Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: Ocul Surf. 2023 Apr 13;29:77–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.04.005

Table 5.

Characteristics of included trials.

Study ID Country,
setting
Target
population
Age, years
mean ± SD
(range)
Female,
n/N (%)
Major race/
ethnicity, n/
N (%)
Intervention (formula) Comparison Treatment
duration
No.
randomized/
analyzed,
Intervention
group
No.
randomized/
analyzed,
Comparison
group
No. analyzed
for AE,
Intervention/
Comparison
Note
Parallel design
Borchert 2016 USA & Brazil, multi-site Mixeda 14.5 (5–17)/14.6 (8–17) 53/71 (75) White, 46/71 (65) Bimatoprost 0.03% (soln) Vehicle 4 months 48/48 23/23 48/23 Eyelash parameters measured by DIA; industry-funded; NCT01023841 (clinicaltrials.gov); additional 1-month follow-up period after DC treatment
Glaser 2015 US & UK, multi-site Clinical patients 49.3 ± 11.1 235/238 (98.7) White, 202/238 (84.9) Bimatoprost 0.03% (soln) Vehicle 6 monthse 179/179 59/59 118/59 Eyelash parameters measured by DIA; industry-funded; NCT00907426 (clinicaltrials.gov); reported data for participants with idiopathic hypotrichosis; 3-arm studyb
Wirta 2015 US & UK, multi-site Clinical patients 50.7 (26–76) 129/130 (99.2) Caucasian, 103/130 (79.2) Bimatoprost 0.03% (soln) Vehicle 6 monthse 96/96 34/34 96/33 Eyelash parameters measured by DIA; industry-funded; NCT00907426 (clinicaltrials.gov); reproted data for participants with postchemotherapy hypotrichosis
Harii 2014(study1) Japan, multi-site Clinical patients 40.1 (28–76)/41.4(20–64) 155/173 (89.6) Asian, 173/173 (100) Bimatoprost 0.03% (soln) Vehicle 4 months 88/88 85/85 NR/NR Eyelash parameters measured by DIA; industry-funded; reported results of two trials: study 1 with an initial target enrollment of 126 participants; “the safety population, which consisted of all the subjects who received at least one dose of study medication"
Harii 2014 (study2) Japan, multi-site Clinical patients 46.3 (31–61)/54.9 (39–74) 36/36 (100) Asian, 36/36 (100) Bimatoprost 0.03% (soln) Vehicle 4 months 18/18 18/18 NR/NR Eyelash parameters measured by DIA; industry-funded; reported results of two trials: study 2 was a safety trial, “not powered for efficacy”; “the safety population, which consisted of all the subjects who received at least one dose of study medication"
Smith 2012 US & Canada, multi-site Healthy volunteers 49.9 (22–77)/49.7 (22–78) 270/278 (97.1) White, 225/278 (80.9) Bimatoprost 0.03% (soln) Vehicle 16 weeks 137/137 141/141 137/141 Eyelash parameters measured by DIA; industry-funded; NCT00693420 (clinicaltrials.gov); additional visit at week 20 (4 weeks after DC treatment)
Woodward 2010 US, single site Healthy volunteers 49.2 (27–69) 51/52 (98) NR Bimatoprost 0.03% (gel) Vehicle 6 months 36/36 16/16 36/16 Eyelash parameters measured by DIA; funded by Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. and Duke University Eye Center; mean IOP at baseline and month 6 were compared between two groups
Fabbrocini 2019 Italy, single site Clinical patients 42.25 ± 16 (Range 25–69) 40/40 (100) NR 15-keto fluprostenol isopropyl ester (gel) Vehicle 60 days 20/30 20/20 20/20 Eyelash parameters measured by DIA; sources of funding NR
Paired-eye design
Wester 2010 US, single site Healthy volunteers 46 (23–69) 19/19 (100) NR Bimatoprost 0.03% (gel) Normal saline mixed 1:1 with Gonakd 6 weeks 19/15 (eyes) 19/15 (eyes) 15 Eyelash parameters measured by DIA; funded by Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. and NEI; NCT00773136 (clinicaltrials.gov); mean changes in IOP at week 6 were reported for both groups with no differences (P = 1.00)
Morris 2011 US, single site Clinical patients Median 50 (Range 31–66) 20/20 (100) Caucasian, 16/18 (89) Bimatoprost 0.03% (gel) No treatment 3 months 20/13 (eyes) 20/13 (eyes) 13 Eyelash parameters measured by DIA; funded by Duke University; NCT01200251 (clinicaltrials.gov); “two patients withdrew from the study unrelated to the eyelash gel” and were excluded from the analysis
Qualitative synthesis only
Cohen 2013 US, multi-site Clinical patients NR NR NR Bimatoprost 0.03% (soln) Placebo 16 weeks 44/NR 44/NR NR/NR Industry-funded; a conference proceeding
Roseborough 2009 US, single Clinical patients NR NR NR Latanoprost (soln) Bimatoprost 16 weeks NR/NR NR/NR NR/NR Eyelash parameters measured by DIA; funding source none reported; a Research Letter; overall, “11 patients completed the study"
Choy 2008 US, single Healthy volunteers (Range 20–56) 33/34 (97) NR Dechloro ethylcloprostenolamide Placebo 4 weeks 23/NR (eyes) 11/NR (eyes) 34 La Canada Ventures, Inc; all authors reported conflicts of interests with the testing product
Faghihi 2009 Iran, single site Clinical patients 22.5 ± 7.6 (Range 11–40) 12/26 (46) NR Latanoprost (soln) No treatment 4 months 26/26 (eyes) 26/26 (eyes) 26 None reported; a Brief report

Abbreviations: AE, adverse events; DIA, digital image analyzer; DC, discontinue; No., number; NR, not reported; SD, standard deviation; soln, ophthalmic solution.

a

Mixture of clinical patients and healthy volunteers.

b

Randomization ratio of 2:1 to bimatoprost 0.03% vs vehicle, with one intervention arm receiving bimatoprost for 12 months and the other for 6 months followed by a cross-over to vehicle in the second 6-month period.

c

MD Lash Factor contains no prostaglandin analogue, and was provided in full strength, half-strength, or quarter strength in (intervention) groups A, B, D; group C was placebo.

d

Gonake (Akorn Inc., Lake Forest, IL).

e

Outcome and safety data were extracted from the end of the first 4 or 6 month after randomization.