Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 12;36(2):128–136. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1386

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) Receiver operator characteristics curve (ROC) analysis of risk GRACE score predicted CAD at the 87.3% sensitivity and 60.8% specificity at >112 cut off with 0.78 area under the curve (AUC). (b) Receiver operator characteristics curve analysis of risk QRISK3 score predicted CAD at the 61.7% sensitivity and 71.4% specificity at >15.2 cut off with 0.71 area under the curve (AUC). (c) Receiver operator characteristics curve analysis of risk FRS CHD score predicted CAD at the 66.5% sensitivity and 69.2% specificity at >8 cut off with 0.70 area under the curve (AUC). (d) Receiver operator characteristics curve analysis of risk ASCVD score predicted CAD at the 62.8% sensitivity and 71.9% specificity at >9.4 cut off with 0.70 area under the curve (AUC). (e) Receiver operator characteristics curve analysis of risk SERENE-CAG score predicted CAD at the 64% sensitivity and 48.5% specificity at >2.82 cut off with 0.57 area under the curve (AUC).