Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 18;2015(3):CD010217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010217.pub2

Comparison 1. Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation versus no treatment/sham treatment.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Serious adverse events 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Disease‐specific quality of life: number of women with an I‐QOL score improvement ≥ 10 points at 12 months 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Clinician observations: objective measurement of incontinence: change in leak point pressure at 12 months 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Other adverse event: pain/dysuria: dysuria 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Other adverse event: (new) detrusor overactivity: overactive bladder symptoms 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6 Other adverse event: de novo urinary retention: urinary retention 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
7 Other adverse event: urinary tract infection 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
8 Other adverse event: haematuria 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
9 Other adverse event: hesitancy 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected