Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0305548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305548

Table 2. Comparison of estimated values of four parameters (VA, VFI, GC-IPL and pRNFL) among three groups of eyes.

NF1 noOPG
N = 109
NF1 -OPG
N = 27
S- OPG
N = 15
p
VA logMAR, mean ± SE (95CI)
N = eyes
0.08 ± 0.1
(0.05–0.1)
N = 109
0.19 ± 0.2
(0.16–0.23)
N = 27
1.02 ± 0.1
(0.87–1.16)
N = 15
<0.001
VFI, mean ± SE (95CI) %
N = eyes
95 ± 0.6
(94–97)
N = 42
88 ± 3.0
(83–94)
N = 9
47 ± 1.8
(43–50)
N = 4
<0.001
GC-IPL, mean ± SE (95CI) μm
N = eyes
85 ± 0.4
(84–85)
N = 103
70 ± 0.7
(68–70)
N = 22
62 ± 1.4
(60–65)
N = 7
<0.001
pRNFL, mean ± SE (95CI) μm
N = eyes
100 ± 0.9
(98–101)
N = 59
70 ± 2.1
(66–74)
N = 11
77 ± 2.6
(72–83)
N = 3
<0.001

VA—visual acuity, VFI- Visual Field Index, GC-IPL—ganglion cell—inner plexiform layer, pRNFL- peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer, NF1—neurofibromatosis type 1, OPG—optic pathway glioma, S—sporadic, SE—standard error, CI—confidence interval.