Skip to main content
JAAOS Global Research & Reviews logoLink to JAAOS Global Research & Reviews
. 2024 Jul 10;8(7):e24.00173. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00173

Trampolines Versus Playgrounds - A Comparative Assessment of Pediatric Fractures Sustained From Recreational Play

Ajith Malige 1, Nathan D Markiewitz 1, Raghav Badrinath 1, Keith D Baldwin 1, Lawrence Wells 1, Brendan A Williams 1,
PMCID: PMC11239173  PMID: 38996208

Abstract

Introduction:

Using the Pediatric Health Information System, this study compared the relative severity of fractures sustained from trampolines with those from other playground equipment.

Methods:

Pediatric patients were identified in the Pediatric Health Information System with trampoline-related injuries (TRIs) or playground-related injuries (PRIs) diagnosed as fractures. Adjustments were made for hospital, year of injury, sex, age, race, median household income, and rurality through propensity score weighting. Four injury-related outcome measures were examined as a proxy for injury severity.

Results:

A total of 133,232 patients met inclusion criteria. In unadjusted univariate analyses, TRIs were associated with greater odds of severe fracture and lower odds of receiving surgical treatment (OR = 0.954) compared with PRIs. After adjustment, TRIs sustained in late childhood and adolescence were more likely to receive surgical management (OR = 1.092 and OR = 1.192, respectively) while TRIs sustained in younger children were less likely (OR = 0.607) than PRIs.

Discussion:

Youths in late childhood and adolescence are at increased odds of undergoing surgical management after trampoline fractures. Beyond underscoring the risks of trampoline play, our results highlight the importance of considering age in recreational injury epidemiology and the public health safety initiatives aimed at specific age groups.


Trampoline-related injuries (TRIs) account for almost 100,000 emergency department visits annually and represent a large portion of pediatric accidental injuries.1,2,3,4 The fracture incidence sustained on trampolines has also increased markedly, from 35 per 100,000 person-years in 2008 to 53 per 100,000 person-years in 2017.3 In response to the incidence and severity of injuries sustained from trampolines, both the American Academy of Pediatrics5 and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons6 have issued statements cautioning against their use. The effect of these public health campaigns on lasting reduction of pediatric injury burden remains unclear, especially in light of the growth of trampoline park facilities where the severity of injuries sustained appears to be substantially greater.4,7,32

Several studies have described the incidence and risk factors of trampoline injury.8,9,10,11 However, most are single-center studies where seasonal, regional, and hospital-specific factors may lead to findings that are not broadly generalizable. In addition, although TRIs have been compared with other recreational injuries in a small series,12 they have yet to be evaluated in a national, multicenter data set against a reference group. Playground-related injuries (PRIs) may serve as a reasonable and common benchmark, accounting for over 200,000 ED visits annually.13 Among these injuries, monkey bars and climbing gyms cause most PRIs, frequently resulting in extremity fractures.14,15

Among the existing studies using national databases that exist, many of the recent investigations have been conducted in other countries with different standards and policies surrounding trampoline use.16,17,18,19 Of those conducted in the United States, most have used the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System,1,7,20,21 which is useful in estimating injury occurrence but is limited in scope when examining several diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes. The Pediatric Hospital Information System (PHIS) is an administrative database providing a breadth of data regarding hospitalization, interventions, and complications and has not been previously used to examine injuries sustained from trampoline or playground use.

The primary aim of this study was to assess whether trampoline-related injuries are more at risk for needing surgical management compared with playground-related injuries. Secondary aims included identifying whether TRIs were more at risk for needing greater length of stay or more likely to have medical or surgical complications and greater administrative severity compared with playground injuries. It was hypothesized that TRI fractures would differ across all studied clinical realms and be more severe across all indicators of severity and that this effect would remain after confounding adjustment.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS). PHIS is an administrative database managed by the Children's Hospital Association that contains outpatient and inpatient encounters from over 49 not-for-profit, tertiary care pediatric hospitals in the United States. Its data are de-identified and undergo rigorous quality assurance testing on submission. The PHIS database was queried for pediatric patients (17 years old and younger) sustaining trampoline-related and playground-related orthopaedic injuries from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019. Patients were excluded if their fracture site was not the spine or appendicular skeleton (ie, skull, facial, and rib fractures) or the fracture site was not identified. Given the use of de-identified, publicly available data, this study was exempted according to our institutional review board.

