Table 4.

Correlation analyses with EMG.

	Valence	Arousal	Dominance	Sop
EMG1_Mean_Freq_mean	r = −0.349, p = 0.018 *, 95% CI [−0.065, −0.580]	r = 0.060, p = 0.692, 95% CI [−0.234, 0.344]	r = −0.123, p = 0.417, 95% CI [−0.399, 0.174]	r = −0.136, p = 0.367, 95% CI [−0.410, 0.160]
EMG1_Mean_Freq_sd	r = 0.158, p = 0.294, 95% CI [−0.139, 0.429]	r = −0.077, p = 0.611, 95% CI [−0.359, 0.218]	r = 0.187, p = 0.214, 95% CI [−0.109, 0.453]	r = 0.118, p = 0.435, 95% CI [−0.178, 0.395]
EMG1_Ampl_mean	r = −0.051, p = 0.737, 95% CI [−0.336, 0.243]	r = −0.030, p = 0.843, 95% CI [−0.318, 0.263]	r = 0.018, p = 0.906, 95% CI [−0.274, 0.307]	r = −0.036, p = 0.812, 95% CI [−0.323, 0.257]
EMG1_Ampl_sd	r = −0.095, p = 0.531, 95% CI [−0.375, 0.201]	r = −0.051, p = 0.735, 95% CI [−0.337, 0.243]	r = −0.004, p = 0.979, 95% CI [−0.287, 0.294]	r = −0.054, p = 0.723, 95% CI [−0.339, 0.240]
EMG2_Mean_Freq_mean	r = 0.248, p = 0.096, 95% CI [−0.045, 0.502]	r = 0.072, p = 0.633, 95% CI [−0.223, 0.355]	r = 0.185, p = 0.218, 95% CI [−0.111, 0.451]	r = 0.316, p = 0.032 *, 95% CI [0.555, 0.028]
EMG2_Mean_Freq_sd	r = −0.211, p = 0.160, 95% CI [−0.472, 0.085]	r = −0.068, p = 0.652, 95% CI [−0.352, 0.226]	r = 0.006, p = 0.967, 95% CI [−0.285, 0.296]	r = −0.127, p = 0.400, 95% CI [0.170, −0.402]
EMG2_Ampl_mean	r = −0.207, p = 0.166, 95% CI [−0.470, 0.088]	r = −0.013, p = 0.930, 95% CI [−0.302, 0.278]	r = −0.061, p = 0.687, 95% CI [−0.345, 0.233]	r = 0.002, p = 0.990, 95% CI [−0.289, 0.292]
EMG2_Ampl_sd	r = −0.355, p = 0.015 *, 95% CI [−0.585, −0.072]	r = −0.018, p = 0.905, 95% CI [−0.274, 0.307]	r = −0.200, p = 0.182, 95% CI [−0.463, 0.096]	r = −0.065, p = 0.666, 95% CI [−0.349, 0.229]

Note. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.