Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2024 May 4;64(2):418–428. doi: 10.1007/s12088-024-01297-4

Extremophiles in Space Exploration

Jasvinder Kaur 1,✉,#, Jaspreet Kaur 2,✉,#, Aeshna Nigam 3
PMCID: PMC11246395  PMID: 39010991

Abstract

In the era of deep space exploration, extremophile research represents a key area of research w.r.t space survival. This review thus delves into the intriguing realm of ‘Space and Astro Microbiology’, providing insights into microbial survival, resilience, and behavioral adaptations in space-like environments. This discussion encompasses the modified behavior of extremophilic microorganisms, influencing virulence, stress resistance, and gene expression. It then shifts to recent studies on the International Space Station and simulated microgravity, revealing microbial responses that impact drug susceptibility, antibiotic resistance, and its commercial implications. The review then transitions into Astro microbiology, exploring the possibilities of interplanetary transit, lithopanspermia, and terraforming. Debates on life's origin and recent Martian meteorite discoveries are noted. We also discuss Proactive Inoculation Protocols for selecting adaptable microorganisms as terraforming pioneers. The discussion concludes with a note on microbes’ role as bioengineers in bioregenerative life support systems, in recycling organic waste for sustainable space travel; and in promoting optimal plant growth to prepare Martian and lunar basalt. This piece emphasizes the transformative impact of microbes on the future of space exploration.

Keywords: Space microbiology, Astro-microbiology, Lithopanspermia, Extremophiles

Introduction

Earth has a hospitable biosphere protected by the vast blanket of atmosphere, creating a safe space for life to thrive. Whereas, space constitutes an extremely cold and hostile environment characterized by intense solar and galactic radiation fields, solar wind, and a gravitational force ranging from 10−3 to 10−6 g, resulting in microgravity or weightlessness, alongside a complete absence of atmosphere (high vacuum). These harsh conditions are further exacerbated by temperature extremes (153–393 K), the absence of atmospheric pressure (10−7 to 10−4 Pa), and increased levels of carbon dioxide (partial pressure of 0.2–0.5 kPa) [1, 2]. This makes it hard to imagine life beyond Earth. However, microbes are omnipresent and extremophilic microbes with great adaptability to survive stress may emerge as the most plausible entities capable of enduring such environmental extremes [3, 4]. This assumption is drawn from the experiments in real and simulated space conditions where microbes exhibit resilience and survival, suggesting their potential adaptability to space-like environments.

Microbes over the past six decades have become closely linked to key aspects of space research such as manned and unmanned missions, interplanetary travel (related to panspermia), search for extra-terrestrial life as well as pharmaceutical applications. Various studies in the field of space microbiology delve into altered microbial responses in response to microgravity. These include changes in colony formation, alterations in secondary metabolite synthesis such as enhanced production of antibiotics, and increased virulence. The progress of vaccine development is being enhanced by leveraging the microgravity conditions present on the International Space Station (www.esa.int). Yet another exciting aspect, Astro microbiology offers prospects for investigating the feasibility of ‘terraforming’, the process of transforming inhospitable planets like Mars into habitable ones, capable of sustaining life. Microbes residing beneath the surface could be potential candidates for terraforming [5]. Thus, space exploration not only deepens our cosmic knowledge but also drives technological advancements, with microbes playing a crucial role in overcoming challenges in advanced space exploration by being ‘tiny bioengineers’. The exploration of microbiology w.r.t. space is vital for future crewed missions and human welfare worldwide [6, 7]. In recent years, space biology research has seen a surge in development, with ISS facilities incorporating fully automated technologies to conduct biological experiments. This advancement is exemplified by the use of Biological CubeSats equipped with biosensors, offering a cost-effective alternative to complex manned spaceflight missions, as highlighted by Kanapskyte et al. (2021) [8]. Moreover, India's successful launch of Chandrayaan-3 by ISRO provided crucial insights into lunar conditions [9], emphasizing the significance of in-situ scientific experiments to comprehend the space environment and its potential for life. In light of these advancements, this review offers a comprehensive exploration of the importance of space microbiological research and its practical applications on Earth, underscoring the interconnectedness between space exploration and terrestrial innovation.

Space Microbiology

Microbial Resilience and Behavioural Changes in Space-Like Environments

The first microbiological experiments in space were conducted by Zhukov-Verezhnikov and his team in the 1960s on flights that simulated the orbit of the spaceship Vostok I. They suggested that the microgravity environment of space did not have an effect on microbe viability [10]. Following that, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) launched Escherichia coli, onboard the Vostok 2 spacecraft, resulting in the discovery of a variant colony type that was later revealed to be a result of spaceflight conditions [11].

The impact of microgravity and radiation on microorganisms has been investigated through simulated space conditions [12, 13] employing ground-based equipment such as Rotating Wall-Vessel bioreactors (RWVs). Under the effect of low gravity, the rotation of nutrient media within the bioreactor counteracts the slow sedimentation of cells, resulting in a continuous 'free-fall' of cells through the culture medium (Fig. 1). This unique setup creates a low-shear environment that could influence the growth and behaviour of cells. These bioreactors play a crucial role in understanding microbial responses that might manifest during spaceflight. These responses encompass factors such as virulence, resistance to thermal and oxidative stress, biofilm formation, growth, membrane integrity, and differential gene expression in various bacteria (Table 1). Some observed responses, such as changes in gene expression, occurred under simulated microgravity conditions and are indicative of adaptive mechanisms in microbes. In a specific study, E. coli cells were cultured both in spaceflight (experimental) and ground (control) conditions, with increased levels of gentamicin present. A comparison of the results revealed that cells adapted to this antibiotic faster in spaceflight conditions compared to their ground-based counterparts. To identify the genes responsible for this adaptation, researchers conducted transcriptomic analysis of bacterial cells as part of the study [14]. Their analysis revealed that 50 stress-responsive genes, including those responsive to antibiotics, were upregulated in microgravity. Notably, genes such as rpoS and oxyR exhibited heightened responses to increasing gentamicin concentrations in space, contrasting with their behavior in Earth-based control conditions.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a Cells suspend at the bottom of a rotating vessel on Earth; b and c while they stay suspended in the nutrient media and do not sediment at the bottom of culture vessel under microgravity and experience a constant free fall through the medium in RWVs

Table 1.