We used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding to identify the fracture mechanism, which we defined as either TRI (ICD-9 E005.3 or ICD-10 Y93.44) or PRI (ICD-9 E884.0 or ICD-10 W09.X). Four different injury-related outcome variables were analyzed: length of stay in days, the presence of surgical management during that encounter (our primary outcome), the presence of medical or surgical complications, and administrative severity as defined by 3M's All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR DRGs). APR-DRGs are divided into four levels of illness: (1) minor; (2) moderate; (3) major; and (4) extreme, based on “the extent of physiologic decompensation or organ system loss of function”.22 Severity was then further dichotomized into two categories, minor (minor level) and severe (moderate, major, and extreme), given that less than half of hospitals had multiple patients with major and extreme severity scores from each mechanism (n = 24, 48%) and these small cells would make our planned mixed models unreliable.23 Although this variable was not developed solely for orthopaedic injuries, it was included, given its clinical prognostic capabilities. The following patient characteristics were also collected: year of injury, age (infancy and early childhood: 0 to 4 years old; late childhood: 5 to 12yo; and adolescence: 13 to 17yo), sex (male and female), race (Asian, Black, White, and other), fracture site (spine, shoulder or arm, elbow or forearm, wrist or hand, pelvis, hip or thigh, knee or leg, and ankle or foot), zip-code median household income in 2010 (US dollars), and zip-code rurality (urban or rural). Median income was used as a proxy for individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status, given the available variables in the database, and summarized as quintiles to allow for nonlinearity.

Statistical Analyses

Limited missing data were observed in sex (n = 16, 0.01%), median income (n = 3638, 2.7%), and rurality (n = 3638, 2.7%), so these could be justifiably handled using listwise deletion.24 Descriptive statistics were first calculated and reported as either medians with interquartile ranges or the number of participants and percentages of the sample. The unadjusted or baseline models were then estimated. The unadjusted analysis consisted of generalized linear mixed models for severity, surgical management, and complications, with mechanism as a fixed effect and hospital as a random effect. Next, to account for possible confounding, adjusted models were fit using propensity score weighting to estimate the average treatment effect. Weights were obtained from a mixed logistic regression of mechanism on patient age, sex, race, zip-code rurality, and zip-code median income, with treating discharge year and treating hospital as random effects. Given that the fracture site may mediate the relationship between the mechanism and outcome, it was not included in the propensity scoring model. The previously described generalized linear mixed models were then weighted to adjust for confounding by those demographic variables. Because play and skeletal development vary throughout growth, effect modification by age using likelihood-ratio testing was examined. All analyses were conducted in R version 4.1.1. Significance was set a priori at ɑ = 0.05, and balance was defined at a standardized mean difference (SMD) less than 0.10.

Results

Overall, 133,232 pediatric patients sustaining axial or appendicular orthopaedic fractures associated with trampolines or playground activities were included. A total of 33,030 TRIs (25%) and 100,202 PRIs (75%) were included. Patient characteristics of the entire cohort by mechanism are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics by Fracture Mechanism

Overall Other Playground Equipment Trampoline P
(N = 134,487) (N = 101,038) (N = 33,449)
Year of discharge, median [IQR] 2015 [2012, 2017] 2014 [2012, 2017] 2016 [2013, 2018] <0.001
Age, n (%) <0.001
 Infancy and early childhood (0-4 years) 32288 (24.2) 21771 (21.7) 10517 (31.8)
 Late childhood (5-12 years) 96853 (72.7) 76872 (76.7) 19981 (60.5)
 Adolescence (13-17 years) 4091 (3.1) 1559 (1.6) 2532 (7.7)
Sex, n (%) <0.001
 Male 71358 (53.6) 54607 (54.5) 16751 (50.7)
 Female 61874 (46.4) 45595 (45.5) 16279 (49.3)
Race, n (%) <0.001
 Asian 3809 (2.9) 3382 (3.4) 427 (1.3)
 Black 13242 (9.9) 11157 (11.1) 2085 (6.3)
 Multiracial/other 23813 (17.9) 18778 (18.7) 5035 (15.2)
 White 93598 (70.3) 67854 (67.7) 25744 (77.9)
2010 median household income in US dollars, median [IQR] 45,049 [35,074, 59,144] 45,233 [35,188, 59,555] 44,274 [34,921, 57,841] <0.001
Residential location, n (%) <0.001
 Rural 10943 (8.2) 7268 (7.3) 3675 (11.1)
 Urban 122289 (91.8) 92934 (92.7) 29355 (88.9)
Fracture site <0.001
 Spine 943 (0.7) 717 (0.7) 226 (0.7)
 Arm and shoulder 6900 (5.2) 5351 (5.3) 1549 (4.7)
 Forearm and elbow 66825 (50.2) 53032 (52.9) 13793 (41.8)
 Hand and wrist 38468 (28.9) 33032 (33.0) 5436 (16.5)
 Pelvis 117 (0.1) 76 (0.1) 41 (0.1)
 Hip and thigh 1970 (1.5) 1328 (1.3) 642 (1.9)
 Leg and knee 11251 (8.4) 3611 (3.6) 7640 (23.1)
 Foot and ankle 6758 (5.1) 3055 (3.0) 3703 (11.2)

