Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 11;14(7):e11325. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11325

TABLE 3.

Pixel‐to‐pixel comparison of each climate scenario to the current predicted suitable area in the Midwest.

Climate model Loss (pixels) Remain occupied (pixels) Remain unoccupied (pixels) Gain (pixels) % Loss % Gain % Species range change Current range size (pixels) Future range size with no dispersal Future range size with full dispersal
GISS‐E2‐1‐H 2021‐2040 SSP1‐2.6C 6286 71,051 39,878 10,173 13.62 22.04 +8.42 46,164 39,878 50,051
GISS‐E2‐1‐H 2061‐2080 SSP1‐2.6C 6950 63,386 39,214 17,838 15.06 38.64 +23.59 46,164 39,214 57,052
GISS‐E2‐1‐H 2021‐2040 SSP5‐8.5C 5721 70,402 40,443 10,822 12.39 23.44 +11.05 46,164 40,443 51,265
GISS‐E2‐1‐H 2061‐2080 SSP5‐8.5C 6992 60,874 39,172 20,350 15.15 44.08 +28.94 46,164 39,172 59,522