Microbial responses to simulated or modelled conditions of microgravity

Microorganism Simulated microgravity response (within the RWV bioreactor) References*
S. typhimurium c3339 Increased virulence in a mouse model; resistance to acid, thermal, and osmotic stress; macrophage survival, decreased: LPS production; resistance to oxidative stress; Hfq expression, Differential gene expression [1518]
E. coli AMS6 Increased biofilm formation and resistance to osmotic, ethanol and antibiotic stress [19]
P. aeruginosa PA01 Increased: biofilm formation; elastase production, and rhamnolipid production; alginate production; resistance to oxidative and thermal stress; Hfq expression- differential gene expression [20, 21]
Streptococcus pneumoniae TIGR4 Differential gene expression [22, 23]
S. aureus N315 Increased: biofilm formation; susceptibility to whole blood- decreased: growth; carotenoid production; resistance to oxidative stress; Hfq expression [24]
Yersina Pestis KIMD27 Decreased: Hela cell rounding [25]
Haloferax mediterranei Increased antibiotic resistance- differential pigment production and protein expression [26]
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Increased aberrant budding, differential gene expression [27]
Candida albicans Increased: filamentous growth; biofilm formation; antimicrobial resistance-differential gene expression [28, 29]

*Information taken from International Space Station (ISS) researcher’s guide (microbial research), published by the NASA ISS Program Science Office (June 2013 edition)

Among the first group of microorganisms examined in space were Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterobacter aerogenes [30]. This list continued to expand with each successive space mission, such as bacteriophage T-1, the tobacco mosaic virus, and, more recently, osmophilic microbes, all subjects of spaceborne investigations before their return to Earth [31]. Notably, Bacillus subtilis and Chroococcidiopsis have established themselves as pivotal species in the realm of spaceflight experiments, having undergone testing in low Earth orbit (LEO), simulated space conditions, atmospheric re-entry, and 'in-impact' events during planetary ejections [3234]. These studies have underscored the remarkable resilience of microbes in the unforgiving space environment [35].

The halophilic archaea Halorubrum chaoviator, part of the BIOPAN mission in 1994, demonstrated its ability to endure both simulated and actual space conditions for two weeks [36]. Research has also probed the feasibility of cultivating bacteria on Mars, provided they are shielded from UV radiation. Notably, it is recognized that a mere few millimeters of Martian soil would suffice for UV protection [37, 38]. A few studies have explored this possibility, for instance, Bacillus subtilis endospores have demonstrated the capacity to endure space for up to six years when shielded by dust particles from solar UV rays [10]. Additionally, dried biofilms of Chroococcidiopsis have shown the potential to persist on Mars for over half a decade [39]. Biofilms, considered among the earliest signs of life on Earth and posited to have a presence on other planets, were investigated further in the "Biofilm organisms surfing space (BOSS)" experiment conducted during the EXPOSE-R2 campaign (2014–2016) [40]. In this experiment, microorganisms were exposed in both planktonic cells and biofilm forms. The microbial participants included (i) Deinococcus geothermalis, a polyextremophilic bacterium known for superior desiccation and radiation tolerance compared to Deinococcus radiodurans; (ii) Gloeocapsa sp., a cyanobacterium derived from limestone following prolonged exposure to space during the ADAPT experiment on the EXPOSE-E facility; and (iii) desert strains of the cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis spp. These findings indicated that the biofilm mode of life supports microorganisms' long-term survival in harsh environmental conditions in space and on Mars more effectively than the planktonic lifestyle.

Beyond bacterial cells, the impact of microgravity has also been explored on fungal cells. For example, Knufia chersonesos, a melanotic microfungus renowned for its exceptional poly-extreme-tolerance, is anticipated to thrive in the challenging conditions of space [41]. Notably, this fungus exhibited early hyphae formation under microgravity conditions, manifesting on day 5 instead of the typical day 7 observed under normal gravity. Consequently, the study suggests that black fungi may possess the capability to adapt to microgravity conditions and proposes that the melanisation of their cell wall may influence metabolic responses to microgravity. In a separate investigation conducted by Blachowicz and colleagues in 2019, they utilized proteomic analysis to examine ISS samples of Aspergillus fumigatus, a filamentous fungus, aiming to understand its molecular adaptations in response to the distinctive environment of space. Their research revealed that certain proteins exhibited elevated gene expression levels in space, notably those associated with stress-response (Pst2 and ArtA), carbohydrate metabolism (PdcA and AcuE), and secondary metabolism (TpcA, TpcF, and TpcK) [42]. A multiomics approach was used by Ott et al. in 2020 [43], to understand the molecular response of D. radiodurans post exposure to low Earth orbit. They concluded that the stress response of D. radiodurans to LEO resulted in increased abundance of cell proteins of the cell envelope associated with transportation along with intensive vesiculation. This facilitates their nutrient uptake, removal of cellular waste as well as distribution of potential signaling molecules in extreme conditions of space. They also observed the role of putrescine and Reactive Oxygen Species, scavenging proteins like catalases, to play a role in antioxidant defense mechanisms to protect against outer space- induced oxidative damage [43].

In a recent study by Singh et al. [44], a genomic analysis was conducted on five multi-drug resistant strains of Enterobacter bugandensis, which were isolated from the ISS. The objective was to understand their pathogenic potential. The study revealed the presence of 112 genes in these strains associated with virulence, disease, and defense, including the identification of multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) locus.