Patients who sustained fractures from trampolines were more likely to be older, White, and female (P < 0.001) overall. However, subgroup analysis showed that there were actually more young children (<5yo) and children from rural zip codes with lower median incomes injured by a trampoline than other playground equipment (P < 0.001). The most common fracture site for both mechanisms was the forearm and elbow (n = 53,032 [52.9%] in TRIs and 13,793 [41.8%] in PRIs). However, 36% of trampoline fractures and 8% of playground fractures occurred to the lower extremity and 16% of trampoline fractures and 33% of playground fractures occurred to the hand or wrist. Post hoc testing revealed significant heterogeneity in surgical rates by mechanism and fracture site in an adjusted model (P < 0.001). Upper extremity trampoline fractures were more likely to undergo surgical management (upper extremity OR = 1.264 [1.203, 1.329]), but lower extremity trampoline fractures were less likely (lower extremity OR = 0.413 [0.367, 0.465]).

The unadjusted models demonstrated a higher risk of severe fracture (odds ratio = 1.597 95% confidence interval [1.263, 1.931]) but a lower risk of surgical management (OR = 0.954 [0.926, 0.984]). No notable differences were observed in length of stay (Exp(B) = 1.009 [0.997, 1.022]) and complication rates (OR = 1.174 [0.998, 1.38]). With propensity score weighting, balance was achieved on all covariates (max SMD<0.10). After adjustment, the difference in surgical management remained notable (OR = 0.923 [0.883, 0.964]) and the difference in administrative severity reversed, now matching surgical management (OR = 0.900 [0.850, 0.950]).

Turning to effect modification by age, the effect of mechanism varied by age of severity (P < 0.01) and surgical management (P < 0.01). Fractures sustained from trampolines were more likely to be treated surgically in adolescents (OR = 1.192 [1.05, 1.354]) and older children (OR = 1.092 [1.024, 1.166]) but less likely to be treated surgically in younger children (OR = 0.607 [0.561, 0.657]). Similarly, fractures from trampolines were less likely to be severe in infancy and early childhood (OR = 0.763 [0.688, 0.837]) but did not differ in severity in late childhood (OR = 0.967 [0.888, 1.045]) and adolescence (OR = 1.142 [0.969, 1.314]). Model results are further provided in Table 2.

Table 2.

Descriptive Statistics and Effect Estimates of Mechanism on Fracture Outcomes

Overall Other Playground Equipment Trampoline Overall Effects Patient Age-Specific Effects
(N = 134487) (N = 101038) (N = 33449) Unadjusted Adjusted ATT Infancy and Early Childhood Late Childhood Adolescence
Management 0.954 [0.926, 0.984] 0.923 [0.883, 0.964] 0.607 [0.561, 0.657] 1.092 [1.024, 1.166] 1.192 [1.05, 1.354]
 Nonsurgical 100577 (74.8) 75089 (74.3) 25488 (76.2)
 Surgical 33910 (25.2) 25949 (25.7) 7961 (23.8)
Length of stay 1.00 [1.00, 1.00] 1.00 [1.00, 1.00] 1.00 [1.00, 1.00] 1.009 [0.997, 1.022] 1.007 [0.992, 1.022] 0.989 [0.963, 1.016] 1.012 [0.993, 1.032] 1.039 [0.989, 1.091]
Severity 1.166 [1.119, 1.213] 0.900 [0.850, 0.950] 0.763 [0.688, 0.837] 0.967 [0.888, 1.045] 1.142 [0.969, 1.314]
 Minora 119536 (88.9) 90075 (89.1) 29461 (88.1)
 Moderateb 14519 (10.8) 10669 (10.6) 3850 (11.5)
 Severeb 404 (0.3) 278 (0.3) 126 (0.4)
 Extremeb 28 (0.0) 16 (0.0) 12 (0.0)
Complication status 1.174 [0.998, 1.380] 0.977 [0.766, 1.246] 1.117 [0.782, 1.596] 1.197 [0.766, 1.871] 0.804 [0.433, 1.493]
 Uncomplicated 133716 (99.4) 100481 (99.4) 33235 (99.4)
 Complicated 771 (0.6) 557 (0.6) 214 (0.6)
a

