Table 2.
Comparison of mean T-and Z-scores stratified by DXA measurement site between the periprosthetic fracture cohort and the two control cohorts
DXA measurement site mean (± SD) | PPF n = 40 | AR n = 40 | OA n = 40 | p-value (PPF vs. AR) | p-value (PPF vs. OA) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lumbar spine (n) | 35 | 35 | 35 | ||
T-score | − 1.09 (± 1.78) | − 0.12 (± 1.77) | − 0.37 (± 1.29) | 0.022 | 0.087 |
Z-score | − 0.03 (± 1.78) | 0.80 (± 1.70) | 0.54 (± 1.32) | 0.049 | 0.190 |
Total hip (n) | 26 | 26 | 26 | ||
T-score | − 1.74 (± 1.92) | − 0.76 (± 1.30) | − 0.79 (± 1.13) | 0.023 | 0.023 |
Z-score | − 0.61 (± 1.70) | 0.19 (± 1.37) | 0.25 (± 0.94) | 0.035 | 0.029 |
Bold indicates significant differences
DXA dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, PPF periprosthetic fracture, AR aseptic revision, OA osteoarthritis