Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 4;46(8):1177–1184. doi: 10.1007/s00276-024-03427-5

Table 3.

Portal vein types recorded in other studies re-evaluated based on BLB classification system and Atri’s classification

BLB classification Sureka et al.(4)
(n = 967)
Koç et al.(10)
(n = 1384)
Gunasekaran et al.(9)
(n = 100)
Covey et al.(2)
(n = 200)
Type I 773 (79.9) 1045 (75.5) 67 (67.0) 130 (65.0)
Type II
IIa 66 (6.8) 154 (11.1) 10 (10.0) 18 (9.0)
IIb 48 (5.0) 134 (9.7) 6 (6.0) 26 (13.0)
IIc
IId
Type III
Type IV
IVa 2 (0.2)
IVb 5 (0.5)
IVc 1 (0.5)
IVd 26 (2.7) 7 (0.5) 1 (1.0) 2 (1.0)
IVe 16 (1.7) 26 (1.9) 8 (8.0) 12 (6.0)
IVf 3 (0.3) 2 (0.1) 7 (3.5)
IVg 1 (0.1) 5 (5.0) 1 (0.5)
Matching ratio in BLB classification 939 of 967 (97.1)* 1369 of 1384 (98.9)* 97 of 100 (97.0)* 197 of 200 (98.5)*
Matching ratio in Atri’s classification 887 of 967 (91.7) 1333 of 1384 (96.3) 83 of 100 (83.0) 174 of 200 (87.0)

Values in parentheses are percentages. *P < 0.001 versus matching ratio in Atri’s classification for each study (χ2 test)