Included in the low-severity category.

b

Included in the high-severity category.

Descriptive statistics presented as n (%) or median [IQR]. ATT = average treatment effect on the treated. Effects presented with 95% confidence intervals.

Discussion

Our study assesses whether TRIs are more at risk of surgical management, longer length of stays, complications, and greater administrative severity compared with PRIs. In summary, our results support the understanding that trampolining represents a high-risk activity for young individuals and highlight the importance of recognizing the context in which an injury occurs.25 Notable differences were observed in demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes between pediatric patients presenting with fractures from trampolines and those with fractures from other playground equipment. Youths in late childhood and adolescence were more likely to require surgical management for fractures sustained by trampolines, while younger children injured by trampolines were less likely to require surgical treatment. Although fractures from trampolines were more severe before adjustment, this difference became insignificant after adjustment.

Our study identified an increased rate of surgical management for trampoline fractures for youths in late childhood and adolescence, a finding echoed in other studies as well.10 This increased risk may be due to either the higher forces youths may generate on trampolines compared with other playground equipment or even the risky play styles encouraged on trampolines. The emergence of trampoline parks nationally over the past decade and the associated increased severity of injuries sustained in these environments4,32 likely plays a major role in the observed differences in our cohort. Differences in fracture site distribution may also provide some insight into how fractures sustained after trampoline injuries are more likely to undergo surgical management. Elbow and forearm injuries overall were the most prevalent regardless of the mechanism, a finding echoed by several other studies.3,13,15,26,27 Similarly, there was an elevated rate of lower limb fractures secondary to trampolines, a pattern also reflected in the literature.28 Kim and colleagues28 offered that these injuries may have occurred secondary to a varus shearing or axial compression force. These forces likely mediate the effect of mechanism on fracture pattern, implied by the different rates of surgical management in trampoline fractures.

Patients with fractures from trampolines were more likely to be older, White, and female and live in rural zip codes with a slightly lower median household income. It is difficult to identify the source of these demographic differences. This could be due to differences in factors such as trampoline availability, activity selection, play style, supervision, bone health, and interactions between them. It may reflect differences in playground safety between rural and urban areas, which increased risk of certain injuries.29 Of note, young children (<5yo) were more likely to have been injured by a trampoline than other playground equipment in our sample. Because PHIS only represents what happens after children present to the hospital, we cannot untangle exposure to trampolines from risk on trampolines. Regardless of the reason, these findings suggest that trampoline injury prevention interventions might benefit from responding to the needs of rural communities.

Finally, no differences were found in length of stay or complication rates between the mechanistic groups. The source of this equivalence is not clear. If we had focused on a more high-risk population or injury pattern, other differences may have been identifiable; however, there remain limitations in doing this using PHIS because radiographs are not available for review for more fine-tuned diagnostic considerations. Similar explanations exist for our finding of a comparable complication rate. Because PHIS only records complications that occur during the original encounter, we cannot comment on long-term complications such as malunion, nonunion, or chronic pain.

The findings of this study may facilitate improved counseling by orthopaedic surgeons and musculoskeletal providers regarding risks associated with the studied play equipment. Injuries vary depending on the mechanism, with injuries of the wrist and elbow being common for both playground and trampoline mechanisms. Patients are also more likely to have lower extremity fractures related to trampoline use. Older children and adolescents had an increased odds of surgical management for trampoline injuries while younger children with playground injuries had a greater odds of surgical management compared with trampoline injuries. Public health measures should continue to prevent injuries in children related to recreational activities.

