Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2024 Apr 30;27(6):1187–1198. doi: 10.1038/s41593-024-01618-2

Fig. 7: Similarity of border and ectopic variants across subgroups of individuals.

Fig. 7:

For border variants (A) and ectopic variants (B), we separated individuals into subgroups based on the average network similarity vector of their variants (left). Matrices on the right show across-subject similarity (correlation) of variant profiles for each split-half in the HCP. Color blocks at the edges of the matrices denote the subgroup identities. The two variant forms produced three subgroups each with high similarity across matched split-halves of the HCP data. However, the subgroups differed between the two forms. Error bars in (A) and (B) represent standard error of correlation values across subjects within a given subgroup/split-half. (C) Contingency tables show the composition of subgroups in which each individual’s variant profile (all variants, border variants only, and ectopic variants only) was forced to sort into either a DMN-like subgroup or a control/processing subgroup. Note that ectopic and border variant subgroup labels had poor association with one another.