Heterogenous cases with varied clinical outcomes
|
-
•
Varied baseline DSA quantity
-
•
Preexisting versus de novo DSA
-
•
ABMR detected via surveillance or indication biopsy
|
-
•
Plan to enroll patients with a similar risk profile as those included in pilot and early observational studies.
-
•
Balance the inclusion of patients with preexisting and de novo DSA. Adjust for whether the ABMR diagnosis was made via indication or surveillance biopsy
|
Difficult to conduct clinical trials because of low enrollment and need for prolonged follow-up
|
-
•
The time to graft loss after ABMR detection can be several years.
-
•
High risk transplants with DSA and positive crossmatch are done less often making it more difficult to enroll patients in clinical trials.
-
•
The downside of improving the homogeneity in the studied patient population is a decrease in patients who meet inclusion criteria.
-
•
Patients with chronic ABMR often not found early because these patients may be followed by non-transplant nephrologists and/or do not get surveillance DSA or biopsies
|
-
•
Develop international consortia.
-
•
To account for long follow-up, consider using reliable qualified surrogate endpoints such as slope of eGFR, and plan for long term extension studies to verify results.
-
•
Be realistic about enrollment and include centers experienced in transplantation with donor specific antibody.
-
•
Develop decentralized clinical trials and partner with local general nephrologists to enroll and identify patients who do not have long term follow-up in an academic medical center.
-
•
Consider novel clinical trial design to overcome small patient numbers
|
Lack of standardized reporting limit the ability to communicate or combine results for meta-analysis
|
|
-
•
Collaboration and development of minimum standards for reporting by major transplant groups (e.g., Banff).
-
•
Minimal standard reporting consistently followed by industry and enforced by major clinical journals
|