Analysis of this large database comes with inherent limitations. First, the fractures included were only those listed as the primary diagnosis. Second, this data set is not sampled and weighted in a way that can provide national estimates; thus, the results may be affected in part by the availability of studied play equipment in the regions treated by the contributing PHIS hospitals. This also limits the generalizability to national or international populations, and it is not possible to calculate the burden of injury from this study, other than to state that playground injuries accounted for approximately three times more fractures than those that came from trampolines at these hospitals. Third, the data are not granular enough to provide additional information on the mechanisms or whether injuries were recreational or related to participation in organized sports (ie, gymnastics).30 The playground injuries were similarly not defined in relation to specific play equipment. Fourth, because sampling is only from tertiary care children's hospitals, there may be an oversampling of more severe cases that may have been transferred for more specialized or surgical care. Fifth, owing to lack of sampling and weighting to provide national estimates, it is not possible to determine from this study whether the rates of injury are increasing with time31 for either trampoline-related or playground-associated injuries. Miscoding and thus misclassification of injury type (ie, fracture) and etiology (trampoline or playground) based on ICD coding are also acknowledged as a limitation in this administrative study; however, there is no means of investigators cross-checking PHIS coding by medical record or radiographic review in this de-identified multicenter database. Finally, only fractures were considered, but trampolines are also associated with notable orthopaedic soft-tissue injuries21 as well as nonorthopaedic injuries, including dental injury, vascular injury, and concussions.21,33,34,35,36 These dimensions were beyond the scope of our study but should be taken into account when considering public health messaging around trampolines.

In conclusion, youths in late childhood and adolescence sustaining fractures from trampoline use are more likely to undergo surgical management compared with injuries resulting from other playground equipment. Younger children remain at greater risk of injuries from other playground equipment. Our study underscores the need for public health interventions to reduce TRIs and PRIs but also understand demographic factors affecting recreational choices that may affect pediatric orthopaedic epidemiologic findings.

Footnotes

None of the following authors or any immediate family member has received anything of value from or has stock or stock options held in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article: Dr. Malige, Dr. Markiewitz, Dr. Badrinath, Dr. Baldwin, Dr. Wells, and Dr. Williams

IRB Approval: IRB exempt

Contributor Information

Ajith Malige, Email: ajith.malige@gmail.com.

Nathan D. Markiewitz, Email: nathan.markiewitz@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Raghav Badrinath, Email: badrinathr@chop.edu.

Keith D. Baldwin, Email: baldwink@chop.edu.

Lawrence Wells, Email: wellsl@chop.edu.

