Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 21;14(7):4779–4791. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1821

Table 1. Comparison of results achieved by the top-ranking registration methods.

Method TRE (mm)↓ Robustness↑ %|Jϕ(p)|0
Elastix 4.54±3.22
3D Inception-Based TransMorph 2.24±1.52 0.82±0.26 0.17±0.28
NICE-Net 1.98±1.46 0.83±0.16 0.16±0.21
Hypermorph 2.64±2.00 0.81±0.27 0.27±1.57
cLapIRN 2.03±1.31 0.80±0.25 0.23±0.18
DIRAC 1.91±1.06 0.82±0.24 0.14±0.20
DIRAC-D 1.88±1.01 0.82±0.23 0.09±0.16
Ours 1.82±0.94 0.85±0.18 0.19±0.24

Results are provided as mean ± standard deviation. ↑, higher is better; ↓, lower is better. TRE, target registration error.