The differential expression of stress response genes in spaceflight conditions also leads to variations in drug susceptibility and resistance profiles among microorganisms. The differences in gene expression are the response of microbial cells due to natural selection as they are subjected to environmental stress in spaceflights. Such genetic changes act as adaptive strategies of microbes to survive the extremes of the space environment [45]. During the space shuttle mission STS-115, Salmonella typhimurium grown aboard exhibited enhanced virulence in a murine model which was due to upregulation of Hfq, a regulator in response to environmental stress [46]. Certain identification of vaccine targets have also risen from microgravity-induced changes, such as increased virulence in Salmonella sp., a common cause of food poisoning, observed at NASA's ISS [4749]. Astrogenetix, a biotech company, has created a promising vaccine candidate for this particular pathogen and is presently in the initial phases of planning its assessment and commercial development (www.nasa.gov). Furthermore, Astrogenetix is actively engaged in space-based research to develop vaccine candidates in microgravity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, www.astrogenetix.com). This phenomenon of altered microbial responses may be attributed to the impact of physical forces surrounding cells, leading to alterations in the extracellular environment. Consequently, these changes affect the mass transfer between cells and their surroundings [50]. This in turn opens avenues for the systematic screening of microbes on a large scale to facilitate the production of desired compounds such as antibiotics and secondary metabolites [5153].

In this regard, numerous studies have meticulously documented diverse microbial responses potentially linked to space-like conditions. Noteworthy findings include a decrease in colony forming units (CFUs) in B. subtilis spores [54, 55], heightened conjugation in E. coli [56, 57], and an upsurge in virulence in S. typhimurium [58, 59]. Alterations in secondary metabolite synthesis have also been observed [53] such as an increase in Actinomycin D production in Streptomyces plicatus during the US Space Shuttle mission STS-80 [60], increased Avermectin production in Streptomyces avermitilis during Diamagnetic levitation experiments [61], and heightened production of Microcystin in Microcystis aeruginosa in Rotary cell culture system (RCCS) [62]. Production of Fumigaclavine A by Aspergillus fumigatus increased on ISS, so did Monorden’s production in Humicola fuscoatra increased when grown aboard Space Shuttle mission STS-77 as compared to ground controls [63]. Additionally, Chinese space-based experiments have shown an increased production of Nikomycin by Streptomyces ansochromogenus, Tylosin by Streptomyces fradiae, Kanglemycin C by Nocardia mediterranei and vitamin C by a mixed culture of Ketogulonicigenium vulgare and Bacillus thuringiensis [64, 65].

On the contrary, inhibition of Rapamycin production was noted in Streptomyces hygroscopicus in the Rotating-wall bioreactor (RWB) [66], and Actinorhodin (ACT) in S. coelicolor in 2D-clinostat (SM-1) during Shenzhou-8 Space mission [67]. Interestingly, the production of Gramicidin S by Bacillus brevis remained unaffected in High-aspect rotating vessels (HARV) experiments [68]. Additionally, heightened bacterial resistance was observed in S. aureus against oxacillin, chloramphenicol, and erythromycin, attributed to cell wall thickening, while E. coli displayed increased resistance to colistin and kanamycin [69, 70].

The ultimate commercial goal of such studies is to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for the altered characteristics that are stimulated in microbes under extreme space conditions. As in the case of Fumigaclavine A, whereupon genomic analysis, the underlying mechanism for the increase in production was found to be a frameshift mutation in the dimethylallyl tryptophan synthase (FgaPT1) gene [71]. This knowledge can further be utilized or translated into research for improving the production efficiency of secondary metabolites in the terrestrial facilities (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Space microbiological studies are carried out at various levels; on ISS and space expeditions using spaceflight analogues or by simulating space environmental conditions on Earth (Images used under creative commons attribution license)

Astro Microbiology

Interplanetary Transit, Lithopanspermia, and Terraforming

All present life forms on Earth have originated from an ancestral cell as these forms have either DNA or RNA as their genetic material. But, the origin of that ancestral cell or one of its forerunners has remained a debatable topic of research, as it is sometimes questioned whether that ancestral cell originated on Earth or had arrived from a planet or a large moon from an extrasolar system via space travel [31, 72]. A study by Lingam and Loeb [73] addressed the possibility of interplanetary panspermia in the planetary system of seven planets orbiting the ultracool dwarf star, the TRAPPIST-1. The study concluded that life on one of these planets can spread to others through the transfer of rocky material. However, there is no consensus on what are the implications of lithopanspermia and extra-terrestrial life.

Astro microbiology, also known as exo-microbiology, studies microorganisms in outer space through an interdisciplinary approach encompassing astronomy, cosmology, planetary sciences, and biology. A key focus of Astro microbiology is to examine the possibility of microorganisms residing in meteorites and being transferred between orbits, a concept known as lithopanspermia. This idea stems from the Panspermia hypothesis, initially proposed by the Greek philosopher Anaxagoras (500–428 BCE), asserting that life could originate anywhere in the universe. The term "panspermia" refers to the interplanetary transport of "seeds of life." Microbes, potentially transported by comets or meteorites, are considered the most likely terrestrial species to endure the extreme conditions of space, including radiation and vacuum [74, 75]. Despite criticisms about the vulnerability of "unshielded" microorganisms to solar UV and galactic radiations in space, theories like lithopanspermia persisted until the late twentieth century. This persistence was challenged when meteorites from Mars were discovered on Earth and analyzed. In 1996, NASA's Lyndon B. Johnson Space Centre in Houston reported traces of fossil bacterial activity in the Martian meteorite ALH84001. The report suggested potential relic biogenic activity in the meteorite, referring to the formation of carbonate globules through biogenic processes involving liquid water [76]. Within the carbonate globules of ALH 84001, McKay and colleagues identified microscopic shapes resembling living and fossil bacteria on Earth, mineral grains similar to those produced by living and fossil bacteria, and organic chemical compounds resembling the decay products of bacteria on Earth [77].

