Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 1;15:1394096. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1394096

Table 6.

Comparison of Gender, Task Performance, and Self–reported Rating Scales between Low and High Reaction time and Reaction Time Variability.

Mu Sigma Tau
Variables Low High t Low High t Low High t
Gender 0.6 (0.5) 0.6 (0.5) 0.68 0.6 (4.8) 0.6 (0.5) 0.14 0.5 (0.5) 0.7 (0.5) –1.8
T
a
s
k
s
Digit span 11.7 (3.1) 10.1 (3.1) 2.15* 11.5 (3.6) 10.3 (2.6) 1.59 11.6 (3.1) 10.2 (3.1) 1.9
Stroop Color 74.0 (13.9) 66.7 (10.5) 2.39* 72.7 (14.3) 68.0 (10.8) 1.52 70.2 (14.1) 70.6 (11.5) –0.12
Stroop Color–Word 52.1 (9.1) 47.4 (8.3) 2.20* 52.0 (8.8) 47.4 (8.6) 2.17* 52.1 (9.8) 47.3 (7.3) 2.29*
S
c
a
l
e
s
BAARS 51.2 (10.7) 52.1 (7.9) –0.39 50.7 (8.5) 52.6 (10.2) –0.86 50.6 (10.1) 52.8 (8.6) –1.0
BDEFS 27.9 (8.0) 27.6 (6.0) 0.2 27.5 (6.9) 28.0 (7.2) –0.30 27.6 (7.4) 27.9 (6.7) –0.2
ARI 8.8 (2.6) 8.8 (2.4) –0.05 8.7 (2.3) 9.0 (2.6) –0.53 8.6 (2.0) 9.0 (2.9) –0.73

*p<0.05, Mean (STD) are shown.