Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul;17(7):24–36.

TABLE 1.

Summary of literature review regarding demographic data, efficacy, and treatment durability of rituximab in patients with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita

DEMOGRAPHIC MECHANOBULLOUS NON-MECHANOBULLOUS TOTAL
PATIENTS, N 23 19 68
Age at onset, y
  MEAN 54 52.7 52.9
  RANGE 28-88 20-77 17-88
  NM 6 6 13
Gender, n (%)
  FEMALE 8 (47.1%) 13 (72.2%) 35 (51.5%)
  MALE 9 (52.9%) 5 (27.8%) 33 (48.5%)
  NM 6 1 0
Previous treatments, n (%)
  SYSTEMIC CORTICOSTEROIDS 5 (31.2%) 16 (94.1%) 32 (60.4%)
  DAPSONE 3 (18.8%) 6 (35.3%) 16 (30.2%)
  AZATHIOPRINE 2 (12.5%) 3 (17.6%) 9 (16.9%)
  MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL 3 (18.8%) 1 (5.9%) 9 (16.9%)
  IVIG 1 (6.2%) 0 (0%) 7 (13.2%)
  CYCLOSPORINE 4 (25.0%) 2 (11.8%) 9 (16.9%)
  COLCHICINE 2 (12.5%) 1 (5.9%) 4 (7.5%)
  OTHERS 2 (12.5%) 2 (11.8%) 8 (15.1%)
  NM 7 2 15
EBA duration until RTX infusion, months
  MEAN 82.7 23.0 51.3
  RANGE 6-240 0.5-84 0.5-240
  NM 6 4 14
Adjuvant therapy, n (%)
  SYSTEMIC CORTICOSTEROIDS 5 (31.2%) 16 (94.1%) 32 (60.4%)
  DAPSONE 3 (18.8%) 6 (35.3%) 16 (30.2%)
  AZATHIOPRINE 2 (12.5%) 3 (17.6%) 9 (16.9%)
  IVIG 3 (18.8%) 1 (5.9%) 9 (16.9%)
  COLCHICINE 1 (6.2%) 0 (0%) 7 (13.2%)
  MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL 4 (25.0%) 2 (11.8%) 9 (16.9%)
  IMMUNOADSORPTION 2 (12.5%) 1 (5.9%) 4 (7.5%)
  OTHER 2 (12.5%) 2 (11.8%) 8 (15.1%)
  NM 7 2 15
Disease control, n (%)
  YES 22 (95.6%) 16 (84.2%) 63 (92.7%)
  NO 1 (4.3%) 3 (15.8%) 5 (7.3%)
  NM 0 0 0
Clinical remission, n (%)
  YES 10 (58.8%) 11 (64.7%) 45 (73.8%)
  NO 7 (41.2%) 6 (35.3%) 16 (26.2%)
  NM 6 2 7
RTX-related side effects, n (%)
  YES 3 (30%) 4 (28.6%) 11 (28.2%)
  NO 7 (70%) 10 (71.4%) 28 (71.8%)
  NM 13 5 29
Treatment durability
  Relapse, n (%) 6 (60%) 3 (23.1%) 15 (39.5%)
  Follow-up, m 23.9 24.1 23.0
  NM 13 6 30

EBA, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita; RTX, rituximab, IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin; NM, not mentioned