The debate about whether these carbonates serve as biosignatures of Martian magneto-tactic bacteria fuelled further research into the theory of interplanetary life transport via natural processes such as asteroids or cometary impacts. In this respect, some experiments simulating the harsh space conditions, including low porosity and low ambient temperature characteristics of meteorite or host rocks, yielded promising results. Notably, model microorganisms used in these simulations included vegetative cells of soil bacteria: D. radiodurans and Rhodococcus erythropolis, halophilic archaea (Halorubrum and Halobacterium spp.), cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis and the lichens Xanthoria elegans and Rhizocarpon geographicum. Survival assessments of Bacillus subtilis WN511 spores during hypervelocity atmospheric transit and the resilience of spores from B. subtilis, Xanthoria elegans (lichens), and the cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis sp. 029 in simulated space conditions have been documented [78, 79]. In a notable study to examine the impact of intense acceleration shock and UV radiation on interplanetary transfer of microbes, Benardini et al. [80] subjected purified bacterial spores of B. pumilus and B. subtilis to 254-nm UV radiation and ballistics tests. Results revealed that environmental B. pumilus isolates were significantly more resistant to the subjected conditions than reference laboratory strains of B. subtilis, suggesting that the spores of environmental B. pumilus isolates might have a higher likelihood of surviving the challenges of interplanetary transfer. Another group further tested the UV resistance of purified spores from 10 NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL-SAF) B. pumilus isolates, comparing them with standard B. subtilis biodosimetry strains. Results showed that six out of the 10 JPL-SAF isolates displayed significantly higher UV resistance than the B. subtilis biodosimetry strain. Notably, B. pumilus SAFR-032 exhibited the highest level of spore UV resistance observed in any Bacillus species encountered up to that point [81]. In yet another study in 2009, B. subtilis spores were tested against compressional shock, heating, and acceleration ‘simultaneously’ by impacting a granite target with an aluminium projectile. The granite target was hit by an aluminium projectile at 5.4 km/s, resulting in a peak shock pressure of 57.1 GPa at the impact site. Although recovered spall fragments experienced pressures of 5–7 GPa, spore survival was calculated to be approximately 10−5 [82]. These findings were consistent with previous experiments, suggesting that endolithic spores or "ancient micronauts," can survive hypervelocity impacts, providing additional support for the theory of lithopanspermia [80]. On the contrary, in 2015, the SPORES experiment, part of the European Space Agency's EXPOSE-R mission, exposed Bacillus subtilis 168 spores to outer space conditions on the ISS for nearly two years. The aim was to investigate whether meteorite material could protect spores, simulating the hypothetical scenario of Lithopanspermia. Results showed that extraterrestrial UV radiation, especially at wavelengths > 110 nm, had a high inactivating potential, mainly due to DNA photodamage. This data highlights the limitations of Lithopanspermia for spores in the upper layers of impact-ejected rocks exposed to harmful solar UV radiation [83]. Therefore, additional experimental validations are crucial to support the theory of interplanetary microbe movement in space.

Efforts are also underway to select microorganisms for future space exploration, considering them as pioneering colonies for terraforming and termed "Proactive Inoculation Protocols" (PIPs) by Lopez et al. [6]. Aspergillus niger, a filamentous fungus, is suggested as a potential 'cell factory for life in space,' contributing to self-sustainability by producing food, enzymes, and antibiotics during space travel [84]. Despite its benefits, challenges arise from UV and ionizing radiation, causing issues such as reduced motility, photosynthesis inhibition, and, most critically, harm to nucleic acids. In addition to filamentous fungi, bacteria known for radiation resistance, such as D. radiodurans and Rubrobacter species, along with the green alga Dunaliella bardawil, are considered potential pioneering colonists on Martian or extraterrestrial landscapes [85]. To this end, Bacillus pumilus, a model organism for Europa's habitability, can withstand extreme temperatures, low nutrients, dry conditions, and UV-C radiation [86]. Chroococcidiopsidales members like Chroococcidiopsis are potential candidates for Mars and icy moons, being resilient to desiccation, radiation, microgravity, perchlorates, and low temperatures [87, 88]. Strains of Cladosporium sphaerospermum and Cremonium murorum, isolated from the Chernobyl Nuclear Plant, possess the ability to harness energy from ionizing radiation, positioning them as potential models for life in space exposed to continuous cosmic radiation [89, 90]. Apart from various other constraints that must be addressed, any long-term colonization projects will require meticulous strategic preparation in compliance with safety standards.

In 2021, the National Academies of Science's Committee on Planetary Protection (CoPP) released a report on microbial cleanliness for Mars missions. They focused on potential contamination risks, especially in areas like caves, where Earth microorganisms could end up in potentially habitable underground spaces. The report underscores the limited knowledge about Mars' surface and subsurface conditions, essential for understanding microbial behavior. This information is crucial for planetary protection and has implications for discussions on space exploration and microbial impacts in the context of terraforming [91].

Recent Advances: Microbes as Tiny Bioengineers of Space Stations

Deep space missions also necessitate the development and use of bioregenerative life support systems, relying on efficient nutrient recycling and increased production of high-nutrition food products [92]. The bioregenerative life support system (BLiSS) is being developed by harnessing microorganisms as "tiny bioengineers" to recycle organic waste in interconnected, controllable bioreactors [93]. These setups consist of three primary compartments: biological 'producers' such as plants, microalgae, and photosynthetic bacteria; 'consumers,' representing the crew; and 'degraders and recyclers' for waste, including fermentative and nitrifying bacteria [94]. Microbes are crucial in the recycling of wastewater and nutrients within these systems that incorporate a mix of anaerobic digestion, distillation, and disinfection units.

Compact microorganism-based recycling systems, like the ongoing MELiSSA project (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative), offer adaptability and operational simplicity compared to larger plant and animal compartments. Initiated in 1989, MELiSSA, inspired by a terrestrial ecosystem, is a European consortium comprising 30 organizations, working on reinventing Earth's regeneration system to support extended space missions [92]. Compartment I, using thermophilic bacteria like Clostridium thermocellum and C. thermosaccharolyticum, breaks down inedible plant parts and waste, producing volatile fatty acids, minerals, and NH4 + . In Compartment II, photoheterotrophic bacteria like Rhodospirillum rubrum metabolize volatile fatty acids. Compartment III houses nitrifying bacteria, like Nitrobacter or Nitrosomonas, converting NH4 + to NO3 − . In this way, the system yields a nitrogen-rich output, serving as fertilizer in the plant compartment to enhance production [95] (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

MELiSSA incorporates various chemical processes, mechanical filters, and bio-reactors that are full of bacteria or microalgae to build systems that are expected to provide a full meal, fresh drinking water, and clean air in space in the near future for permanent habitation in such life support systems. (Figure adapted from Verbeelen et al. [100] License CC BY 4.0)

The ISS also utilizes Water Recovery and Management (WRM) systems, where crew-produced urine or wastewater undergo treatment for reutilization [96]. Limnospira indica, commonly utilized for this organic waste recycling, can produce oxygen through photosynthesis with CO2 as its sole carbon source. In line with this, the European Space Agency is currently preparing a set of experiments to send Arthrospira bacteria to the ISS. The goal is to test and enhance the closure level in the MELiSSA ecosystem. These bacterial systems have the potential to be expanded for supplying O2 to a subject while consuming exhaled CO2 (source: https://www.esa.int/).

