Table 6.
Summary of studies evaluating LipiFlow in patients undergoing cataract surgery or with treated glaucoma
| Author/design/country | Patients (eyes)/age, mean (SD) | Last FU after LF Tx | Study arms | MG function Mean (SD) |
Patient-reported symptoms Mean (SD) |
TBUT Mean (SD) |
Staining | Overall conclusion and safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |||||
| Cataract | ||||||||||||
|
Schlatter 2023 [63] Prospective, randomized, controlled, investigator-masked |
N = 31 patients with MGD and cataract (62 eyes), 44 (16) years; LF: N = 29 eyes; CL: N = 29 eyes |
3 months preop |
Single 12-min LF Tx before cataract surgery CL: untreated |
MGSS LF: 9.5 (5.2) CL: 9.9 (4.9) |
MGSS LF: 14.4 (9.1)* CL: 13.6 (10.5) |
NR | NR |
TBUT LF: 5.6 (2.7) CL: 4.9 (2.1) |
TBUT LF: 8.8 (4.4)* CL: 7.8 (4.4)* |
NR | NR |
Tear film parameters improved in LF eyes, but effect on spherical IOL selection was negligible AEs N = 1 (stye unrelated to LF) |
|
Mencucci 2023 [66] Prospective, unmasked, randomized controlled Italy |
N = 46 patients with cataract and mild/moderate MGD (46 eyes), LF: N = 23 patients (23 eyes), 73 (8) years CL: N = 23 patients (23 eyes), 75 (8) years |
1 month (pre-cataract surgery) 2 months (= 1 month post-cataract surgery) |
Single 12-min LF Tx CL: warm compress, massage BID for 1 month |
MGYLS LF: 7.3 (0.8) CL: 7.7 (0.6) MGSS LF: 0.65 (0.77) CL: 0.33 (0.56) |
MGYLS 1 month (preop): LF: 7.8 (0.51)* CL: 7.8 (0.4) 2 months (postop): LF: 7.9 (0.3)*† CL: 7.5 (0.7) MGSS 1 month (preop): LF: 0.21 (0.52)* CL: 0.21 (0.41) 2 months (postop): LF: 0.13 (0.34)*† CL: 0.54 (0.60) |
SPEED LF: 6.1 (2.8) CL: 5.8 (1.5) |
SPEED 1 month (preop): LF: 3.9 (2.2)*† CL: 5.1 (1.5) 2 months (postop): LF: 4.0 (1.8)*† CL: 6.0 (1.2) |
NIKBUT LF: 5.2 (1.3) CL: 5.7 (1.2) |
NIKBUT 1 month (preop): LF: 6.2 (1.7)* CL: 6.0 (1.2) 2 months (postop): LF: 6.3 (1.9)*† CL: 5.1 (1.5) |
Corneal LF: 0.26 (0.44) CL: 0.13 (0.33) |
Corneal 1 month (preop): LF: 0.13 (0.33) CL: 0.13 (0.33) 2 months (postop): LF: 0.13 (0.34) CL: 0.13 (0.33) |
Preop LF Tx prevented postcataract surgery DED in patients with mild-to-moderate MGD. LF-treated patients had a better ocular surface status than CL AEs None No pain or discomfort |
|
Matossian 2023 [67] Prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover, multicenter USA |
N = 121 patients with mild-to-moderate MGD and cataract; LF: N = 117 eyes, 65 (8) years; CL: N = 115 eyes, 65 (8) years |
3 months (3 months post-cataract surgery) CO: 1 month (4 months post-cataract surgery) |
Single 12-min LF Tx CL: untreated |
NR |
MGSS: Change from BL to 3 months (postop): LF: 7.3 (9.3)† CL: 4.7 (10.1) MGYLS Change from BL to 1 month postop: LF: 1.6 (3.1) CL: 1.1 (3.3) CO MGSS: Change from 3 to 4 months postop: LF: 4.1 (11.0)† |
NR |
SPEED: Change from BL to 3 months: LF: -2.1 (5.3) CL:-1.5 (5.6) CO SPEED: Change from 3 to 4 months postop: LF: − 1.2 (5.6) |
NR |
TBUT Change from BL to 1 month postop: LF: 0.69 (4.6) CL: 0.06 (3.7) |
NR |
Corneal Change from BL to 1 month postop: LF: − 0.57 (2.3)† CL: 0.20 (3.2) Conjunct Change from BL to 1 month postop: LF: − 1.2 (3.8)† CL: 0.45 (4.0) |
Presurgical LF Tx of patients implanted with range-of-vision IOLs improved MG function and postop ocular surface health. LF Tx reduced postop halos and improved VA AEs None related to LF, all related to cataract surgery |
|
Park 2021 [69] Prospective, randomized controlled study Korea |
N = 124 patients with cataract (MGD was not a requirement) (124 eyes); LF: N = 60 patients (60 eyes), 64 (9) years CL: N = 48 patients (48 eyes), 65 (12) years |
3 months postop |
Single 12-min LF Tx CL: untreated |
MGSS LF: 1.0 (0.9) CL: 0.9 (0.8) MGYLS LF: 6.0 (2.1) CL:6.6 (2.1) |
MGSS LF: 0.9 (0.9)*† CL: 1.7 (0.8)* MGYLS LF: 7.1 (1.7)*† CL: 5.6 (2.6)* |
OSDI LF: 37.9 (20.2) CL: 34.3 (20.1) |
OSDI LF: 22.3 (16.5)*† CL: 29.8 (20.8) |
TBUT LF: 3.5 (1.5) CL: 3.7 (1.5) |
TBUT LF: 4.4 (1.8)*† CL: 3.6 (1.6) |
Corneal LF:0.77 (0.90) CL: 0.68 (0.92) |
Corneal LF: 0.46 (0.56)* CL: 0.62 (0.56) |
