TABLE 2.
IENFD lateral thigh | IENFD lateral calf | CDT | WDT | MDT | MPT | TSL | VDT | Sural nerve SNAP | Sural nerve NCV | Sural/ulnar ratio | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
sNfL | |||||||||||
r | −0.15 | −0.28 | 0.05 | 0.28 | 0.12 | 0.12 | −0.03 | −0.21 | −0.43 | −0.26 | −0.17 |
p | 0.46 | 0.14 | 0.81 | 0.14 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.89 | 0.28 | 0.02* | 0.17 | 0.37 |
Note: There were no significant correlations between sNfL and the other results of SFN assessment in the patient cohort (n = 30), but there was a strong negative correlation with sural nerve SNAP.
Abbreviations: CDT, cold detection threshold; IENFD, intraepidermal nerve fiber density; MDT, mechanical detection threshold; MPT, mechanical pain threshold; NCS, nerve conduction studies; NCV, nerve conduction velocity; SFN, small fiber neuropathy; SNAP, sensory nerve action potential; sNfL, serum neurofilament light chain; TSL, thermal sensory limen; VDT, vibration disappearance threshold; WDT, warm detection threshold. *significant p value.