Additionally, microbes are being utilized as a tool to prepare Martian and lunar basalt, promoting optimal plant growth and nutrient absorption. Methylobacterium ajmalii sp. nov., isolated from the ISS, holds promise for promoting plant growth with auxin-producing genes, offering possibilities for self-sustaining plant crops in future space missions [97, 98]. The space environment, while supporting growth, induces stress and limits yield, making plants susceptible to infections. To address this, in the year 2021, a consortium of 21 space-viable, plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) has been proposed. Identified from ISS's VEGGIE crop production system, these bacteria show potential in facilitating nutrient uptake, inhibiting fungal growth, and supporting plant growth on spaceflight platforms, the Moon, and Mars. Some of these include Acinetobacter genomospecies 3, Burkholderia pyrocinnia, Cupriavidus pauculus, Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens, Paenibacillus macerans, Paenibacillus pabuli, Pantoea agglomerans, Pseudomonas fulva, and Ralstonia picketii [99].

Space microbiological studies are thus the next frontier in space exploration in which microbes are being used as teeniest astronauts.

Conclusion and Future Prospects

Understanding microbial resilience, their behavioral adaptations, and exploration of biofilms opens promising avenues for further investigation, potentially unveiling novel insights into extra-terrestrial ecosystems. The commercial landscape is also poised for transformation as altered microbial responses in space present opportunities for vaccine development and the production of desired compounds, propelling advancements in pharmaceutical and biotechnological industries. Moreover, Astro microbiology stands at the forefront of challenging traditional notions of life's origin, paving the way for ground-breaking research into the potential role of microbes as pioneers in terraforming other celestial bodies. As we look ahead, microbes are set to play a pivotal role in the development of bioregenerative life support systems, providing sustainable solutions crucial for the success of long-duration space missions. Their involvement extends to the preparation of extra-terrestrial environments, contributing to optimal plant growth and nutrient absorption, thereby shaping the future landscape of space exploration and habitation.

Acknowledgements

JK, JK and AN extend their sincere gratitude to Gargi, Maitreyi and Shivaji colleges for providing the academic environment and resources essential for the completion of this review work.

Author Contributions

JKb conceived the idea for the article, JK and JK performed the literature search, data analysis, and drafted the work, AN performed critical review of the draft.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Jasvinder Kaur and Jaspreet Kaur have equally contributed to this work.

Contributor Information

Jasvinder Kaur, Email: jasvinder.kaur@gargi.du.ac.in.

Jaspreet Kaur, Email: jkaur@maitreyi.du.ac.in.

