TABLE 7.
Transmission of A/HK/1073/99 (H9N2) among quail
Day after contact | No. infected (virus titer [log10/ml])
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Infected quaila
|
Physical contactb
|
Fecal contactc
|
Aerosol contactd
|
|||||
Trachea | Cloaca | Trachea | Cloaca | Trachea | Cloaca | Trachea | Cloaca | |
2 | 2 (2.8) | 0 (<e) | 2 (4.8) | 0 | 4 (4.8) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 2 (2.8) | 0 (<) | 2 (NTf) | 2 (<1.0) | 4 (NT) | 1 (<1.0) | 2 (4.5) | 0 |
6 | 2 (4.5) | 0 (<) | 2 (4.5) | 0 (<) | 4 (4.5) | 1 (<1.0) | 4 (2.0) | 0 |
9 | 2 (<1.0) | 0 (<) | 2 (2.0) | 2 (<1.0) | 4 (2.5) | 0 | 4 (2.0) | 3 (<1.0) |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Two quail were infected with A/HK/1073/99 (H9N2).
The two infected quail were put into a cage with two contact quail.
Four quail were put into a cage below the infected birds with the litter tray removed.
Four quail were put into a cage at the same level as the infected birds but separated by 1 ft. Airflow was from the bottom and out through top filters.
<, below the level of detection.
NT, not tested.