LF Tx conducted prior to cataract surgery may be safe and effective for relieving MGD and dry eye induced by surgery AEs None. No pain at insertion, treatment, or removal |
|
Zhao Y 2021 [68] Prospective, examiner-masked controlled, contralateral eye China |
N = 32 patients with MGD and cataract (64 eyes); N = 16 patients undergoing cataract surgery, LF: N = 16 eyes, CL: N = 16 eyes, 62 (10) years; N = 16 patients no surgery (control), LF: N = 16 eyes, CL: N = 16 eyes, 62 (2) years In both groups LF in 1 eye and untreated contralateral eye |
3 months |
Single 12-min LF Tx CL: untreated |
MGYLS LF/surgery: 2.1 (1.8) CL/surgery: 1.9 (1.8) LF/non-surgery: 1.8 (1.8) CL/non-surgery: 2.6 (2.5) |
MGYLS median change from BL: LF/surgery: 4.0* CL/surgery: − 2.0 LF/non-surgery: 3.0* CL/non-surgery: 0.0 (P < 0.05 vs. CL/surgery) |
SPEED xx1 |
SPEED xx1 |
TBUT LF/surgery: 5.0 (2.3) CL/surgery: 4.9 (2.6) LF/non-surgery: 2.5 (0.6) CL/non-surgery: 2.8 (1.1) |
TBUT median change from BL: LF/surgery: − 2.5 CL/surgery: − 2.0 LF/non-surgery: 1.0 (P < 0.05 vs. LF/surgery) CL/non-surgery: 0.0 (P < 0.05 vs. CL/surgery) |
Corneal LF/surgery: 3.1 (0.4) CL/surgery: 3.2 (0.5) LF/non-surgery: 2.0 (0.5) CL/non-surgery: 1.9 (0.8) |
Corneal xx1 |
LF Tx before cataract surgery is effective in diminishing the blockage of MG and preventing a decline of TBUT after cataract surgery. Safety NR |
|
Szabelska 2023 [64] Open-label case series Poland |
N = 6 patients with MGD and cataract (11 eyes), 67 years | 6 weeks | Single 12-min LF Tx 6 weeks pre-cataract surgery | NR | NR |
OSDI LF: 31.1 |
OSDI LF: 22.7 |
TBUT LF: 9.1 |
TBUT LF: 13.9 |
NR | NR |
Stabilization of visual system parameters after LF improved accuracy of IOL power recommendation. Safety NR |
|
Matossian 2020 [65] Single-center, pilot, retrospective USA |
N = 23 patients with MGD and cataract (25 eyes), 73 (8) years | 6 weeks | Single 12-min LF Tx 6 weeks pre- cataract surgery | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
LF Tx resulted in less residual refractive astigmatism compared with pre-LF keratometry readings, which altered astigmatism management/ IOL selection. Safety NR |
| Glaucoma | ||||||||||||
|
Kasetsuwan 2020 [70] Prospective, randomized, observer-blind Thailand |
N = 60 patients with well-controlled glaucoma and MGD; LF: N = 26 patients (26 eyes), 67 (11) years; CL: N = 22 patients (22 eyes), 70 (8) years |
6 months |
Single 12-min LF Tx plus lid hygiene CL: lid hygiene: warm compress, massage, baby shampoo, BID for 6 months |
MGSS LF: 21.5 (5.8) CL: 22.5 (5.9) |
MGSS change from BL: LF: 4.7* CL: 3.0* |
OSDI LF: 23.7 (11.8) CL: 26.8 (18.2) |
OSDI change from BL: LF: − 7.8* CL: -11.8* |
TBUT LF: 5.4 (3.7) CL: 6.0 (5.4) |
TBUT Change from BL: LF: − 0.30 CL:-0.58 |
Corneal LF: 1.3 (0.8) CL: 1.0 (0.6) |
Corneal Change from BL: LF: 0 CL: 0 |
Adding LF Tx to lid hygiene significantly improved MG function and symptoms at 6 months AEs LF: N = 7 patients (N = 1 difficulty inserting the device, N = 5 mild discomfort immediately after Tx, N = 1 mild conjunctival injection CL: N = NR discomfort during massage. No IOP elevation or uncontrolled IOP that required additional antiglaucoma Tx |
Units of measure are as follows: MGSS = points, score 0–45; MGYLS = number of functional glands; NIKBUT = seconds; OSDI = points, score 0–100; SANDE = visual analog scale score, 0–100; SPEED = points, score 0–28; staining = scale score; TBUT = seconds; VAS = scale score
AEs adverse events, BID 2 times per day, BL baseline, CL control, CO crossover group, conjunct conjunctival, D diopters, DED dry eye disease, FU follow-up, IOL intraocular lens, LF LipiFlow, MG meibomian glands, MGSS number of expressible meibomian glands, MGYLS meibomian glands secretion score, min minutes, NIKBUT noninvasive keratograph break-up time, NR not reported, OSDI ocular surface disease index, pre pretreatment, post post-treatment, SD standard deviation, SPEED standard patient evaluation of eye dryness, TBUT tear break-up time, Tx treatment, VA visual acuity
*P ≤ 0.05 vs. baseline
†P ≤ 0.05 vs. control
1Data only presented in a figure. We did not extrapolate the data from the figure to avoid presenting estimated data