References

  • 1.Lammer H, Güdel M, Kulikov Y, Ribas I, et al. Variability of solar/stellar activity and magnetic field and its influence on planetary atmosphere evolution. Earth Planet Sp. 2012;64:179–199. doi: 10.5047/eps.2011.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cottin H, Kotler JM, Billi D, Cockell C, et al. Space as a tool for astrobiology: review and recommendations for experimentations in earth orbit and beyond. Space Sci Rev. 2017;209:83–181. doi: 10.1007/s11214-017-0365-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Horneck G, Bücker H, Reitz G. Long-term survival of bacterial spores in space. Adv Space Res. 1994;14:41–45. doi: 10.1016/0273-1177(94)90448-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Milojevic T, Weckwerth W. Molecular mechanisms of microbial survivability in outer space: a systems biology approach. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:923. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lopez JV, Peixoto RS, Rosado AS. Inevitable future: space colonization beyond Earth with microbes first. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2019;95:fiz127. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiz127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Antunes A, Meyer-Dombard DR. Editorial: rising stars in space microbiology: 2022. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1322924. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1322924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lal R. Microbiology in space. Indian J Microbiol. 2010;50:1. doi: 10.1007/s12088-010-0047-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kanapskyte A, Hawkins EM, Liddell LC, Bhardwaj SR, Gentry D, Santa Maria SR. Space biology research and biosensor technologies: past, present, and future. Biosensors. 2021;11:38. doi: 10.3390/bios11020038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Padma TV. India’s moon mission: four things Chandrayaan-3 has taught scientists. Nature. 2023;621:456–456. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-02852-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Horneck G, Klaus DM, Mancinelli RL. Space microbiology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74:121–156. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00016-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Raeva NV, Klemparskaya NN. On the mechanism of increased radio-resistance in lactoprophylaxis of acute radiation sickness. Bull Exp Biol Med. 1964;58:800–803. doi: 10.1007/BF00862686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Baker PW, Leff L. The effect of simulated microgravity on bacteria from the mir space station. Microgravity Sci Technol. 2004;15:35–41. doi: 10.1007/BF02870950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Saffary R, Nandakumar R, Spencer D, Robb FT, et al. Microbial survival of space vacuum and extreme ultraviolet irradiation: strain isolation and analysis during a rocket flight. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002;215:163–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11386.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aunins TR, Erickson KE, Prasad N, Levy SE, Jones A, Shrestha S, Mastracchio R, Stodieck L, Klaus D, Zea L, Chatterjee A. Spaceflight modifies Escherichia coli gene expression in response to antibiotic exposure and reveals role of oxidative stress response. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:310. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nickerson CA, Ott CM, Mister SJ, Morrow BJ, Burns-Keliher L, Pierson DL. Microgravity as a novel environmental signal affecting Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium virulence. Infect Immun. 2000;68:3147–3152. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.6.3147-3152.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wilson JW, Ott CM, Ramamurthy R, Porwollik S, McClelland M, Pierson DL, Nickerson CA. Low-shear modelled microgravity alters the Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium stress response in an RpoS-independent manner. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:5408–5416. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.11.5408-5416.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wilson JW, Ramamurthy R, Porwollik S, McClelland M, Hammond T, Allen P, Ott CM, Pierson DL, Nickerson CA. Microarray analysis identifies Salmonella genes belonging to the low-shear modeled microgravity regulon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:13807–13812. doi: 10.1073/pnas.212387899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wilson JW, Ott CM, Honer zu Bentrup K, Ramamurthy R, Quick L, Porwollik S, et al. Space flight alters bacterial gene expression and virulence and reveals a role for global regulator Hfq. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:16299–16304. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707155104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lynch SV, Mukundakrishnan K, Benoit MR, Ayyaswamy PS, Matin A. Escherichia coli biofilms formed under low-shear modeled microgravity in a ground-based system. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:7701–7710. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01294-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Crabbe A, Boever PD, Houdt RV, Moors H, Mergeay M, Cornelis P. Use of the rotating wall vessel technology to study the effect of shear stress on growth behavior of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:2098–2110. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01631.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Crabbe A, Boever PD, Houdt RV, Monsieurs P, Nickerson C, Leys N, Cornelis P. Response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 to low shear modelled microgravity involves AlgU regulation. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12:1545–1564. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02184.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Alan HBW. Tietz clinical guide to laboratory tests. 4. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gupta R, Shah P, Swiatlo E. Differential gene expression in Streptococcus pneumoniae in response to various iron sources. Microb Pathog. 2009;47:101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2009.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Castro SL, Nelman-Gonzalez M, Nickerson CA, Ott CM. Induction of attachment-independent biofilm formation and repression of Hfq expression by low-fluid-shear culture of Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:6368–6378. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00175-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lawal A, Jejelowo OA, Rosenzweig JA. The effects of low-shear mechanical stress on Yersinia pestis virulence. Astrobiology. 2010;10:881–888. doi: 10.1089/ast.2010.0493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dornmayr-Pfaffenhuemer M, Legat A, Schwimbersky K, Fendrihan S, Stan-Lotter H. Responses of haloarchaea to simulated microgravity. Astrobiology. 2011;11:199–205. doi: 10.1089/ast.2010.0536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Purevdorj-Gage B, Sheehan KB, Hyman LE. Effects of low-shear modelled microgravity on cell function, gene expression, and phenotype in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:4569–4575. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03050-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Altenburg SD, Nielsen-Preiss SM, Hyman LE. Increased filamentous growth of Candida albicans in simulated microgravity. Genom Proteom Bioinf. 2008;6:42–50. doi: 10.1016/S1672-0229(08)60019-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Searles SC, Woolley CM, Petersen RA, Hyman LE, Nielsen-Preiss SM. Modelled microgravity increases filamentation, biofilm formation, phenotypic switching, and antimicrobial resistance in Candida albicans. Astrobiology. 2011;11:825–836. doi: 10.1089/ast.2011.0664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kawaguchi Y, Shibuya M, Kinoshita I, Yatabe J, et al. DNA damage and survival time course of Deinococcal cell pellets during 3 years of exposure to outer space. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:2050. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.02050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nicholson WL. Ancient micronauts: Interplanetary transport of microbes by cosmic impacts. Trends Microbiol. 2009;17:243–250. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wassmann M, Moeller R, Rabbow E, Panitz C, et al. Survival of spores of the UV-Resistant Bacillus subtilis Strain MW01 after exposure to low-earth orbit and simulated Martian conditions: data from the space experiment ADAPT on EXPOSE-E. Astrobiology. 2012;12:498–507. doi: 10.1089/ast.2011.0772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Billi D, Viaggiu E, Cockell CS, Rabbow E, et al. Damage escape and repair in dried Chroococcidiopsis spp. from hot and cold deserts exposed to simulated space and martian conditions. Astrobiology. 2011;11:65–73. doi: 10.1089/ast.2009.0430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Baqué M, de Vera JP, Rettberg P, Billi D. The BOSS and BIOMEX space experiments on the EXPOSE-R2 mission: endurance of the desert cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis under simulated space vacuum, Martian atmosphere, UVC radiation and temperature extremes. Acta Astronaut. 