References

  • 1.Linakis JG, Mello MJ, Machan J, Amanullah S, Palmisciano LM: Emergency department visits for pediatric trampoline-related injuries: An update. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:539-544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rättyä J, Serlo W: Using a safety net and following the safety instructions could prevent half the paediatric trampoline injuries. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2008;18:261-265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hadley-Miller N, Carry PM, Brazell CJ, Holmes KS, Georgopoulos G: Trends in trampoline fractures: 2008-2017. Pediatrics 2020;145:e20190889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Williams BA, Harwood K, Markiewitz N, Malige A, Baldwin KD, Wells L: Seasonal variability and age-related risk in youth trampoline injuries. Pediatr Int 2021;63(10):1230-123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness, American Academy of Pediatrics, Briskin S, LaBotz M: Trampoline safety in childhood and adolescence. Pediatrics 2012;130:774-779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Trampolines and trampoline safety position statement. https://www.aaos.org/contentassets/1cd7f41417ec4dd4b5c4c48532183b96/1135---trampolines-and-trampoline-safety.pdf
  • 7.Karkenny AJ, Burton DA, Maguire KJ, Hanstein R, Otsuka NY: Do professional society advocacy campaigns have an impact on pediatric orthopaedic injuries?. J Pediatr Orthop 2018;38:e122-e127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jones NE, Kelleman M, Little W, Agarwal M: The effect of patient weight on trampoline injury patterns. Pediatrics 2018;142:728. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Frizzell HB, Hartke RE, Huntley AN, Kyllo JL, Russell AS: The risk of recreational trampoline use in the pediatric population: A retrospective study, 2018. https://soar.wichita.edu/handle/10057/15027
  • 10.Choi ES, Hong JH, Sim JA: Distinct features of trampoline-related orthopedic injuries in children aged under 6 years. Injury 2017;49(2):443-446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Doty J, Voskuil R, Davis C, et al. : Trampoline-related injuries: A comparison of injuries sustained at commercial jump parks versus domestic home trampolines. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019;27:23-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Meyerber M, Fraisse B, Dhalluin T, Ryckewaert A, Violas P: Trampoline injuries compared with other child activities. Arch Pediatr 2019;26:282-284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Adelson SL, Chounthirath T, Hodges NL, Collins CL, Smith GA: Pediatric playground-related injuries treated in hospital emergency departments in the United States. Clin Pediatr 2018;57:584-592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Blanchard A, Hamilton A, Li G, Dayan PS: Playground equipment-related extremity fractures in children presenting to US emergency departments, 2006-2016. Inj Epidemiol 2020;7:56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Curnow H, Millar R: Too far to fall: Exploring the relationship between playground equipment and paediatric upper limb fractures. J Paediatr Child Health 2021;57:1651-1657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sharwood LN, Adams S, Blaszkow T, Eager D: Increasing injuries as trampoline parks expand within Australia: A call for mandatory standards. Aust N Z J Public Health 2018;42(2):153-156 doi. 10.1111/1753-6405.12783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Choi ES, Jang JH, Woo JH, Choi JU, Cho JS, Yang HJ: Pediatric trampoline-related injuries in a nationwide registry in South Korea, 2011 to 2016. Yonsei Med J 2018;59:989-994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ibrahim Y, Okoro T: Do trampoline injuries result in more hospital intervention compared to other mechanisms of injury?. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2019;21:41-44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yule MS, Krishna S, Rahiri J-L, Hill AG: Trampoline-associated injuries are more common in children in spring. N Z Med J 2016;129:37-43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shields BJ, Fernandez SA, Smith GA: Comparison of minitrampoline- and full-sized trampoline-related injuries in the United States, 1990-2002. Pediatrics 2005;116:96-103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kasmire KE, Rogers SC, Sturm JJ: Trampoline park and home trampoline injuries. Pediatrics 2016;138:e20161236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.ALL PATIENT REFINED DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUPS (APR-DRGs). https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/APR-DRGsV20MethodologyOverviewandBibliography.pdf
  • 23.Snijders TAB: Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction To Basic And Advanced Multilevel Modeling. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schafer JL: Multiple imputation: A primer. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:3-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sandler G, Nguyen L, Lam L, Manglick MP, Soundappan SSV, Holland AJA: Trampoline trauma in children: Is it preventable?. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011;27:1052-1056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Klimek PM, Juen D, Stranzinger E, Wolf R, Slongo T: Trampoline related injuries in children: Risk factors and radiographic findings. World J Pediatr 2013;9:169-174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Runtz A, Nallet J, Font V, et al. : Trampoline injuries in children: A prospective study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2022;108:103289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kim K-H, Kim H-S, Kang MS, Park S-S: Varus shearing force is a main injury mechanism of pediatric trampoline-related injury in addition to compressive axial loading. PLoS One 2019;14:e0217863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Park MJ, Baldwin K, Weiss-Laxer N, et al. : Composite playground safety measure to correlate the rate of supracondylar humerus fractures with safety: An ecologic study. J Pediatr Orthop 2010;30:101-105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hurson C, Browne K, Callender O, et al. : Pediatric trampoline injuries. J Pediatr Orthop 2007;27:729-732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McDermott C, Quinlan JF, Kelly IP: Trampoline injuries in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:796-798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nunez C, Eslick GD, Elliott EJ: Trampoline centre injuries in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Inj Prev 2022;28:440-445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wechsler B, Kim H, Hunter J: Trampolines, children, and strokes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:608-613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Korhonen L, Salokorpi N, Suo-Palosaari M, Pesälä J, Serlo W, Sinikumpu J-J: Severe trampoline injuries: Incidence and risk factors in children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2017; 28(6):529-533 doi. 10.1055/s-0037-1608676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wieland-Hess A, Eggmann F, Filippi A: Dental injuries on garden trampolines. Swiss Dent J 2021;131. [Online ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Stanbouly D, Stanbouly R, Baron M, et al. : A review of 13,470 head and neck injuries from trampoline jumping. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2022:194338752211256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAAOS Global Research & Reviews are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES