Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 4;46(8):1177–1184. doi: 10.1007/s00276-024-03427-5

Table 2.

Categorization of portal veins of 178 patients based on different classifications

BLB classification Present cohort Atri et al.(1) Cheng et al.(6) Covey et al.(2)
Type I 112 (62.9) Normal Type: 112 (62.9) Type 1: 112 (62.9) Type 1: 112 (62.9)
Type II 37 (20.8) 37 (20.8) 35 (19.7) 30 (16.9)
IIa 23 (12.9) Type 1a: 23 (12.9) Type 2: 23 (12.9) Type 2: 23 (12.9)
IIb 7 (3.9) Type 1b: 7 (3.9) Type 3: 7 (3.9) Type 3: 7 (3.9)
IIc 5 (2.8) Type 1c: 5 (2.8) Type 4: 5 (2.8) n.d.
IId 2 (1.1) Type 1d: 2 (1.1) n.d. n.d.
Type III 1 (0.6) Type 2: 1 (0.6) n.d. n.d.
Type IV 28 (15.7) n.d. n.d. 9 (5.1)
IVa 1 (0.6) n.d. n.d. n.d.
IVb 1 (0.6) n.d. n.d. n.d.
IVc 3 (1.7) n.d. n.d. n.d.
IVd 6 (3.4) n.d. n.d. Type 4: 6 (3.4)
IVe 3 (1.7) n.d. n.d. Type 5: 3 (1.7)
IVf 6 (3.4) n.d. n.d. n.d.
IVg 8 (4.5) n.d. n.d. n.d.
Matching ratio* 178 of 178 (100) 150 of 178 (84.3)† 147 of 178 (82.6)† 151 of 178 (84.8)†

Values in parentheses are percentages. *Proportion of portal veins from 178 patients that could be depicted by each classification system. n.d., Portal vein configuration not defined in corresponding classification. †P < 0.001 versus matching ratio for BLB classification (χ2 test)