2013;91:180–186. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.05.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Santomartino R, Waajen AC, de Wit W, Nicholson N, et al. No effect of microgravity and simulated mars gravity on final bacterial cell concentrations on the international space station: applications to space bioproduction. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:579156. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.579156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Leuko S, Rettberg P, Pontifex A, Burns B. On the response of halophilic Archaea to space conditions. Life. 2014;4:66–76. doi: 10.3390/life4010066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mancinelli RL, Klovstad M. Martian soil and UV radiation: microbial viability assessment on spacecraft surfaces. Planet Space Sci. 2000;48:1093–1097. doi: 10.1016/S0032-0633(00)00083-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cockell CS, Raven JA. Zones of photosynthetic potential on Mars and the early Earth. Icarus. 2004;169:300–310. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2003.12.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hassler DM, Zeitlin C, Wimmer-Schweingruber RF, Ehresmann B, et al. Mars’ surface radiation environment measured with the mars science laboratory’s curiosity rover. Science. 2014;343:1244797. doi: 10.1126/science.1244797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cottin H, Rettberg P. EXPOSE-R2 on the international space station (2014–2016): results from the PSS and BOSS astrobiology experiments. Astrobiology. 2019;19:975–978. doi: 10.1089/ast.2019.0625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tesei D, Chiang AJ, Kalkum M, Stajich JE, et al. Effects of simulated microgravity on the proteome and secretome of the polyextremotolerant black fungus Knufia chersonesos. Front Genet. 2021;12:638708. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.638708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Blachowicz A, Chiang AJ, et al. Proteomic characterization of Aspergillus fumigatus isolated from air and surfaces of the international space station. Fungal Genet Biol. 2019;124:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2019.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ott E, Kawaguchi Y, Kölbl D, et al. Molecular repertoire of Deinococcus radiodurans after 1 year of exposure outside the international space station within the Tanpopo mission. Microbiome. 2020;8:150. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00927-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Singh NK, Bezdan D, Checinska SA, Wheeler K, et al. Multi-drug resistant Enterobacter bugandensis species isolated from the International space station and comparative genomic analyses with human pathogenic strains. BMC Microbiol. 2018;18:175. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1325-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pickerson CA, Ott CM, Wilson JW, Ramamurthy R, Pierson DL. Microbial responses to microgravity and other low-shear environments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68:345–361. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.68.2.345-361.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wilson JW, Ott CM, et al. Space flight alters bacterial gene expression and virulence and reveals a role for global regulator Hfq. PNAS. 2007;104:16299–16304. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707155104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zea L (2015) Drug Discovery and Development in Space, IAC-15-A1.8x27627, 66th International Astronautical Congress, Jerusalem, Israel, October 12–16
  • 48.Benoit MR, Li W, Stodieck LS, Lam KS, et al. Microbial antibiotic production aboard the International Space Station. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;70:403–411. doi: 10.1007/s00253-005-0098-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liu C. The theory and application of space microbiology: China’s experiences in space experiments and beyond: the theory and application of space microbiology. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:426–433. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bijlani S, Stephens E, Singh NK, Venkateswaran K, Wang CC. Advances in space microbiology. Iscience. 2021;24:102395. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Corydon TJ, Schulz H, Richter P, Strauch SM, Böhmer M, Ricciardi DA, Wehland M, Krüger M, Erzinger GS, Lebert M, et al. Current knowledge about the Impact of microgravity on gene regulation. Cells. 2023;12:1043. doi: 10.3390/cells12071043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sharma G, Curtis PD. The impacts of microgravity on bacterial metabolism. Life. 2022;12:774. doi: 10.3390/life12060774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Huang B, Li DG, Huang Y, et al. Effects of spaceflight and simulated microgravity on microbial growth and secondary metabolism. Mil Med Res. 2018;5:18. doi: 10.1186/s40779-018-0162-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ulrich N, Nagler K, Laue M, Cockell CS, Setlow P, Moeller R. Experimental studies addressing the longevity of Bacillus subtilis spores—the first data from a 500-year experiment. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0208425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Facius R, Bücker H, Horneck G, Reitz G, Schäfer M, et al. Dosimetric and biological results from the Bacillus subtilis biostack experiment with the Aapollo-Soyuz test project. Life Sci Space Res. 1979 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-023416-8.50020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ciferri O, Tiboni O, Di G, Orlandoni AM, Marchesi ML. Effects of microgravity on genetic recombination in Escherichia coli. Naturwissenschaften. 1986;73:418–421. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0666-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zea L, Larsen M, Estante F, Qvortrup K, Moeller R, Dias de Oliveira S, Stodieck L, Klaus D. Phenotypic changes exhibited by E. coli cultured in Space. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1598. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wilson JW, Ott CM, Quick L, Davis R, et al. Media ion composition controls regulatory and virulence response of Salmonella in spaceflight. PLoS ONE. 2008;23:e3923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Checinska SA, Urbaniak C, Mohan GBM, Stepanov VG, et al. Characterization of the total and viable bacterial and fungal communities associated with the international space station surfaces. Microbiome. 2019;7:50. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0666-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lam KS, Gustavson DR, Pirnik DL, Pack E, et al. The effect of space flight on the production of Actinomycin D by Streptomyces plicatus. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;29:299–302. doi: 10.1038/sj.jim.7000312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Liu M, Gao H, Shang P, Zhou X, Ashforth E, Zhuo Y, et al. Magnetic field is the dominant factor to induce the response of Streptomyces avermitilis in altered gravity simulated by diamagnetic levitation. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Xiao Y, Liu Y, Wang G, Hao Z, An Y. Simulated microgravity alters growth and microcystin production in Microcystis aeruginosa (cyanophyta) Toxicon. 2010;56:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lam KS, Mamber SW, Pack EJ, Forenza S, et al. The effects of space flight on the production of Monorden by Humicola fuscoatra WC5157 in solid-state fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1998;4:579–583. doi: 10.1007/s002530051216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Fang X, Zhao Z, Gu H. A study on space mutation of Streptomyces fradiae. Space Med Med Eng (Beijing) 2005;18:121–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yang W, Han L, Mandlaa M, Zhang H, et al. A plate method for rapid screening of Ketogulonicigenium vulgare mutants for enhanced 2-keto-l-gulonic acid production. Braz J Microbiol. 2017;48:397–402. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fang A, Pierson D, Mishra S, et al. Growth of Streptomyces hygroscopicus in rotating-wall bioreactor under simulated microgravity inhibits Rapamycin production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000;54:33–36. doi: 10.1007/s002539900303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Huang B, Liu N, Rong X, Ruan J, Huang Y. Effects of simulated microgravity and spaceflight on morphological differentiation and secondary metabolism of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:4409–4422. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6386-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Fang A, Pierson D, Mishra S, et al. Production by Bacillus brevis in simulated microgravity. Curr Microbiol. 