–71. [Google Scholar]
- 111.de Oliveira ÊC, da Silveira ABM, Luquetti AO. Gastrointestinal Chagas disease. Chagas Disease. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 243–64. [Google Scholar]
- 112.Bey E, Paucara Condori MB, Gaget O, Solano P, Revollo S, Saussine C, et al. Lower urinary tract dysfunction in chronic Chagas disease: clinical and urodynamic presentation. World J Urol. 2019;37:1395–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Diazgranados CA, Saavedra-Trujillo CH, Mantilla M, Valderrama SL, Alquichire C, Franco-Paredes C. Chagasic encephalitis in HIV patients: common presentation of an evolving epidemiological and clinical association. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:324–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Lury KM, Castillo M. Chagas’ disease involving the brain and spinal cord: MRI findings. AIR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:550–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Hoff R, Teixeira RS, Carvalho IS, Mott KE. Trypanosoma cruzi in the cerebrospinal fluid during the acute stage of Chagas’ disease. N Engl I Med. 1978;298:604–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Bern C, Kjos S, Yabsley MI, Montgomery SP. Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas’ disease in the United States. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24:655–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Lages-Silva E, Ramirez LE, Silva-Vergara ML, Chiari E. Chagasic meningoencephalitis in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: diagnosis, follow-up, and genetic characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:118–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Lopez-Albizu C, Bravo MP, Pico M, Fernandez ML. Case report of Chagas disease reactivation: new diagnosis tool by direct microscopic observation of biopsy specimen and its preservation fluid. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2020;54:e20200326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Multani A, Meer A, Smith DS, Kheraj MN, Plowey ED, Blackburn BG. Diagnosis of Chagasic encephalitis by sequencing of 28S rRNA gene. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:1370–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Spina-França A, Livramento JA, Machado LR, Yasuda N. Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid: a search using complement fixation and immunofluorescence reactions. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1988;46:374–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Ferreira MS, Borges AS. Some aspects of protozoan infections in immunocompromised patients: a review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2002;97:443–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Lazo I, Meneses AC, Rocha A, Ferreira MS, Marquez IO, Chapadeiro E, et al. Chagasic meningoencephalitis in the immunodeficient. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1998;56:93–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.••.Fernandez ML, Albizu CL, Nicita D, Besuschio S, Giomi C, Biondi ML, et al. Molecular characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi reactivation and follow-up in a case series of people with HIV. Open Forum. Infect Dis Ther 2023;10:ofad357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study applies qPCR of T.cruzi in the CSF and blood for diagnosis and monitoring of CNS disease, with positive results.
- 124.Fica A, Salinas M, jercic MI, Dabanch I, Soto A, Quintanilla S, et al. Chagas disease affecting the central nervous system in a patient with AIDS demonstrated by quantitative molecular methods. Rev Chil Infectol. 2017;34:69–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Maldonado C, Albano S, Vettorazzi L, Salomone O, Zlocowski IC, Abiega C, et al. Using polymerase chain reaction in early diagnosis of re-activated Trypanosoma cruzi infection after heart transplantation. I Heart Lung Transplant. 2004;23:1345–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Yoo TW, Mlikotic A, Comford ME, Beck CK. Concurrent cerebral american trypanosomiasis and toxoplasmosis in a patient with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:e30–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.David S, Shahandeh N, Vucicevic D, Kamath MY. Chagas reactivation during desensitization for orthotopic heart transplantation. I Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81:3178. [Google Scholar]
- 128.Hudson FP, Homer N, Epstein A, Mondy K. Acute Chagas disease manifesting as orbital cellulitis, Texas, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27:2937–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Chagas disease [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/hiv-clinical-guidelines-adult-and-adolescent-opportunistic-infections/chagas-disease?view=full
- 130.Tarleton RL, Reithinger R, Urbina IA, Kitron U, Gürtler RE. The challenges of Chagas disease— grim outlook or glimmer of hope? PLoS Med. 2007;4:e332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Verani IR, Seitz A, Gilman RH, LaFuente C, Galdos-Cardenas G, Kawai V, et al. Geographic variation in the sensitivity of recombinant antigen-based rapid tests for chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:410–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Cord M, Yampolsky C. Prolonged survival and immune reconstitution after chagasic meningoencephalitis in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2006;39:85–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Carmo RL, Alves Simao AK, Amaral LL, Inada BS, Silveira CF, Campos CM, et al. Neuroimaging of emergent and reemer-gent infections. Radiographics. 2019;39:1649–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.••.Fonseca APA, de Melo RFQ, Menezes T, Soares CMA, Rodrigues V, Alves RPM, et al. “Bunch of acai berries sign”: a new radiological sign in patients with CNS involvement in Chagas disease. Neuroradiology. 2023; 10.1007/s00234-023-03181-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; A case series describes an MRI sign called “Bunch of acai berries sign” in CNS CD, this is the first sign described in this entity.
- 135.Moreira MDCV, Renan Cunha-Melo J. Chagas disease infection reactivation after heart transplant. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020;5:106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Crespillo-Andújar C, Chamorro-Tojeiro S, Norman F, Monge-Maillo B, López-Vélez R, Pérez-Molina IA. Toxicity of nifurtimox as second-line treatment after benznidazole intolerance in patients with chronic Chagas disease: when available options fail. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:1344.el–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Jeganathan S, Sanderson L, Dogruel M, Rodgers I, Croft S, Thomas SA. The distribution of nifurtimox across the healthy and trypanosome-infected murine blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers. I Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011;336:506–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Sartori AMC, Sotto MN, Almeida Braz LM, da Cruz Oliveira O Jr, Patzina RA, Barone AA, et al. Reactivation of Chagas disease manifested by skin lesions in a patient with AIDS. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999;93:631–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Warley E, Antabak N, Desse I. Desarrollo de neoplasias e infecciones definitorias de SIDA después de iniciar la terapia antirretroviral de alta eficacia. Development of neoplasia and AIDS defining-infections after initiation of highly efficacy antirretroviral therapy. Rev Med. 2010;70:49–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Chagas disease [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 22]. Available from: https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/hiv-clinical-guidelines-adult-and-adolescent-opportunistic-infections/chagas-disease
- 141.D’Albuquerque LAC, Gonzalez AM, Filho HLVN, Copstein JLM, Larrea FIS, Mansero JMP, et al. Liver transplantation from deceased donors serologically positive for Chagas disease. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:680–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Trabuco CC, Pereira de Jesus PA, Bacellar AS, Oliveira-Filho J. Successful thrombolysis in cardioembolic stroke from Chagas disease. Neurology. 2005;64:170–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Muñoz-Calderón AA, Besuschio SA, Wong S, Fernández M, García Cáceres LJ, Giorgio P, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA for point-of-care follow-up of anti-parasitic treatment of Chagas disease. Micro-organisms. 2022;10:909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Marcus R, Henao-Martínez AF, Nolan M, Livingston E, Klotz SA, Gilman RH, et al. Recognition and screening for Chagas disease in the USA. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2021;8:204993612110460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All articles used for this study are publicly available in PubMed.
