Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 9;24:193. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02586-0

Table 2.

Comparison of the result of moderation effect evaluation by subgroup analysis

Subgroup
by cancer type
Adjusted HR* (95% CI) Adjusted HR* (95% CI)
DBIII DBDII Effect
size
DBIII DBDII Effect
size
Breast cancer In age < 50 In age ≥ 50
 Non-HT 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
 AI-only 1.31 (0.94–1.84) 1.21 (0.85–1.71) 0.04 0.89 (0.79–1.01) 0.98 (0.88–1.08) 0.05
 TAM-only 0.83 (0.69–1.01) 0.93 (0.78–1.10) 0.06 0.80 (0.68–0.94) 0.78 (0.69–0.89) 0.01
 AI + TAM 0.19 (0.01–3.03) 0.27 (0.04–1.95) 0.19 0.46 (0.23–0.92) 0.98 (0.68–1.42) 0.42
Prostate cancer Localized stage Regional stage
 Non-ADT 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
 ADT 2.27 (1.91–2.70) 1.92 (1.70–2.17) 0.09 1.80 (1.37–2.36) 2.05 (1.67–2.52) 0.07

Abbreviations: ADT: androgen deprivation therapy; AI: aromatase inhibitors; CI: confidence interval; DB: data base; DII: directly identifiable information; III: indirectly identifiable information; HR: hazard ratio; HT: hormone therapy; III: indirectly identifiable information

*Adjusted HR was computed after all covariates excluding the treatment and subgroup variables