1997;34:199–204. doi: 10.1007/s002849900168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tixador R, Richoilley G, Gasset G, Templier J, et al. Study of minimal inhibitory concentration of antibiotics on bacteria cultivated in vitro in space (Cytos 2 experiment) Aviat Space Environ Med. 1985;56:748–751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lapchine L, Moatti N, Gasset G, Richoilley G, Templier J, Tixador R. Antibiotic activity in space. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1986;12:933–938. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Knox BP, Blachowicz A, Palmer JM, Romsdahl J, Huttenlocher A, Wang CC, et al. Characterization of Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from air and surfaces of the International Space Station. mSphere. 2016;1:e00227–16. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00227-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Valtonen M, Nurmi P, Zheng JQ, Cucinotta FA, et al. Natural transfer of viable microbes in space from planets in extra-solar systems to a planet in our solar system and vice versa. Astrophy J. 2009;690:210–215. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/210. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lingam M, Loeb A. Enhanced interplanetary panspermia in the TRAPPIST-1 system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:6689–6693. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703517114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cockell CS. The interplanetary exchange of photosynthesis. Orig Life Evol Biosph. 2008;38:87–104. doi: 10.1007/s11084-007-9112-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zagorski ZP. Question 2: relation of panspermia-hypothesis to astrobiology. Orig Life Evol Biosph. 2007;37:351–355. doi: 10.1007/s11084-007-9074-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Mileikowsky C. Natural transfer of viable microbes in pace 1. From mars to earth and earth to mars. Icarus. 2000;145:391–427. doi: 10.1006/icar.1999.6317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Thomas-Keprta KL, Clemett SJ, Bazylinski DA, Kirschvink JL, McKay DS, Wentworth SJ, et al. Magnetofossils from ancient Mars: a robust biosignature in the Martian meteorite ALH84001. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:3663–3672. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.8.3663-3672.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Meyer C, Fritz J, Misgaiski M, Stöffler D, et al. Shock experiments in support of the lithopanspermia theory: The influence of host rock composition, temperature, and shock pressure on the survival rate of endolithic and epilithic microorganisms: shock experiments in support of lithopanspermia. Meteorit Planet Sci. 2011;46:701–718. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2011.01184.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Stöffler D, Horneck G, Ott S, Hornemann U, et al. Experimental evidence for the potential impact ejection of viable microorganisms from mars and mars-like planets. Icarus. 2007;186:585–588. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2006.11.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Benardini JN, Sawyer J, Venkateswaran K, Nicholson WL. Spore UV and acceleration resistance of endolithic Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus subtilis isolates obtained from Sonoran desert Basalt: implications for lithopanspermia. Astrobiology. 2003;3:709–717. doi: 10.1089/153110703322736033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Link L, Sawyer J, Venkateswaran K, et al. Extreme spore UV resistance of Bacillus pumilus isolates obtained from an ultraclean spacecraft assembly facility. Microb Ecol. 2003;47:159–163. doi: 10.1007/s00248-003-1029-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Fajardo-Cavazos P, Langenhorst F, Melosh HJ, Nicholson WL. Bacterial spores in granite survive hypervelocity launch by spallation: implications for lithopanspermia. Astrobiology. 2009;9:647–657. doi: 10.1089/ast.2008.0326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Panitz C, Horneck G, Rabbow E, Rettberg P, Moeller R, Cadet J, Douki T, Reitz G. The SPORES experiment of the EXPOSE-R mission: Bacillus subtilis spores in artificial meteorites. Int J Astrobiology. 2015;14:105–114. doi: 10.1017/S1473550414000251. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Cortesão M, Schütze T, Marx R, Moeller R, Meyer V. Fungal biotechnology in space: why and how? In: Nevalainen Helena., editor. Grand challenges in fungal biotechnology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 501–535. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Paulino-Lima IG, Janot-Pacheco E, Galante D, Cockell C, et al. Survival of Deinococcus radiodurans against laboratory-simulated solar wind charged particles. Astrobiology. 2011;11:875–882. doi: 10.1089/ast.2011.0649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Schultz J, Modolon F, Peixoto RS, Rosado AS. Shedding light on the composition of extreme microbial dark matter: alternative approaches for culturing extremophiles. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1167718. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1167718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Billi D, Gallego Fernandez B, Fagliarone C, Chiavarini S, Rothschild LJ. Exploiting a perchlorate-tolerant desert cyanobacterium to support bacterial growth for in situ resource utilization on mars. Int J Astrobiol. 2021;20:29–35. doi: 10.1017/S1473550420000300. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Napoli A, Micheletti D, Pindo M, Larger S, Cestaro A, de Vera JP, et al. Absence of increased genomic variants in the cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis exposed to mars-like conditions outside the space station. Sci Rep. 2022;12:8437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12631-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Cosciotti B, Balbi A, Ceccarelli A, Fagliarone C, Mattei E, Lauro SE, et al. Survivability of anhydrobiotic cyanobacteria in salty ice: implications for the habitability of icy worlds. Life. 2019;9:86. doi: 10.3390/life9040086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Blachowicz A, Chiang AJ, Elsaesser A, Kalkum M, Ehrenfreund P, Stajich JE, et al. Proteomic and metabolomic characteristics of extremophilic fungi under simulated mars conditions. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1013. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Olsson-Francis K, Doran PT, Ilyin V, Raulin F, Rettberg P, Kminek G, et al. The COSPAR planetary protection policy for robotic missions to mars: a review of current scientific knowledge and future perspectives. Life Sci Space Res (Amst) 2023;36:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.lssr.2022.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Garrett-Bakelman FE, Darshi M, Green SJ, Gur RC, et al. The NASA twins study: a multidimensional analysis of a year-long human spaceflight. Science. 2019;364:eaau8650. doi: 10.1126/science.aau8650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hendrickx L, De WH, Hermans V, Mastroleo F, et al. Microbial ecology of the closed artificial ecosystem MELiSSA (micro-ecological life support system alternative): reinventing and compartmentalizing the Earth’s food and oxygen regeneration system for long-haul space exploration missions. Res Microbiol. 2006;157:77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.De Micco V, Amitrano C, Mastroleo F, et al. Plant and microbial science and technology as cornerstones to bioregenerative life support systems in space. NPJ Microgravity. 2023;9:69. doi: 10.1038/s41526-023-00317-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Koehle AP, Brumwell SL, Seto EP, et al. Microbial applications for sustainable space exploration beyond low Earth orbit. NPJ Microgravity. 2023;9:47. doi: 10.1038/s41526-023-00285-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Volpin F, Badeti U, Wang C, Jiang J, et al. Urine treatment on the international space station: current practice and novel approaches. Membranes (Basel) 2020;10:327. doi: 10.3390/membranes10110327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Grossi CEM, Fantino E, Serral F, Zawoznik MS, et al. Methylobacterium sp. 2A is a plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria that has the potential to improve potato crop yield under adverse conditions. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:71. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Bijlani S, Singh NK, Eedara VVR, Podile AR, et al. Methylobacterium ajmalii sp. Nov., isolated from the International Space Station. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:639396. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.639396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Handy D, Hummerick ME, Dixit AR, Ruby AM, Massa G, Palmer A. Identification of plant growth promoting bacteria within space crop production systems. Front Astron Space Sci. 2021;8:735834. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2021.735834. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Verbeelen T, Leys N, Ganigué R, Mastroleo F. Development of nitrogen recycling strategies for bioregenerative life support systems in space. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:700810. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.700810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES