Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 14;17(7):sfae141. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae141

Table 4:

Association between diuretic prescription and extracellular volume outcomes, restricted to patients with dialysis vintage <1 year.

Variables n (%) Pre-dialysis SBP (mmHg) Pre-dialysis DBP (mmHg) IDWG (kg) RUV (as >200 ml/24 h)
Patients, n 29 934 29 923 27 538 31 621
 Mean (SD) 143.9 (22.55) 75.14 (13.62) 2.49 (3.31)
Events, n 8382
Prevalence of outcome, % 26.5
Patient diuretic use, mean (95% CI)
 Yes 38.2 1 (0.4–1.5) −0.2 (−0.5–0.1) −0.09 (−0.18 to −0.01) 1.51 (1.41–1.61)
 No 61.8 0 (Ref.) 0 (Ref.) 0 (Ref.) 1 (Ref.)
Patient loop diuretic dose (mg/day), mean (95% CI)
 No dose 72.3 0 (Ref.) 0 (Ref.) 0 (Ref.) 1 (Ref.)
 0–≤60 7.5 1.2 (0.1–2.2) −0.3 (−0.9–0.3) −0.3 (−0.47 to −0.13) 1.5 (1.34–1.68)
 60–≤200 10.1 0.2 (−0.8–1.1) −0.7 (−1.2, -0.2) −0.11 (−0.26–0.04) 1.59 (1.43–1.76)
 >200 10.2 0.6 (−0.5–1.7) −0.4 (−1–0.2) −0.01 (−0.19–0.16) 1.59 (1.42–1.78)

Mean difference (95% CI) or odds ratio (95% CI) of each outcome shown for diuretic use (yes versus no) and loop diuretic dose (reference group: no dose). Doses of torsemide (4:1) and bumetanide (80:1) were converted to oral furosemide-equivalent doses. Linear mixed models (for SBP, DBP and IDWG) and logistic regression models (for RUV) adjusted for DOPPS phase, country, age, sex, Black race, <90 days dialysis vintage, catheter use, BMI, serum albumin, haemoglobin and 13 comorbidities.