Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 4;115(2):142–149. doi: 10.1007/s00223-024-01237-w

Table 2.

Comparison of mean T-and Z-scores stratified by DXA measurement site between the periprosthetic fracture cohort and the two control cohorts

DXA measurement site mean (± SD) PPF n = 40 AR n = 40 OA n = 40 p-value (PPF vs. AR) p-value (PPF vs. OA)
Lumbar spine (n) 35 35 35
  T-score − 1.09 (± 1.78) − 0.12 (± 1.77) − 0.37 (± 1.29) 0.022 0.087
  Z-score − 0.03 (± 1.78) 0.80 (± 1.70) 0.54 (± 1.32) 0.049 0.190
Total hip (n) 26 26 26
  T-score − 1.74 (± 1.92) − 0.76 (± 1.30) − 0.79 (± 1.13) 0.023 0.023
  Z-score − 0.61 (± 1.70) 0.19 (± 1.37) 0.25 (± 0.94) 0.035 0.029

Bold indicates significant differences

DXA dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, PPF periprosthetic fracture, AR aseptic revision, OA osteoarthritis