Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 9;10(1):2367849. doi: 10.1080/20565623.2024.2367849

Table 2. Response surface regression: analysis of variance.

Response 1: entrapment efficacy
Source Sum of squares df Mean square F-value p-value  
Model 116.28 2 58.14 4.56 0.0391 Significant
A-Ca3(PO4) 107.65 1 107.65 8.44 0.0157  
B-Trehalose 8.63 1 8.63 0.6772 0.4297  
Residual 127.51 10 12.75      
Lack of fit 127.40 6 21.23 758.33 <0.0001 significant
Pure error 0.1120 4 0.0280      
Cor total 243.79 12        
Response 2: in vitro drug release
Source Sum of squares df Mean square F-value p-value  
Model 356.27 5 71.25 53.41 <0.0001 Significant
A-Ca3(PO4) 91.85 1 91.85 68.85 <0.0001  
B-Trehalose 169.65 1 169.65 127.17 <0.0001  
AB 12.60 1 12.60 9.45 0.0180  
A2 76.62 1 76.62 57.43 0.0001  
B2 12.10 1 12.10 9.07 0.0196  
Residual 9.34 7 1.33      
Lack of fit 9.28 3 3.09 206.18 <0.0001 Significant
Pure error 0.0600 4 0.0150      
Cor total 365.61 12        

Statistical analysis results showing the significance of factors A (Ca3(PO4)) and B (Trehalose) on Response 1 (Entrapment efficacy) and Response 2 (in vitro drug release), with p-values indicating significance levels.

Ca3(po4): Calcium phosphate; df: Degree of freedom.