Table 2.
Comparison of imaging and laboratory measurements between Nigella sativa and Medroxyprogesterone groups
| Variable | Nigella sativa Mean (SD) |
Medroxyprogesterone Mean (SD) |
Treatment | Time | Time* Treatment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right ovarian volume (cc) | Before | 11.96 (2.94) | 11.95 (2.34) | < 0.770 | 0.213 | 0.002* |
| After | 9.40 (2.12) | 11.17 (2.09) | ||||
| Left ovarian volume (cc) | Before | 11.28 (3.67) | 11.91 (3.07) | 0.316 | 0.343 | 0.010* |
| After | 8.36 (2.68) | 10.84 (3.29) | ||||
| Endometrial thickness (cm) | Before | 10.24 (3.15) | 9.01 (1.48) | < 0.001* | 0.317 | 0.002* |
| After | 7.30 (2.04) | 7.78 (1.55) | ||||
| DHEA (ng/dL) | Before | 123.74 (36.49) | 125.02 (29.07) | 0.736 | 0.232 | 0.074 |
| After | 113.91 (28.11) | 126.44 (28.88) | ||||
| DHEA-S (ng/dL) | Before | 128.79 (39.65) | 133.98 (35.44) | 0.628 | 0.559 | 0.120 |
| After | 113.89 (31.10) | 131.96 (34.28) | ||||
| Testosterone (ng/dL) | Before | 0.56 (0.49) | 0.66 (0.67) | 0.369 | 0.040* | 0.001* |
| After | 0.33 (0.27) | 0.65 (0.69) | ||||
| Hirsutism severity score | Before | 3.98 (1.56) | 3.75 (1.40) | 0.111 | 0.001* | < 0.001* |
| After | 1.36 (0.85) | 3.38 (1.79) | ||||
| LH (mU/dL) | Before | 15.72 (3.19) | 14.29 (3.40) | 0.013* | 0.004* | < 0.001* |
| After | 9.90 (2.06) | 13.57 (2.87) | ||||
| BMI (kg/m 2 ) | Before | 25.56 (3.63) | 23.84 (2.61) | < 0.001* | 0.517 | 0.252 |
| After | 24.57 (2.36) | 23.72 (2.47) | ||||
| WHR | Before | 0.92 (0.06) | 0.89 (0.06) | 0.064 | 0.768 | 0.814 |
| After | 0.92 (0.07) | 0.90 (0.07) | ||||
| SBP (mmHg) | Before | 105.10 (5.67) | 103.30 (5.37) | 0.035* | 0.700 | 0.610 |
| After | 105.04 (4.69) | 103.28 (4.24) | ||||
| DBP (mmHg) | Before | 71.10 (2.73) | 71.51 (2.87) | 0.548 | 0.433 | 0.330 |
| After | 71.66 (2.27) | 71.55 (2.51) | ||||
DHEA: dehydroepiandrosterone, DHEA-S: dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, LH: Luteinizing Hormone, BMI: Body Mass Index, WHR: Waist-hip ratio, SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure, DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure
The repeated measures analysis of variance was used for the analysis
* Significant effect