Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0303573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303573

Table 4. Hill function parameters determined by fitting to matched samples of gonadal hormone/corticosteroid plasma levels.

x a y b e c h d n e p f Species Ref.
corticosterone progesterone 1 4.2 6 < 0.001 chicken [117]
corticosterone testosterone 5 3.9 4 < 0.001 chicken [117]
cortisol testosterone 28 5.2 6 < 0.001 rabbit [118]
cortisol LH 28 2.4 13 < 0.001 swine [75]
cortisol progesterone 23 8 8 < 0.001 humans [119]
cortisol testosterone 22 6 10 < 0.001 men [87]
cortisol testosterone 48 2.4 71 < 0.001 men [86]
progesterone corticosterone 32 3.5 11 < 0.001 chicken [120]
testosterone cortisol 17 7.3 6 < 0.001 rabbit [118]
testosterone cortisol 58 7.5 12 < 0.001 rabbit [118]
LH cortisol 50 7.5 6 < 0.001 rabbit [118]
LH cortisol 51 4.1 12 < 0.001 rabbit [118]
testosterone cortisol 23 1.5 71 < 0.001 male humans [86]
progesterone cortisol 64 3.8 23 < 0.001 female humans [77]
progesterone cortisol 65 8 6 < 0.001 female humans [121]
28 4.2

aInput variable, expressed as hormone plasma level standardized on a 0–100 scale

boutput variable, expressed as the input variable

cHill function’s half-saturation constant

dHill coefficient

esize of the matched sample

fcorrelation p-value

median values.