Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 9;108(1):411. doi: 10.1007/s00253-024-13252-w

Table 2.

Changes in nutrient composition of milk during the lactation period of Tibetan goats

Group Fat (%) Protein (%) SNF (%) Solids (%) Lactose (%) Low lactose (%) Galactose (%) Casein (%)
D0 8.93 ± 0.28a 11.99 ± 0.26a 17.36 ± 0.35a 24.80 ± 0.52a 4.40 ± 0.09ab 3.30 ± 0.18a 1.32 ± 0.08a 8.68 ± 0.28a
D7 7.50 ± 0.09b 9.52 ± 0.09b 14.95 ± 0.19b 19.64 ± 0.66b 3.99 ± 0.08b 2.58 ± 0.10b 1.29 ± 0.10a 6.36 ± 0.37b
D14 6.70 ± 0.13b 5.91 ± 0.18c 12.14 ± 0.27c 18.16 ± 0.94bc 4.16 ± 0.34ab 2.46 ± 0.17b 1.01 ± 0.18a 4.31 ± 0.25c
D28 5.28 ± 0.09c 5.37 ± 0.15c 12.18 ± 0.12c 17.39 ± 0.38c 4.14 ± 0.27ab 2.15 ± 0.28b 0.26 ± 0.16b 3.56 ± 0.17c
D56 5.70 ± 0.09c 5.21 ± 0.15c 11.16 ± 0.24c 17.00 ± 0.24c 4.86 ± 0.17a 2.46 ± 0.07b 0.29 ± 0.05b 3.93 ± 0.12c
SEM 0.22 0.44 0.40 0.52 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.32
P value  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001 0.007  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001

The data in the table represents the percentage of various nutritional components in the milk. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05), and the same letters indicate that the differences between the two groups are not significant (P > 0.05)