1. Having the peace of mind that it is monitored by a professional |
1. The complexity of the equipment |
2. Contact with the clinician |
2. Difficulties in handling equipment |
3. None |
3. Technical and logistical difficulties |
4. Difficulties in moving, potential convenience of the instrument, contact with the referring clinician. |
4. Excessively high number of instruments, network issues, intermittent contact with the clinician. |
5. Contact with the clinician |
5. Anxiety, stress, depression |
6. Contact with the clinician |
6. Anxiety, depression |
7. Contact with the clinician |
7. Anxiety |
8. The especially older patient prefers contact with the clinician |
8. Some patients cannot handle devices |
9. The possibility of being followed by clinicians without the need to travel to the facility |
9. The ‘duty’ to send parameters at set times, or at least punctual slots |
10. Contact with the clinician |
10. Stress |
11. Monitoring makes the patient feel calmer because they know they are constantly being monitored. 24-h monitoring also makes family members feel more relaxed. |
11. Complex applications that make it difficult to use, especially for elderly patients. Connection problems. |
12. Not feeling alone |
12. The thought of being abandoned by the clinician |
13. Ease with which the clinician can reach the patient |
13. Facial contact cannot be replaced with remote |
14. / |
14. / |
15. Contact with the clinician |
15. Stress |
16. The reduction of anxiety because they are constantly monitored |
16. Difficulties in using platforms |
17. Functional alternative |
17. Stress |
18. Contact with the clinician |
18. The obligation to send |
19. Knowing that there is continuous monitoring of their health status |
19. Equipment too complicated to send data |
20. Logistical difficulties, contact with referring clinicians if foreseen |
20. Connection difficulties, asynchronous and untimely communication |
21. Equity of access |
21. Technological difficulties |