Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 17;2014(1):CD010320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010320.pub2

Comparison 1. Intubation with FIS versus videolaryngoscope.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Change of intubation method 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Participants with episodes of desaturation 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Bleeding during/after intubation 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Sore throat 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Successful first intubation 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6 Intubator's assessment of difficulty of intubation     Other data No numeric data